期刊文献+

三种心肌标志物联合诊断急性心肌梗死的价值评价 被引量:6

Value of Combination of Three Kinds of Cardiac Markers for Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价心型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)、肌红蛋白(Mb)和心肌肌钙蛋白T(c Tn T)不同组合形式诊断急性心肌梗死(AMI)的效能。方法收集2011年10月至2013年9月来邯郸市中心医院就诊的AMI患者106例作为心肌梗死组,同期进行健康体检的健康者60例作为对照组,分别检测血清H-FABP、Mb及c Tn T的水平。比较三种指标不同组合形式诊断AMI的效率。结果H-FABP+c Tn T+Mb组合形式的诊断效能最高,H-FABP+c Tn T+Mb组合形式的受试者工作特征曲线下面积与H-FABP、c Tn T、Mb、H-FABP+c Tn T及H-FABP+Mb比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与c Tn T+Mb组合形式比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是其曲线下面积仍高于c Tn T+Mb组合。结论 H-FABP+c Tn T+Mb组合形式诊断AMI的效能最高,这种组合形式与实验室信息管理系统联合能为AMI的诊断提供更直观和方便的参考价值。 Objective To evaluate the diagnosis efficiency of heart fatty acid binding protein( H-FABP),myoglobin( Mb) and cardiac tropomin T( c Tn T) as different combination types on diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction( AMI). Methods A total of 106 AMI patients admitted to the Handan Central Hospital from Oct. 2011 to Sep. 2013 were collected as myocardial infarction group,and another 60 healthy people during the same period were included as the control group. The levels of H-FABP,Mb and c Tn T were determined,and then the diagnosis effectiveness of the three indicators as different combination types was evaluated. Results The diagnosis effectiveness of H-FABP + c Tn T + Mb was the highest. The area under curve of H-FABP + c Tn T + Mb was significantly higher than that of H-FABP + c Tn T,H-FABP + Mb,H-FABP,c Tn T and Mb( P〈0. 05),and had no statistically significant difference from c Tn T + Mb( P〉0. 05),however,the area under the curve was higher than c Tn T + Mb. Conclusion The diagnosis effectiveness of H-FABP + c Tn T + Mb is the highest and its combination with the laboratory information management system can provide more direct and convenient references for clinical diagnosis of AMI.
出处 《医学综述》 2015年第6期1092-1094,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 急性心肌梗死受试者工作特征曲线 心型脂肪酸结合蛋白 肌钙蛋白T 肌红蛋白 Acute myocardial infarction Receiver operating characteristic curve Heart-fatty acidbinding protein Troponin T Myoglobin
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1中华医学会心血管病分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,《中国循环杂志》编辑委员会.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华新血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725.
  • 2Chu WW,Dieter RS,Stone CK.A review of clinically relevant cardiac biochemical markers[J].WMJ,2002,101(3):40-48.
  • 3Choromańska B,My liwiec P,Dadan J,et al.The clinical significance of fatty acid binding proteins[J].Postepy Hig Med Dosw(Online),2011,65:759-763.
  • 4Solymoss BC,Bourassa MG,Wesolowska E,et al.The role of cardiac troponin T and other new biochemical markers in evaluation and risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain syndromes[J].Clin Cardioc,1997,20(11):934-942.
  • 5Weber M,Bazzino O,Navarro Estrada JL,et al.Improved diagnostic and prognostic performance of a new high-sensitive troponin T assay in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J].Am Heart J,2011,162(1):81-88.
  • 6蒋知新,李美芹,衣志勇,孙玉发,郭广宏.H-FABP、NT-proBNP、cTnT和CK-MB在急性心肌梗死早期诊断中的价值比较[J].临床军医杂志,2012,40(3):529-531. 被引量:11
  • 7Seino Y,Tomita Y,Takano T,et al.Office cardiologists cooperative study on whole blood rapid panel tests in patients with suspicious acute myocardial infarction:comparison between hear-type fatty acid-binding protein and troponin T tests[J].Circ J,2004,68(2):144-148.
  • 8蔡永林,郑裕明,成积儒,李军,莫永坤,钟青燕.应用基于Logistic回归的ROC曲线评价鼻咽癌EB病毒抗体联合检测[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2009,23(5):384-387. 被引量:9

二级参考文献28

  • 1史玉水,胡守珍.血浆脑钠肽在诊断心力衰竭中的价值[J].临床军医杂志,2005,33(1):47-48. 被引量:5
  • 2胡维维,宗永生,李凤萍,李广民,钟碧玲,张敏,梁英杰,顾耀亮,陈跃龙.六种抗EB病毒抗体检测在鼻咽癌血清学诊断中的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(14):795-798. 被引量:27
  • 3任军,张晓梅,张晓光,李红霞,周玲,曾毅.以Rtac2/3为抗原用于鼻咽癌病人检测的初步研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2006,26(11):1057-1059. 被引量:31
  • 4陈卫中,潘晓平,倪宗瓒.logistic回归模型在ROC分析中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(1):22-24. 被引量:54
  • 5Feng P, Chan SH, Rachel Soo MY, et al. Antibody response to Epstein-Barr virus Rta protein in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer, 2001, 92: 1872-1580.
  • 6Cheng WM, Chart KH, Chen HL, et al. Assessing the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma on the basis of EBV antibody spectrum. Int J Cancer, 2002, 97: 489-492.
  • 7Brooks L, Yao QY, Rickinson AB, et al. Epstein-Barr virus latent gene transcription in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells: coexpression of EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 transcripts. J Virol, 1992, 66: 2689- 2697.
  • 8Feng P, Ren EC, Liu D, et al. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus lytic gene BRLF1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: potential use in diagnosis. J Gen Virol, 2000, 81: 2417-2423.
  • 9Hiu MM, Allday MJ, Hara T, et al. Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in an nasopharyngeal carcinoma-related tumour. EMBO J, 1989, 8: 2639-2651.
  • 10Chen H L, Lung M M, Sham J S, et ah Transcription of BamH Ⅰ-A regionof the EBV genome in NPC tissues and B cells. Virology, 1992, 191 : 193-201.

共引文献18

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部