期刊文献+

施用生物炭抑制塌陷区复垦土壤硝化作用 被引量:22

Biochar addition inhibiting nitrification of reclaimed soils in coal-mining subsidence area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生物炭具有培肥土壤和影响土壤氮素转化的效应,但对于不同肥力尤其是极低肥力的采煤塌陷复垦区土壤氮素转化方面缺乏研究。该文采用室内恒温控湿好气培养的方法,研究生物炭在不同氮肥水平下对肥力差异较大的两种土壤(肥力高的菜地土壤、肥力极低的塌陷区复垦土壤)硝化作用的影响。试验设2种氮肥水平、3种生物炭施用量。结果发现,相对于菜地土壤,塌陷区复垦土壤硝化作用缓慢,土壤最大硝化速率仅为菜地土壤的17.32%,且最大硝化速率出现的时间延迟4.2 d。高氮条件下,土壤硝化作用进行得较慢,施入生物炭后对硝化作用的抑制增强,并使土壤硝化加速阶段延长6 d(塌陷区复垦土壤)至11 d(菜地土壤)。塌陷区土壤尤其在高氮条件下最大硝化速率出现的时间明显随生物炭添加量增加而逐渐延迟,而土壤最大硝化速率不受生物炭及氮肥水平的影响。但菜地土壤土壤最大硝化速率值、最大硝化速率出现的时间值显著受氮肥水平及生物炭施用量影响。因此,生物炭对硝化作用的抑制主要表现在硝化作用的加速阶段,抑制强度受氮肥水平和土壤类型交互作用影响。 The soil structure was severely destroyed, and the content of organic matter and fertility was extremely low in reclaimed soil in the coal-mining subsidence area. How to improve the soil fertility and recover soil productivity was a critical problem for sustainable agriculture in this area. Nitrogen fertilizer was one of the largest amounts of fertilizers used in agricultural production, and the nitrification of ammonium to nitrate was an important nitrogen transformation process in dryland soil. Numerous evidences showed that biochar could improve soil fertility and affect nitrogen transformation in soil. However, little attention was paid to compare the difference in nitrogen transformation affected by biochar addition in soils with different fertility levels, especially in the extremely infertile reclaimed soil in the coal-mining subsidence area. In this paper, the effect of biochar addition on the nitrification in the reclaimed soil from a coal-mining subsidence area was examined by using a laboratory aerobic incubation method with constant temperature and controlled humidity under different nitrogen supply levels. In addition, vegetable soil with high fertility was used as the comparation. The experimental factors included three levels of biochar (0, 1.5% and 3%), two levels of nitrogen (at the rates of 200 and 400 mg/kg, respectively), and two kinds of soil (vegetable soil and reclaimed soil with extremely low fertility). In addition, soils without any biochar or background nitrification information. Nitrate nitrogen nitrogen addition were cultured at the same condition to provide and ammonium nitrogen concentration in soils were monitored during the cultivation period. The variation of nitrate nitrogen concentration in the cultivated soils was simulated by Logistic function and the significance values of the model were analyzed. It showed that, compared with the vegetable soil, the nitrification was slow in the reclaimed soil. The maximum rate of nitrification in the reclaimed soil was only 17.32% of that in the vegetable soil, and the time the maximum nitrification rate occurred delayed 4.2 days in the reclaimed soil compared with the vegetable soil. The inhibition of biochar addition on the nitrification was obvious especially in nitrification acceleration stage, and was affected interactively by nitrogen supply level and soil type. Compared with low nitrogen supply, biochar exerted greater inhibition on the nitrification so that the nitrification acceleration stage extended 6 days (for the reclaimed soil) or 11 days (for the vegetable soil) in the soil with high nitrogen supply. However, the nitrification acceleration stages were all terminated before the 18th day under both of the two nitrogen supply levels. In the reclaimed soil, especially under high nitrogen supply, the time the maximum nitrification rate occurred was obviously delayed as the increasing of biochar amount, but the maximum rate of nitrification was not affected by biochar and nitrogen supply level. However, in the vegetable soil, the value of maximum rate of nitrification was significantly affected by nitrogen or biochar supply. Hence, biochar addition could suppress soil nitrification, and this suppression was especially obvious in the nitrification acceleration stage, which could be affected interactively by nitrogen level and soil type. The outcome of this research will provide a theoretical guide for improving the fertility of the reclaimed soil in the coal-mining subsidence area.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期264-271,共8页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31071868) 教育部高校留学回国人员科研项目 资源植物生物学安徽省重点实验室项目资助(ZYZWSW2014010)
关键词 土壤 硝化作用 生物炭 菜地土壤 soils nitrification nitrogen biochar vegetable soils
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Tim J C, Leo M C. Biochar and the nitrogen cycle:Introduction[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2010, 39(4): 1218-1223.
  • 2Kolb S E, Fermanich K J, Dornbush M E. Effect of charcoal quantity on microbial biomass and activity in temperate soils[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2009, 73(4): 1173-1181.
  • 3王帘里,孙波.培养温度和土壤类型对土壤硝化特性的影响[J].土壤学报,2011,48(6):1173-1179. 被引量:22
  • 4艾娜,周建斌,段敏.不同有机碳源对施入土壤中不同形态氮素固持的影响[J].土壤通报,2009,40(6):1337-1341. 被引量:7
  • 5练成燕,张桃林,王兴祥.有机物料对红壤几种形态碳氮及酸度的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(11):3922-3932. 被引量:15
  • 6Bhupinder P S, Blake J H, Balwant S, et al. Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2010, 39(4): 1224-1235.
  • 7Rezoo T T, Tim J C, Robert R S, et al. Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable[J]. Plant Soil, 2012, 350(1/2): 57-69.
  • 8Kei M, Toshitatsu M, Yasuo H, et al. Removel of nitrate nitrogen from drinking water using hamboo powder charcoal[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 95(3): 255-257.
  • 9Zhang Afeng, Liu Yuming, Qaiser Hussain, et al. Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareousloamy soil from central china plain[J]. Plant Soil, 2012, 351(1/2): 263-275.
  • 10Berglund L M, Deluca T H, Zackrisson O. Activated carbon amendments to soil alters nitri?cation rates[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(12): 2067-2073.

二级参考文献186

共引文献625

同被引文献409

引证文献22

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部