期刊文献+

中国能源碳足迹生态压力变动的因素分解研究 被引量:11

Factor decomposition analysis on the energy carbon footprint ecological pressure change in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 文中在相关能源碳足迹研究的基础上,提出了能源碳足迹生态压力(EPICF)的概念,并对1996-2010年中国能源碳足迹生态压力的动态变化进行了定量分析,结果显示,中国EPICF从0.97hm2/hm2增加到1.96hm2/hm2,增加了2.021倍,现有森林和草地的面积不能够满足日益增加的能源碳足迹。之后,利用LMDI法对其进行因素分解,结果表明,森林和草地的人口压力、能源结构和能源强度3个因素对EPICF的增加起到抑制的作用,经济发展因素起到促进的作用。其中,能源强度因素对EPICF下降的贡献值和贡献率最大,其次是森林和草地的人口压力因素。在影响EPICF变化的诸多因素中,经济因素的促进作用超过其它的抑制因素,经济发展带来的生态压力问题将更加严峻。 Based on related studies of energy carbon footprint, we proposed the concept of EPICF (energy carbon footprint ecological pressure) and made a quantitative analysis on the dynamic change in China's energy carbon footprint ecological pressure from 1996 to 2010. As the result shows, during this period, Chinag energy carbon footprint ecological pressure had increased to 1.96hm2/hm2, which was 2.021 times of that in 1996. The existing forests and grasslands cannot effectively mitigate the increasing energy carbon footprint. Then, we conducted a de- composition analysis with LMDI method and found that all of the three factors: energy structure, energy intensity and the population pressure of forest and grassland contributed to the decrease of EPICF, while economic develop- ment played a positive role. In detail, energy intensity did best in the fall of EPICF, being followed by the popula- tion pressure of forest and grassland. Among all the influencing factors of EPICF, the positive role of economy o- verweighs other inhibiting factors. Economic development deteriorated the problem of ecological pressure.
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期41-46,共6页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 天津大学自主创新基金(编号:60304002)资助
关键词 碳足迹 能源碳足迹生态压力 LMDI法 森林和草地 carbon footprint energy carbon footprint ecological pressure LMDI method forest and grassland
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献147

共引文献579

同被引文献174

  • 1朱向梅,王子莎.中国碳足迹广度空间关联格局及影响因素研究[J].调研世界,2021(5):38-48. 被引量:4
  • 2孟斌,王劲峰,张文忠,刘旭华.基于空间分析方法的中国区域差异研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(4):393-400. 被引量:452
  • 3李智,鞠美庭,刘伟,邵超峰.中国1996年~2005年能源生态足迹与效率动态测度与分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(6):54-60. 被引量:76
  • 4LimH J, Yoo S H, Kwak S J. Industrial C02 emission from energyuse in Korea: A structural decomposition analysis [J]. EnergyPolicy, 2009,37(2): 686-698.
  • 5PetersG P. Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales [J].Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010,2:245-250.
  • 6ShresthaE, Ahmad S, Johnson W, et al. Carbon footprint of waterconveyance versus desalination as alternatives to expand watersupply [J]. Desalination, 2011, 280: 33-43.
  • 7LaurentA, Olsen S I, Hauschild M Z. Carbon footprint asenvironmental performance indicator for the manufacturing industry[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 59(1): 37-40.
  • 8ShresthaE, Ahmad S, Johnson W, et al. The carbon footprint of watermanagement policy options [J]. Energy Policy, 2012,42(1): 201-212.
  • 9ChaabaneA,Ramudhin A, Paquet M. Design of sustainable supplychains under the emission trading scheme [J]. International Journalof Production Economics, 2012, 135(1): 37-49.
  • 10段晓男,王效科,逯非,欧阳志云.中国湿地生态系统固碳现状和潜力[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):463-469. 被引量:252

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部