期刊文献+

股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析 被引量:20

Analysis of proximal femoral anti-rotation nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究闭合复位股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定和人工股骨头置换术(FHR)治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法将87例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者分为闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗组(A组,46例)和FHR治疗组(B组,41例),记录两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院天数及Harris髋关节评分的变化。结果 87例患者随访12-28个月。与B组相比,A组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量和住院天数减少(P<0.01);而两组Harris髋关节评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 PFNA内固定在治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果优于FHR的治疗效果。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)internal fixation and femoral head replacement(FHR)in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.Methods A total of 87 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures was randomized into two groups of A(treated by PFNA internal fixation,46cases)and B(treated by FHR,41cases).The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,hospital stay and Harris hip score were compared between two groups.Results Eighty-seven patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months.Compared with group B,the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage and hospital stay were decreased in group A(P〈0.01).However,there was no significant difference in Harris hip score between groups of A and B(P〉0.05).Conclusion Internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with PFNA in the elderly achieves a better result than FHR.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2015年第6期650-652,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK11113)
关键词 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 人工股骨头置换术 股骨粗隆间骨折 Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation Femoral head replacement Intertrochanteric fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Herman A,Landau Y,Gutman G,et al.Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracture fixation by the proximal femoral nail[J].Injury,2012,43(6):856-863.
  • 2D′Arrigo C,Carcangiu A,Perugia D,et al.Intertrochanteric fractures:comparison between two different locking nails[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(12):2545-2551.
  • 3Yuan GX,Shen YH,Chen B,et al.Biomechanical comparison of internal fixations in osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture.A finite element analysis[J].Saudi Med J,2012,33(7):732-739.
  • 4Avakian Z,Shiraev T,Lam L,et al.Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fractures[J].ANZ J Surg,2012,82(1-2):56-59.
  • 5Ooi LH,Wong TH,Toh CL,et al.Hip fractures in nonagenarians-a study on operative and non-operative management[J].Injury,2005,36(1):142-147.
  • 6Hwang JH,Garg AK,Oh JK,et al.A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head:a cadaveric study[J].Indian J Orthop,2012,46(6):627-632.
  • 7Knobe M,Drescher W,Heussen N,et al.Is helical blade nailing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstable pertrochanteric fractures[J]?Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,470(8):2302-2312.
  • 8Zhang PX,Xue F,An S,et al.Clinical analysis of obvious and hidden blood loss in inter-trochanter fracture patients treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw[J].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao,2012,44(6):891-894.
  • 9Tang P,Hu F,Shen J,et al.Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty:a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures[J].Injury,2012,43(6):876-881.

同被引文献158

引证文献20

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部