期刊文献+

美国“电子传闻证据例外”的提出及其预期影响 被引量:5

“Exception to Electronic Hearsay Evidence” Proposal in the United States and its Expected Impact
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着网络技术的发展,数字化交流模式越来越普遍,而诉讼领域也出现越来越多的电子证据。在美国,既有的传闻证据规则将大量有效的电子证据排除出外,导致案件裁断者失去了许多全面了解案情真实的机会。"电子传闻证据例外"(e Hearsay Exception)的提出旨在解决这一问题,将有价值的可靠的电子传闻证据从带有偏见或内容模糊的电子证据中过滤出来,赋予其可采性。"电子传闻证据例外"以"最近获知例外"(Statement of Recent Perception Exception)为基础,将适用的对象限定为描述最近事项的、非基于诉讼目的的、非匿名的陈述。这一例外的创设能够有效促进三类传闻陈述(出庭证人的传闻陈述、不能出庭的被害人的传闻陈述、不能出庭的证人的传闻陈述)进入案件裁断者的考量视野。 With the development of Internet technology,digital communication is growing increasingly common, so does electronic evidence in lawsuits. In the United States, the existing hearsay rule excludes large amount of effective electronic evidence, resulting in the failure to comprehensively understand the truth behind a case. 'Exception to Electronic Hearsay Evidence' proposal aims to solve this problem, extracting valuable and reliable electronic hearsay evidence from biased or vague content and giving it admissibility. 'Exception to Electronic HearsayEvidence'is based on Statement of Recent Perception Exception and applies to statements which are descriptive of recent events, not based on the purpose of litigation, and non-anonymous. This effectively takes three kinds of hearsay into consideration(hearsay statements of witnesses in court, hearsay statements from victims who are unable to appear in court, hearsay statements from witnesses who are unable to appear in court).
作者 刘玫 徐天然
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 CSSCI 2015年第2期42-50,158-159,共9页 Journal Of CUPL
基金 刘玫教授主持的教育部项目--"传闻证据规则的理论与实践"(项目编号:10912290)的阶段性成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1United States v. Harry, No. CR10-1915-JB, 2013 WL30(D.N.M. Feb. 19, 2013).
  • 2Meeting Minutes, Federal Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules 13 (Oct. 5, 2012), available at http:// wwvc.uscourts.gov/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/rules/Agenda% 2013ooks/Evidence/EV2012-10.pdI,last visited on Nov. 13th, 2014.
  • 3See Virginia Heffernan, The Medium: Being There, N.Y. Times Mag., Feb. 10, 2009, at p,15.
  • 4See Christopher B. Mueller, Post-Modem Hearsay Reform: The Importance of Complexity, 76 Minn. L.Rev. 367, 373-384 (1992).
  • 5Paul Ohm, The Fourth Amendment in a World Without Privacy, 81 Miss. L.J. 1309, 1314-15 (2012).
  • 62014 Smartphone ownership demographics, available at http://www.edisonresearch.com/2014- smartphone-ownership-demographics/,last visited on Dec. 10th,2014.
  • 7Communication by Generation: How Often Do You Text, Email, Chat, Facebook? Available at http://www.scratchwireless.com/pad/communication-by- generation/,last visited on Dec. 10th,2014.
  • 8Smartphone Owners Index Higher for Frequent Social Media Usage, available at http://www.edisnresearch.cm/smartphne-wners-index-higher-fr-frequefr-scia1-media- usage-2/,last visited on Dec. 10th,2014.
  • 9By the Numbers: 200+ Amazing Facebook user & Demographic Statistics, available at http.-// expandedramblings.com/index.php/by-the-numbers-17-amazing-facebofa-stats/, By the Numbers: 250+ Amazing Twitter Statistics, available at http.-//expandedramblings.com/index.php/march-2013-by-the- numbers-a-few-amazing-twitter-stats/5/,last visited on Dec. 10th, 2014.
  • 10People v. Harris, 945 N.Y.S,2d 505, 507 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2012).

同被引文献57

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部