期刊文献+

区域货币一体化、资本流动与服务业增长 被引量:1

Regional Monetary Integration,Capital Movement and Service Industry Growth
原文传递
导出
摘要 自贸区框架下人民币国际化对服务业开放的影响是近来理论研究的热点问题,本文通过将隐性贸易成本引入静态货币一体化模型,建立起货币同盟、服务业与服务贸易三者之间的联系,进而在服务业均衡增长路径上考察区域货币一体化对服务业和服务贸易相关性的影响。研究发现:(1)区域货币一体化会通过降低隐性贸易成本促进服务贸易发展;(2)区域货币一体化与服务业增长正相关,与服务贸易和产业的协调性负相关;(3)货币一体化效应对服务业发展水平影响较低,对市场开放度较弱的国家影响更大。实证部分采用跨国行业面板数据对三者关系进行了研究,结果支持上述结论。文章最后提出我国服务业产业结构升级与贸易结构优化协调推进的政策建议。 By introducing invisible trade cost into static Monetary Integration Model,this paper set up the connection of common currency,service industry and service trade. Furthermore,we also observe the dynamic effect of monetary integration on service industry and service trade on the balanced growth path of service industry. The study discovered:( 1) Common currency will promote service trade through bringing down the invisible trade cost;( 2) on the balanced growth path of service industry,monetary integration is positively correlated with service growth,negatively correlated with the connection of service industry and service trade;( 3) these two effects are particularly stronger for less developed countries with service industry and less open countries. Based on data from service industries,we empirically study the relations of the three,and the result support the above conclusion. Finally the suggestions to coordinate the upgrading of service industry and service trade are proposed accordingly.
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期21-32,共12页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 国家社科基金项目"新国际分工视角下服务业与服务贸易协调机制研究"(项目编号:13CJY093) "中国(上海)自由贸易试验区服务业负面清单管理模式研究"(项目编号:14CJY003) 国家社科基金项目(项目编号:14CJY055)的阶段成果 安徽省高校省级人文社科研究项目"中国贸易失衡影响因素的动态变化机制研究"(项目编号:SK2012B001) 首都经济贸易大学特大城市经济社会发展研究协同创新中心的资助
关键词 最优货币区 隐性贸易成本 市场竞争结构 均衡增长路径 双重差分 optimum currency area invisible trade cost structure of competition balanced growth path DID
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1I Partridge, M. and D. Rickman,2005, "Regional Cyclical Asymmetries in An Optimal Currency Area:An Analysis Using US State Data", Oxford Economic Papers ,57 (3) :373--397.
  • 2Krugman, P., 1991, "Target Zones and Exchange Rate Dynamics", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (3): 669-682.
  • 3Alberto, A. , and R. Barro,2002, "Currency Unions", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2) :409-436.
  • 4Rose, A. and P. Honohan,2001, "Currency Unions and Trade :The Effect Is Large", Economic Policy, 16(33 ) :433-- 461.
  • 5Gale, D. and X. Vives ,2002, "Dollarization, Bailouts, and the Stability of the Banking System", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2) :467--502.
  • 6Akiba, H. , 2007, "Monetary Union, Real Exchange Rate, and Welfare", Journal of Economic Integration, 22 (4) : 748--779.
  • 7Arturo, B. , Y. Koskinen, and M. Nilsson,2009, "The Euro and Corporate Valuations", Review of Financial Studies, 22(8) :3171--3209.
  • 8Micco, A. , E. Stein and G. Ordonez,2003, "The Currency Union Effect on Trade:Early Evidence from EMU', Eco- nomic Policy, 18:315 - 356.
  • 9Gianluca, C. ,2011, "Rose Effect versus Border Effect: The Euro's Impact on Trade", Applied Economics,43: 1691--1702.
  • 10Markusen, J. , Rutherford, F. and Tarr, D. ,2005, "Trade and Direct Investment in Producer Services and the Domes- tic Market for Expertise", Canadian Journal of Economics, 38:758--777.

二级参考文献39

共引文献44

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部