期刊文献+

厄洛替尼与化疗二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效Meta分析 被引量:10

Efficacy of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in the second-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer:A Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价厄洛替尼与化疗二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的有效性及安全性。方法计算机检索The Cochrane Library(2014年第7期)、Web of Science(1966-2014-07)、EMbase(1900-2014-07)、PubMed(1966-2014-07)、CBM(1978-2014-07)、CNKI(1994-2014-07)和WanFang Data(1989-2014-07),收集厄洛替尼二线治疗晚期NSCLC的临床随机对照试验,2名评价员按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献、提取资料及评价文献质量后,采用RevMan5.2进行荟萃分析。结果最终纳入6个临床随机对照试验,共1 369例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,厄洛替尼与传统化疗相比二线治疗晚期NSCLC患者的无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)(HR=0.98,95%CI为0.86~1.12,P=0.77)和总生存期(overall survival,OS)(HR=0.93,95%CI为0.81~1.07,P=0.31)差异均无统计学意义;亚组分析显示,厄洛替尼与传统化疗在吸烟状况、性别及表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor recepptor,EGFR)野生型患者中PFS和OS差异均无统计学意义;厄洛替尼联合化疗与单纯化疗相比可延长非鳞癌患者的PFS(HR=0.61,95%CI为0.47~0.79,P=0.000 2)和OS(HR=0.71,95%CI为0.54~0.94,P=0.02)。安全性方面,厄洛替尼最主要的不良反应为皮疹和腹泻,与化疗联合使用耐受性良好。结论厄洛替尼对比化疗二线治疗NSCLC在PFS和OS方面并未显示出优势,对于晚期非鳞癌患者来说,厄洛替尼联合化疗可明显延长患者的PFS和OS,厄洛替尼最主要的不良反应为皮疹和腹泻,与化疗联合使用耐受性良好。 OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as sec- ond-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library(Issue 7,2014), Web of Science(1966-- 2014-07), EMbase(1900-- 2014-07), PubMed (1966-- 2014-07), CBM (1978--2014-07) ,CNKI(1994--2014-07) and WanFang Data(1989--2014-07). Data Analyses was conducted using Rev- Man5.2 software. RESULTS The final analysis included six trials,covering 1 396 patients. The results of recta-analyses showed that: erlotinib was not significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) [HR=0.98,95 %CI(0.86--1.12), P= 0.77] and overall survival(OS) [HR= 0.93,95 % CI(0.81 -- 1.07) ,P= 0.31) ]compared with chemotherapy, subgroup analysis showed the PFS and OS in two groups had no significant difference in smoking state and gender as well as in pa- tients with wild-type EGFR~ However, compared with chemotherapy group, erlotinib combined with chemotherapy signifi- cantly improved PFS[HR=0. 61,95% CI(0.47--0.79),P=0.000 2] and OS[HR=0.71,95%CI(0.54--0.94),P= 0. 02)] in second--line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. The main adverse reactions caused by erlotinib were tol erable rash and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS Erlotinib monotherapy in second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer did not show superiority, erlotinib in combination with chemotherapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung canc- er prolongs the patienCs PFS and OS. The main adverse reactions caused by erlotinib were tolerable rash and diarrhea.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第8期637-643,共7页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 新疆医科大学第一附属医院青年专项基金(2012QN10)
关键词 非小细胞肺 厄洛替尼 化学治疗 二线治疗 随机对照试验 Meta分析 cancroid,non-srnall cell lung erlotinib chemotherapy second-line therapy randomized controlled trial Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王应强,王莉,李幼平,李鸿浩,李萃萃,杨晓妍,易敬林,韩金祥,龚磊,陈福宽,周小军,李胜,李安国,孙大勤.江苏省高邮市送桥中心卫生院2010年住院疾病与费用构成调查[J].中国循证医学杂志,2012,12(2):148-155. 被引量:7
  • 2Parmar MK,Torri V, Stewart L, et al. Extracting summary sta- tistics toperform meta-analysis of the published literature for survival endpoints[J]. Stat Med, 1998,17 (24) : 2815-2834.
  • 3Altman DG,Bland J M. Interactionrevisited: the difference between two estimatesD. BMJ, 2003,326(7382) .. 219-224.
  • 4周丽华,刘胜岗,杨红忠,彭毅强,聂华萍,梁伟军,周辉.厄洛替尼联合NP方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效分析[J].肿瘤药学,2014,4(2):126-130. 被引量:2
  • 5Karampeazis A, Voutsina A, Souglakos J, et al. Pemetrexed ver sus erlotinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-smaU celllung cancer : a hellenic oncology research group(HORG) random ized phase 3 study[J]. Cancer,2013,119(15):2754-2764.
  • 6Li N,Ou W,Yang H,et al. A randomized phase 2 trial erolotinib versus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in the treatment of pa- tients with advanced EGFR wild-type and EGFR FISH-positive lung a denocarcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2014,120(30) : 1379-1386.
  • 7Dittrich C,Szekely ZP, Vinolas N, et al. A randomized phase 1 study of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed if- erlotinib as second- line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non small cell lung cancerEJ2. Eur J Cancer,2014,50(8): 1571- 1580.
  • 8Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, et al. Erlotinih versus do cetaxei as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non- small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR) : a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14 (10) : 981 988.
  • 9Lee DH, Lee JS, Kim SW, et al. Three-arm randomised controlled phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed and erlotinih to either pem- etrexed or erlotinib alone as second line treatment for never smokers with non-squamous non small cell lung cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer,2013,49(15) :3111- 3121.
  • 10Kelly K, Azzoli CG, Zatloukal P,et al. Randomized phase 2b study of pralatrexate versus erlotinib in patients with stage I]]B/IV non-small- cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of prior platinum-based thera- py[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2012,7(6) :1041 1048.

二级参考文献20

共引文献7

同被引文献110

  • 1周生余,陈闪闪,刘鹏,罗扬,邢镨元,何静,石远凯,冯奉仪.重组人凋亡素2配体治疗晚期恶性肿瘤Ⅰ期临床耐受性研究[J].中国新药杂志,2007,16(1):71-75. 被引量:3
  • 2安富荣,崔岚,夏玲红.非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗新药——厄洛替尼[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2007,26(10):793-797. 被引量:8
  • 3Becker A,Van Wijk A,Smit EF,et al. Side effects of long- term administration of erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2010,5(9) :1477-1480.
  • 4Halla SN,Amit M,Oza RJ,et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus erlotinib for patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal,and fallopian tube cancer:a trial of the Chicago, PMH, and California Phase II consortia [ J ]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008,110( 1 ) : 49-55.
  • 5Seto T,Kato T,Nishio M,et al.Edotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567) : an open -label, randomised, muhicentre, phase 2 study[J]. The Lancet Oncolagy,2014,15 (ll) : 1236- 1244.
  • 6Montagna E, Cancello G, Bagnardi V, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and edotinib in patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer:clinical and biological activity [J]. Clinical Breast Cancer,2012,12 (3) :207-214.
  • 7Akedey W,Boucher K,Rich N,et al. A phase II study of bevacizumab and erlotinib as initial treatment for metastatic non-squamous,non-small cell lung cancer with serum proteomic evaluation [J ]. Lung Cancer, 2013,79 (3) : 307-311.
  • 8Qi WX, Vitae A, Shen Z, et al.Risk of arterial thromboem- bolic events with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors:an up-to-date meta-analysis [J]. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2014,92 (2) : 71-82.
  • 9Schmidinger M. Understanding and managing toxicities of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors [J]. European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 2013,11 (2) : 172- 191.
  • 10Steingart RM,Bakris GL,Chen HX,et al. Management of cardiac toxicity in patients receiving vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway inhibitors[J]. American Heart Journal, 2012,163(2) : 156-163.

引证文献10

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部