期刊文献+

考虑监管惩罚的两类运作系统应急运作模型 被引量:1

Disruption management of two-types operation systems with supervision penalty
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对电力、石化等区域垄断性运作系统能力因突发事件受损的情况,从运作管理的视角探讨监管惩罚、管理者应急态度和应急决策之间的关系,并以此构造相应的单阶段和多阶段应急运作模型.从理论上证明了监管惩罚的边界和惩罚机制参数与应急决策变量的相关关系,在此基础上对服务和生产两类系统的监管机制和管理者应急决策进行数值模拟分析.仿真结果表明,所提出的方法对监管部门制定惩罚机制、管理者改善应急管理绩效具有较好的启示. Great loss would occur when some regional monopoly operation systems(OS), such as the power grid and refinery, loss their critical capacities after some shock of unexpected events. Therefore, a situation is considered that a third-party regulator, such as public sector, launches the supervision penalty to motivate the OS's manager to accelerate its recovery procedure. The relationship of supervision penalty, the manger's contingent attitude and decision variables in a single and a multiple-periods environment. Some numerical analysis of the two-types of OS are made. Simulation results show that the proposed method can help the regulator to setup up an effective supervision-penalty mechanism, and also can help the OS's manager to make a decision during the recovery procedure.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期677-684,共8页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71302033 71002084) 教育部博士点基金项目(2011332612002) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ12G01004) 浙江省社科规划"之江青年课题研究"成果项目(13ZJQN048YB)
关键词 监管惩罚 运作系统 应急运作 应急态度 supervision penalty operation systems disruption management contingency attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Aoki M, Rothwell G. A comparative institutional analysis of Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lessons and policy implications[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 53: 240-247.
  • 2Kleindorfer P R, Saad G H. Managing disruption risks insupply chains[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2005, 14(1): 53-68.
  • 3Zsidisin G, Melnyk S, Ragatz G. An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply chain management[J]. Int J of Production Research, 2005, 43(16): 3401-3420.
  • 4傅克俊,胡祥培,王旭坪.供应链系统中的应急策略与模型[J].中国软科学,2007(5):119-124. 被引量:21
  • 5Berge P D, Gerstenfeld A, Zeng A Z. How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach[J]. Omega, 2004, 32(1): 9-15.
  • 6Ruiz-Torresa A J, Mahmoodi E The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures[J]. Int J of Production Economics, 2007, 35(1): 104-115.
  • 7Meena P L, Sarmah S P, Sarkar A. Sourcing decisions under risk of catastrophic event disruptions[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2011, 47(6): 1058-1074.
  • 8Tomlin B T. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(5): 639-657.
  • 9Sawik T. Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 259-269.
  • 10Qi L. A continuous-review inventory model with random disruptions at the primary supplier[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2013, 225(1): 59-74.

二级参考文献46

共引文献51

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部