期刊文献+

二维和三维超声测量单卵泡直径的一致性研究 被引量:5

Research on the consistency of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography in diameter measurement of single follicle
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的三维超声自动容积测量逐步在临床应用中表现出众多优点,并成为超声医学的一个重要发展方向。文中评估二维和三维超声对于单卵泡直径测量的一致性。方法对438枚单卵泡发育的卵泡分别进行二维超声和三维超声方法的测量,记录所得的二维直径、三维平均直径、三维虚拟球径,通过Bland-Altman Plot法对二维直径和三维平均直径、二维直径和三维虚拟球径分别进行一致性评估。结果在二维直径和三维平均直径2种测量方式对于单卵泡直径的测量的一致性分析中,差值的均数d=-1.06 mm,95%Lo A为(-4.82,2.70)mm,95%Lo A的95%CI为(-5.21,3.08),临床可接受一致性区间d±l0为(-3.56,1.44)mm,(-5.21,3.08)mm(-3.56,1.44)mm,一致性不佳;在二维直径和三维虚拟球径2种测量方式对于单卵泡直径的测量的一致性分析中,差值的均数d=-0.07 mm,95%Lo A为(-3.11,2.98)mm,95%Lo A的95%CI为(-3.43,3.29)mm,临床可接受一致性区间d±l0为(-2.57,2.43)mm,(-3.43,3.29)mm(-2.57,2.43)mm,一致性不佳。结论三维和二维超声测量方法对于单卵泡直径测量结果并不一致,但考虑到其在结果获得的客观性与精确性方面较二维超声仍然具有优势,可以为辅助生育技术提供更为精确的帮助。 Objective Three-dimensional(3D) automated ultrasonic volume measurement is becoming favorable in clinical application and turns to be an important direction .The article was to evaluate the consistency of two-dimensional (2D) and three-di-mensional ultrasonography in the diameter measurement of single follicle . Methods 438 single folliculars were respectively meas-ured by the same sonographer in 2D and 3D ultrasonic measurement.2D diameter, 3D mean diameter and 3D virtual ball diameter of every single follicle were recorded , and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the consistency of the results by these two meth-ods. Results In the consistency analysis on the diameter measurement of single follicle by 2D and 3D mean diameter measurment methods, d equaled -1.06 mm, and 95% LoA range covered the range of -4.82 mm to 2.70 mm.95% CI of 95% LoA range,-5.21 mm to 3.08 mm, was beyond the settings of clinical acceptable error limit range , -3.56 mm to 1.44 mm, showing poor consis-tency.Likewise, in the research of the consistency in the measurement of 2D diameter and 3D virtual ball diameter in the diameter measurement of single follicle , d equaled -0.07 mm , and 95%LoA range covered the range of -3.11 mm to 2.98 mm.95%CI of 95%LoA range, -3.43 mm to 3.29 mm, was beyond the settings of clinical acceptable error limit range , -2.57 mm to 2.43 mm, showing poor consistency . Conclusion 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements in the diameter measurement of single follicle are not consistent.However, considering the objectivity and accuracy of the results , 3D ultrasonography still has an advantage over 2D ultra-sonography , which can provide more acurate aid for assisted reproductive technology .
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第3期290-293,共4页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
关键词 二维超声 三维超声 单卵泡直径 一致性 Two-dimensional ultrasound Three-dimensional ultrasound Single follicle diameter Consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Shmorgun D,Hughes E,Mohide P,et al.Prospective cohort study of three-versus twodimensional ultrasound for prediction of oocyte maturity[J].Fertil Steril,2010,93(4): 1333-1337.
  • 2Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J].Lancet,1986,1(8476): 307-310.
  • 3姚春晓,马晓华,傅宁华,杨斌,魏淑萍,刘萍.三维超声造影评价肾肿瘤的应用研究[J].医学研究生学报,2010,23(3):254-257. 被引量:23
  • 4张桂萍,姚兰辉,赵琴,高军喜,热沙来提.三维容积成像在乳腺肿块诊断中的应用[J].医学研究生学报,2010,23(7):733-737. 被引量:8
  • 5Mercé LT,Barco MJ,Bau S,Troyano JM.Prediction of ovarian response and IVF/ICSI outcome by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2007,132(1): 93-100.
  • 6Ahn HY,Ko HS,Park IY,et al.Three-dim en sional ultrasound diagnosis of the uterin e and adnexal abnormalities[J].Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology,2006,32(5): 233.
  • 7Raga F,Bonilla-Musoles F,Casa EM,et al.Assssment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity[J].Hum Reprod,1999,14(11): 2851-2854.
  • 8Baba K,Ishihara O,Hayashi N,Saitoh M,Taya J,Kinoshita K.Where does the embryo implant after embryo transfer in humans?[J] Fertility and Sterility,2000,73(1): 123-125.
  • 9Rodríguez-Fuentes A,Hernández J,García-Guzman R,et al.Prospective evaluation of automated follicle monitoring in 58 in vitro fertilization cycles: follicular volume as a new indicator of oocyte maturity[J].Fertility and Sterility,2010,93(2): 616-620.
  • 10Deb S,Campbell BK,Clewes JS,et al.Quantitative analysis of antral follicle number and size: a comparison of two-dimensional and automated three-dimensional ultrasound techniques[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2010,35(3): 354-360.

二级参考文献31

  • 1钱超文,徐栋,边晔萍,赵惠琤,陈丽羽.应用三维超声重建成像诊断乳腺癌[J].癌变.畸变.突变,2005,17(6):374-376. 被引量:16
  • 2周世崇,常才,陈敏,曾炜,范亦武.实时三维超声鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(12):906-909. 被引量:50
  • 3沈德娟,杨斌.乳腺癌的超声诊断及其新进展[J].医学研究生学报,2007,20(2):203-205. 被引量:19
  • 4Rosai,Ackerman.回允中,主译.外科病理学[M].第9版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:3.
  • 5Imao T, Egawa M , Takashima H , et al. Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Urol, 2004, 11(11) :948-953.
  • 6Khosrari Shahi P, Castillo Ruela AD, Perez Manga G. Neoplastic angiogenesis [ J ]. An Med Intma,2008, 25 ( 7 ) : 366-369.
  • 7Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A, et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term survival[ J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(6) : 2022-2026.
  • 8Lavisse S, Lejeune P, Rouffiac V, et al. Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced uhrasonography [ J ]. Invest Radiol, 2008,43(2) : 100-111.
  • 9Wang Z, Tang J, An L, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma [ J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007,26(6) : 757-762.
  • 10Sladkevicius P, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses[ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(6) : 874-882.

共引文献78

同被引文献50

  • 1智慧,罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,文艳玲.对乳腺弹性成像5分评分法的进一步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(5):349-351. 被引量:34
  • 2Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, et al. Elastosonog- raphy in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report [J]. Radiol Med, 2005, 110(1-2): 69-76.
  • 3Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB, et al. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial [ J ]. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31 (2) : 281-287.
  • 4Zhou J, Zhou C, Zhan W, et al. Elastography ultrasound for breast lesions: fat-to-lesion strain ratio vs gland-to-lesion strain ratio[J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(12): 3171-3177.
  • 5Fischer T, Peisker U, Fiedor S, et al. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions : raw data-based calculation of strain ratio [ J ]. Ultraschall Med, 2012, 33 (4) : 372-379.
  • 6Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Semi-quantitating stiffness ofbreast solid lesions in ultrasonic elastography [ J ]. Acad Radiol, 2008, 15(11): 1347-1353.
  • 7Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, et al. Significant differen- tiation of focal breast lesions : calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography[ J ]. Acad Radiol, 2010, 17 (5) : 558-563.
  • 8Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et cation of US elastography for al. Breast disease: Clinical appli- diagnosis [ J ]. Radiology, 2006, 239(2) : 341-350.
  • 9Sohn YM, Kim M J, Kim EK, et al. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography. How much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? [ J] J Ultrasound Med, 2009, 28 : 413-420.
  • 10Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale [ J ]. Acad Radiol, 2010, 17(10): 1227-1233.

引证文献5

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部