期刊文献+

双重委托代理理论视角下股权集中与研发投资间关系研究——基于托宾Q、现金流和行业调节效应的分析 被引量:4

Impact of Ownership Concentration on the R&D of Listed Company under the Perspective of Dual Agency Theory——Based on the Moderating Effects of Tobin's Q,Cash Flow and Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对我国上市公司股权集中对研发投资的影响在现实和理论中均存在不同表现的现状,基于双重委托代理理论,收集2009-2012年上市公司动态面板数据进行分析。研究结果表明:(1)中国上市公司中股东和经理人之间的委托代理矛盾与大股东和中小股东之间的委托委托矛盾相比较而言,后者比前者更为严重。因此,提高当年的股权集中度不仅会降低当年的研发投资,而且随着股权集中度的增加,当年研发投资降低的速度越来越快,这种影响会持续到第二年,但是影响程度会低于第一年。(2)随着公司市场价值的增加(即托宾Q越大),股权集中度对研发投资的负向影响程度会降低;随着公司现金流的增加,股权集中度对研发投资的负向影响程度会增加;不同行业中股权集中度对研发投资的影响并没有显著的差异性。 In view of the fact that the ownership concentration of Chinese listed companies has different effects on the RD both in practice and in theory,this paper collects 2009- 2011 dynamic panel data of the listed companies to make an analysis based on the dual agency theory. The results are as follows:( 1) Compared with the principal-agent contraditctions,the principal-principal contraditctions are more serious in Chinese listed companies. Therefore,current year's RD investment will not only decrease,but decrease faster and faster with the incerase of the ownership concentration. This effect will continue into the next year,but to a lesser extent.( 2) The negative impact of ownership concentration on RD investment will decrease with the increase of the market value of the company( i. e. the greater Tobin's Q),wheras the negative impact of ownership concentration on RD will increase with the increase of the company's cash flow. However,there is no significant difference in the impacts of townership concentration on RD in different types of industry.
作者 章丹
出处 《财经论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期89-96,共8页 Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71402160) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LQ13G020004 LQ14G020014)
关键词 双重委托代理理论 股权集中 研发投资 dual agency theory ownership concentration R&D
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1冯根福.双重委托代理理论:上市公司治理的另一种分析框架——兼论进一步完善中国上市公司治理的新思路[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):16-25. 被引量:313
  • 2Lee, P. M. , & O'Neill, H. M.. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U. S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives [ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46 (2), pp. 212 - 225.
  • 3Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B.. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2005, 43(3), pp. 655-720.
  • 4杨建君,盛锁.股权结构对企业技术创新投入影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):787-792. 被引量:84
  • 5Jackie D V, Laurin C. , Bozec Y.. R&D activity in Canada: Does corporate ownership structure matter? [J]. Canadian Journal of Ad- ministrative Studies, 2010, 27(2) , pp. 107 - 121.
  • 6Yuan Li, Hai Guo, Yaqun Yi, and Yi Liu. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese firms: The mediating role of learning orientation [ J]. Management and Organization Review, 2010, 6(1 ), pp. 77 - 100.
  • 7任海云.股权结构与企业R&D投入关系的实证研究——基于A股制造业上市公司的数据分析[J].中国软科学,2010(5):126-135. 被引量:199
  • 8Brossar Olivier, Lavigne St6phanie, Saking M. Erdem. Ownership structures and R&D in Europe: The good institutional investors, the bad and ugly impatient shareholders [ J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2013. 22(4), pp. 1031 -1068.
  • 9Hicheon Kim, Heechun Kim, Peggy M. Lee. Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms [ J]. Organization Science, 2008, 19 (3) , pp. 404 -418.
  • 10Choi S B, Lee S H, Williams C. Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China [J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(3), pp. 441-452.

二级参考文献79

  • 1陈隆,张宗益,杨雪松.上市企业公司治理结构对技术创新的影响[J].科技管理研究,2005,25(9):137-141. 被引量:44
  • 2张宗益,张湄.关于高新技术企业公司治理与R&D投资行为的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(5):23-26. 被引量:85
  • 3Hoskisson R E, Hitt M A, Johnson R A, Grossman W. Conflicting Voices : The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45 : 697 -716.
  • 4Nam J, Ottoo R E, Thornton Jr J H. The Effect of Managerial Incentives to Bear Risk on Corporate Capital Structure and R&D Investment [ J ]. The Financial Review, 2003 ( 38 ) : 77 -101.
  • 5Chen H L,Huang W S. Employee Stock Ownership and Corporate R&D Expenditures: Evidence from Taiwan's Information - technology Industry [ J ]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2006,23 : 369 - 384.
  • 6Baysinger B D, Kosnik R D, Turk T A. Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34( 1 ) :205 -214.
  • 7Hansen G S, HiU C W L. Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time - series Study of Four Technology Technology Driven Industries [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991,12 : 1 - 16.
  • 8Aboody D, Lev B. Information Asymmetry, R&D, and Insider Gains [ J ]. Journal of Finance,2000,55 : 2747 - 2766.
  • 9Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agencycosts, and Ownership Structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3:305 - 360.
  • 10Hosono K, Tomiyama M, Miyagawa T. Corporate Governance and Research and Development: Evidence from Japan [ J ]. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 2004, 13:141 -164.

共引文献582

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部