期刊文献+

课程史研究:史观、议题与困扰 被引量:4

The Research of Curriculum History: History View, Topic and Puzzle
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统课程研究是以哲学、社会学和心理学为理论基础的,并不涉及历史的因素,因而缺乏一种深邃的历史视野与厚重的历史关怀。对历史记忆的模糊往往会对当下现实产生虚幻。因此,从历史发展的脉络来推进课程研究,无疑是对"工具理性"课程研究传统的一种突破和创新。在新时期,为深化课程史研究,需确立发展性的进步史观,并对课程科学史、课程文化史等相关核心性议题展开探讨。开展课程史研究是一项极具挑战性的工作,"课程的过去"不值得研究、课程史研究解释力的积弱以及研究方法的褊狭,构成了课程史研究的内在性困扰。 The traditional research of curriculum is on the base of philosophy, sociology and psychology, but does not involve historical factor. Therefore, it lacks a kind of the profound historical view and the massive historical concern. The dim memory of history always has false on the present reality. It is no doubt that advance curriculum research from the context of historical development is a kind of breakthrough and innovation on traditional research of "instrumental rationality". In the new era, in order to deepen the research of curriculum history, the developmental and progressive view of history should be established; what's more, the history of curriculum science and the history of curriculum culture and other related core issues should be discussed. It is extremely challenging work to carry out the research of curriculum history. "The past of curriculum" is unworthy of study, the cumulative weakness of explanatory power of the research of curriculum history and narrowness of research methods contributes the internal problem of the research of curriculum history.
作者 王洪席
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期12-18,共7页 Global Education
基金 作者主持的国家社科基金2013年度教育学青年基金课题"当代过程哲学思潮与中国课程思想及其实践研究"(课题编号:CHA130161)研究成果之一
关键词 课程史研究 发展性史观 核心性议题 内在性困扰 the research of curriculum history the view of developmental history core issues internal problem
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1丹尼尔·贝尔.当代西方社会科学[M].社会科学文献出版社,1988.2.
  • 2Bellack, A.A. ( 1969). History of Curriculum Thought and Practice. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 39, No. 3: 283.
  • 3Kliebard, H. M. (1999). School to Work: Vocationalism and the American Curriculum, 1876-1946. New York: Teachers College Press, 292.
  • 4Goodson, I. (1994).Studying curriculum: Cases and methods. Buckingham: Open University Press, 51.
  • 5钟鸿铭.H M Kliebard的课程史研究及其启示.教育研究集刊,2004,51(1):93-93.
  • 6Kliebardm, H. M. (1986). The Struggle for The American Curriculum, 1893- 1958. New York: Routledge, x,xi-xiii,122,268.
  • 7Kliebardm, H.M. ( 1975). Persistent Curriculum Issues in Historical Perspective. Pinar, W.F. ed. Curriculum Theorizing: The Receptualists. Berkeley: McCutehan, 39-50.
  • 8Kliebardm, H.M. et al. (1983). The Course of the Course of Study: History of Curriculum. Best, J. ed. History Inquiry in Education. American Educational Research Association, 139.
  • 9Kliebard, H.M. ( 1992). Constructing a History of American Curriculum. Jackson, P.W. ed. Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Mcmillan, 157-184.
  • 10Kliebard, H. M. (1992). Forging American Curriculum: Essays in Curriculum and Theory. New York: Routledge, 101.

共引文献18

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部