期刊文献+

基于改进学校办学成果的评价——兼论OECD的教师评价政策 被引量:5

The Evaluation and Assessment on Improving School Outcome:Review on the OECD Teacher Appraisal System
原文传递
导出
摘要 教师评价政策影响着教师的专业发展,教师专业发展影响着教学的质量,而教学质量又与学生学业成绩和学校办学成果相关。为培养21世纪的教师,OECD对其成员国的教师评价政策进行了系统的调查研究,调查发现教师评价政策的制定与核心内容体系构建,是为了通过促进教师的专业发展的方式,改进学校办学成果。结合OECD的经验,我国教师评价政策应平衡中央与地方的管理、协调改进与问责、统一教师发展阶段与评价方式。 School appraisal system is related to the professional development of teachers, which attects the teaching quality, while teaching quality is related with the students academic performance and school outcome. In order to cultivate the 21st century teachers, OECD investigated the teacher appraisal system around its member countries. According to the investigation, it showed that the purpose of making teacher appraisal system and constructing the core system was to improve school outcome by professional development. From the experience of OECD, the Chinese teacher appraisal system should focus on the balance of centralization and decentralization, coordinate the improvement and accountability functions, and unify the teachers stage of development and appraisal approaches.
作者 胡伟 张茂聪
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期80-85,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 国家社会科学基金"十二五"规划2012年度教育学一般课题"我国县域基础教育政策评估体系的构建研究"(课题编号:BFA120035)的研究成果
关键词 办学成果 OECD 教师评价政策 教学质量 school outcome OECD Teacher Appraisal System teaching quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1曾晓东,崔世泉.OECD对发达国家教师继续教育政策的分析:框架和主要结论[J].比较教育研究,2008,29(3):41-45. 被引量:8
  • 2OECD. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009 [ R/OL] (2009-07-21) [2014-06-10 ]http:// dx.doi.or/10.1787/9789264068780-en.
  • 3Santiago P, I)onaldson G, Herman J, Shewbridge C. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Australia [ R ]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011 : 16.
  • 4Bratton J, Gold J. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice [ M ]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994: 237.
  • 5Mead S, Rotherham A, Brown R. The Hangover: Thinking About the Unintended Consequences of the Nation's Teacher Evaluation Binge, Teacher Quality 2.0[R]. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 2012: 9.
  • 6Papay J P. Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation[J]. Harvard Educational Review, 2012, 82(01): 123-141.
  • 7MacBeath J. Schools Must Speak for Themselves: The Case for School Self-evaluation[M]. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005:5.
  • 8Darling-Hammond L. The Right Start: Creating a Strong Foundation for the Teaching Career[J]. Phi Delta Kappan,2012, 94(03): 8-13.
  • 9OECD. The Experience of New Teachers: Results from TALIS 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012[R/OL](2012- 02-29) [ 2014-06-10 ] http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 978926d120952-en.
  • 10OECD. Improving Schools: Strategies for Action in Mexico. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010[R/OL](2010-09-30)[2014- 06-10 ]http://dx.doi.or,/10.1787/9789264087040-en.

二级参考文献23

共引文献56

同被引文献113

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部