期刊文献+

基于支付能力原则下CEDS的全球合作减排机制探究

A Study on the Reduction Mechanism of Global Cooperation under the Principle of Capacity to Pay Based on CEDS
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章基于支付能力原则提出一种国际差异化协调碳税政策(CEDS),在此政策下一国碳税税率与其人均GDP水平正相关;采用环境版全球贸易分析模型,定量地评估CEDS的减排效果和对不同区域的经济影响。结果表明:相比于碳关税政策,CEDS减排效果更为明显,世界碳泄露较小;与碳关税政策相比,实施全球合作的CEDS政策,世界总的GDP和居民福利均有不同程度的改善;特别的,绝大多数发展中国家福利损失较小;发展中国家基于CEDS在国内减排,也能在一定程度上降低发达国家关于单方面减排措施所导致的竞争力损失的担忧。 Based on the principle of capacity to pay, the paper proposes an international carbon tax policy (CEDS), and there positive correlation between carbon tax and its GDP per capita. Using environmental edition model of the global trade, the paper makes an analysis of quantitative assess- ment of CEDS emission reduction effect and economic effect in different regions . The results show that, compared with the carbon tariff policy, CEDS emission reduction effect is more obvious, and the world carbon leakage is small; compared with the carbon tariff policy, the implementation of the global cooperation of CEDS policy, imploves, the world's total GDP and household welfare. The vast majority of the developing countries have small welfare loss and their domestic emission reduc- tion; based on CEDS.
作者 刘小伟
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期99-113,共15页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词 碳关税 国际协调碳税 全球贸易分析模型 支付能力原则 Carbon Tariff International Coordination of Carbon Tax Global Trade AnalysisModel Ability to Pay Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Bows A, Anderson K. Contraction and Conver- gence: An Assessment of the CCOptions Model. Climate Change, 2008,91,275-290.
  • 2何建坤,陈文颖,滕飞,刘滨.全球长期减排目标与碳排放权分配原则[J].气候变化研究进展,2009,5(6):362-368. 被引量:69
  • 3Tamiotti L, The Legal Interface between Carbon Border Measures and Trade Rules[J]. Climate Poli- cy, 2011,5, 1202-1211.
  • 4谢来辉.欧盟应对气候变化的边境调节税:新的贸易壁垒[J].国际贸易问题,2008(2):65-71. 被引量:32
  • 5Zhang Z X. The US Proposed Carbon Tariffs, WTO Scrutiny and China' s Responses [J]. International Economies and Economic Policy, 2010, 7(2).. 203 -225.
  • 6Sehelling T C, Some Economics of Global warming [J]. American Economic Review, 1992, 82(1) ..I- 14.
  • 7Nordhaus W D, After Kyoto. Aalternative Mecha- nisms to Control Global Warming[J]. American E- conomic Review , 2006, 96(2):31-34.
  • 8Nordhaus W D. To Tax or Not to TAX.. Alternative Approaches to Slwing Elobal Warming[J]. Revies of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2007, 1 (1) .. 26-44.
  • 9Uzawa H. Global Warming, Proportional Carbon Taxes, and International Fund for Atmospheric Sta- bilization[J]. Review of Development Economics, 2010, 4(1), 1-19.
  • 10Matsumoto K, Fukuda T. Environmental and Eco- nomic Analyses of the Carbon Tax Based on the Im- puted Price Using Applied General Equilibrium Model: Taxation on the Upper Industrial Sectors [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2006,8(1): 89-102.

二级参考文献165

共引文献259

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部