期刊文献+

高危腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术并发症分析 被引量:2

Postoperative complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in poor-risk patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结高危腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术中及术后常见并发症及其处理措施.方法 回顾性分析安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院2008年1月至2013年12月收治的58例高危肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术的临床资料,对术后并发症及其特点进行分析总结.结果 手术技术成功率为96.6% (56/58),围手术期并发症发生率为32.8%(19/58),其中,全身性并发症发生率为19.0%(11/58),穿刺部位相关并发症发生率为12.1%(7/58),原发内漏发生率为27.6%(16/58).本组51例患者获随访,随访率86.2%.随访时间为1~60个月,平均(20±5)个月.并发症发生率为29.4%(15/51),死亡率为7.8% (4/51),再次干预率为7.8% (4/51).全身性并发症发生率3.9%(2/51),继发性内漏发生率为9.8% (5/51),支架相关性并发症发生率11.8%(6/51).结论 内漏,支架相关性并发症仍是高危腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术后再次手术的主要原因. Objective To review the complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of high-risk abdominal aortic aneurysms in our medical center.Methods Fifty eight elective high-risk EVAR cases from January 2008 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively.Results The technical success rate was 96.6% (56 of 58 patients).The overall complication rate in perioperative period was 32.8% (19/58).Eleven systemic complications (19.0%),16 primary endoleaks (27.6%),7 access of site complications(12.1%) were observed.The follow-up rate was 86.2% (51/58).During the follow up period,the mortality was 7.8% (4/51),the re-intervention rate was 7.8% (4/51).The overall complication rate was 29.4% (15/51),including systemic complications (2/51),secondary endoleak (9.8%) and graft-related complications (11.8%,6/51).Conclusions Endoleak,graft-related complications continue to be the main causes of re-intervention in high-risk aneurysm patients after EVAR.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期231-234,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 主动脉瘤 血管成形术 手术后并发症 危险因素 Aortic aneurysm, abdominal Angioplasty Postoperative complications Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈忠,杨耀国,唐小斌,吴章敏,寇镭,刘晖,王盛,李庆,张征,贾云峰,何楠,吴庆华.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术单中心治疗经验[J].中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(11):892-894. 被引量:7
  • 2Drury D, Michaels JA, Jones L, et al. Systematic review of recent evidence for the safety and efficacy of elective endovascular repair in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm [J]. Sr J Surg, 2005,92(8) :937-946.
  • 3Sidloff DA, Stather PW, Choke E, et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2013,100 ( 10 ) : 1262-1270.
  • 4Grant SW1, Grayson AD, Grant M J, et al. What are the risk factors for renal failure following open elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? [ J 1. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2012, 43 (2) :182-187.
  • 5de Bruin JL, Vervloet MG, Buimer MG, et al. Renal function 5 years after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from a rattdom~zed trlal~ J 1- Br I Sttrg,2013,100 ( l 1 ) : 1465-1470.
  • 6唐骁,符伟国,郭大乔,徐欣,陈斌,蒋俊豪,杨珏,史振宇,竺挺,董智慧,石赟,王利新,王玉琦.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术单中心经验[J].中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(11):895-898. 被引量:7
  • 7Holt PJ, Karthikesalingam A, Patterson BO, et at. Aortic rupture and sac expansion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm [ J J. Br J Surg,2012,99 ( 12 ) : 1657 -1664.
  • 8. Giles KA, Landon BE, Cotterill P, et al. Thirty-day mortality and late survival with reinterventions and readmissions after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries [j]. j Vase Surg, 2011 ,53(1) :6-t2.
  • 9Newton WB 3rd, Shukla M, Andrews JS, et al. Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair~ ~. ] Vase Surg, 2011,54(5) :1244-1250.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Allaqaband S, Mortada ME, Tumuluri R, et al. Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients : a single center experience. J Interv Cardiol, 2004,17 : 71-79.
  • 2Tambyraja AL, Fraser SC, Murie JA, et al. Validity of the Glasgow aneurysm score and the hardman index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg, 2005,92:570-573.
  • 3The United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362:1863-1871.
  • 4De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, et al. Long-term outcome of open endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med,2010, 362:1881-1889.
  • 5Sultan S, Hynes N. Clinical efficacy and cost per quality- adjusted life years of pararenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair compared with open surgical repair. J Endovasc Ther, 2011,18:151-196.
  • 6The united Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2010,362 : 1863-1871.
  • 7White GH, Yu W, May J, et al. Endoleaks as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms : classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg,1997 ,4 :152-168.
  • 8Gilling-Smith G, Brennan J, Harris P, et al. Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification, and strategies for surveiUance and intervention. J Endovasc Surg, 1999,6 : 305 -307.
  • 9Tolia A J, Landis R, Lamparello P, et al. Type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: natural history. Radiology ,2005,235:683-686.
  • 10Jonker FH, Aruny J, Muhs BE. Management of type Ⅱendoleaks: preoperative versus postoperative versus expectant management. Semin Vase Surg,2009,22 : 165-171.

共引文献11

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部