期刊文献+

经皮微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效分析 被引量:17

Outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结经皮微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的并发症,评估其临床疗效和安全性。方法自2010-05—2011-05采用MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病100例,记录手术时间、出血量、术后下床活动时间、住院时间和手术相关并发症;临床疗效评估采用VAS评分和腰椎JOA功能评分。结果随访时间18~36个月,平均23个月。手术时间95~195 min,平均125 min;出血量150~380 ml,平均210 ml;下床时间5~10 d,平均7 d,住院时间4~15 d,平均7 d;VAS评分由术前5~10分降低到末次随访时0~5分;JOA评分由术前的6~21分提高到术后23~29分;JOA评分改善率43%~92%,平均79%。2.5%(11/435)发生螺钉位置不良,1.7%(2/120)出现cage位置不良;0.8%(1/120)发生cage再移位;0.8%(1/120)的患者需要输血;2%(2/100)出现深静脉血栓;所有患者均未出现手术部位感染和脑脊液漏。结论采用MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病安全、可靠,并发症较低。 Objective To summarize complications of the minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF) for treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, and assess the clinical outcomes and safety. Methods Between May 2010 and May 2011, 100 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases were treated using MIS-TLIF. The operative time, blood loss, postoperative ambulation time,the length of hospital and surgery-related complications were recorded; clinical outcomes were assessed using the VAS and JOA functional scores. Results The mean follow-up was 23months(18-36 months). The mean operative time, bleeding volume, ambulation time, and the length of hospital were 125 min(95-195 min), 210 ml(150-380 ml), 7 days(5-10 days), and 7 days(4-15 days), respectively. The VAS score improved from preoperative 5-10 points to postoperative 0-5 points; JOA score improved from preoperative 6-21 points to postoperative 23-29 points. The mean JOA improvement rate was 79%(43%-92%). The complications included 2.5%(11/435) screw malposition, 1.7%(2/120) cage malposition, 0.8%(1/120) post-operative cage migration, 0.8%(1/120) of patients requiring transfusions, 2%(2/100) appears deep vein thrombosis. No patients experienced surgical site infection and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Conclusion The rate of complications from MIS-TLIF is low, which is a safe and effective surgery.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2015年第3期269-271,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 微创脊椎手术 经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术 手术相关并发症 Minimally invasive spine surgery Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Surgery-related complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献45

  • 1周跃,王建,初同伟,李长青,郑文杰,郝勇,潘勇,张正丰.内窥镜下单神经孔人路腰椎减压、植骨融合内固定术42例近期临床结果[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(14):967-971. 被引量:15
  • 2Karikari lO, lsaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine, 2010, 35 (26 Suppl): S294 -S301.
  • 3Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, of minimally invasive versus open et al. Comparative effectiveness transforaminal lumbar imerbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2011, 24 ( 8 ) : 479 - 484.
  • 4Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Barnawi A, et al. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci, 2011, 55 (3) : 259 - 264.
  • 5Lee CK, Park JY, Zhang HY. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system: technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2010, 48 (3) : 219 - 224.
  • 6Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19 (2):77 -86.
  • 7Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, et al. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg spine, 2008, 9 (6):570 -573.
  • 8Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 3 (2):98 -105.
  • 9Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg, 2002, 49:499 -517.
  • 10Bagan B, Patel N, Deutsch H, et al. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques. Surg Technol Int, 2008, 17:281 -286.

共引文献145

同被引文献116

  • 1Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Tsuji H,et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologie and enzymatic analysis [J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1996,21(8) :941-944.
  • 2Foley KT,Holly LT,Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fu- sion[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2003,28(15 Suppl):S26-35.
  • 3Bindal RK,Glaze S,Ognoskie M,et al. Surgeon and patient radia- tion exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lundm inter- body fusion[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2008,9(6):570-573.
  • 4Khoo LT,Palmer S,Laich DT,et al. Minimally invasive percuta- neous posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Neurosurgery,2002,51 (5 Suppl) :S166-S181.
  • 5Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF):technical feasibility and initial results[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech ,2005,18 Suppl:S1-S6.
  • 6Byvaltsev V A,Kalinin A A,Belykh E G,et al.Optimization of segmental lumbar spine instability treatment using minimally invasive spinal fusion technique. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research . 2015
  • 7Fritzell P,Knutsson B,Sanden B,et al.Recurrent Versus Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery:Patient-reported Outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research . 2015
  • 8Aizawa T,Kokubun S,Ozawa H,et al.Increasing incidence of degenerative spinal diseases in Japan during 25 years:the registration system of spinal surgery in Tohoku University Spine Society. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine . 2016
  • 9Dean Chou.??Considerations When Contemplating Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(J)World Neurosurgery . 2015 (5)
  • 10吕国华.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的优势及存在的问题[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(5):324-326. 被引量:12

引证文献17

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部