期刊文献+

ⅠA~ⅡB期子宫颈鳞癌预后影响因素的临床分析 被引量:2

Analysis of prognostic factors ofⅠA~ⅡB squamous carcinoma of the cervix
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨ⅠA-ⅡB期宫颈鳞癌患者预后的相关临床高危因素。方法对2004年11月—2013年7月在北京大学人民医院接受广泛/次广泛子宫切除术+盆腔淋巴结切除/取样术的296例ⅠA-ⅡB期宫颈鳞癌患者的临床病理资料进行回顾性分析。结果 296例宫颈鳞癌患者中,按国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2009临床分期:ⅠA期33例,ⅠB期143例,ⅡA期61例,ⅡB期59例。患者3年生存率为96%,5年生存率为87%,总体生存率为87%。单因素分析显示,临床分期、新辅助化疗、脉管内癌栓、宫颈间质浸润深度、宫旁浸润、盆腔淋巴结转移、盆腔淋巴结阳性数目与宫颈鳞癌预后密切相关(P〈0.05);多因素分析显示,盆腔淋巴结阳性数目(P=0.003)及宫颈间质浸润深度(P=0.026)是影响ⅠA-ⅡB期宫颈鳞癌患者预后的独立危险因素。结论ⅠA-ⅡB期宫颈鳞癌患者若盆腔淋巴结阳性数目〉2和(或)宫颈间质浸润深度〉1/2,预后往往较差。 Objective The study aimed to evaluate the high-risk prognostic factors ofⅠA-ⅡB squamous carcinoma of the cervix.Methods The case records of 296 patients withⅠA-ⅡB cervical squamous carcinoma who underwent extensive/sub-extensive hysterectomy+ pelvic lymphadenectomy/pelvic lymph node(PLN)sampling in Peking University People's Hospital from November 2004 to July 2013 were collected,data was analyzed retrospectively.Results Among the 296 cases,33women were in stageⅠ(FIGO stages),143 women stageⅠB,61 women stageⅡA and 59 women were stageⅡ B.Three-year survival rate was 96%,five-year survival rate was 87%and overall survival rate was 87%.Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage,neoadjuvant chemotherapy,lymph vascular space involvement(LVSI),the depth of stroma invasion,parametrial extension,pelvic lymph node metastasis(LNM)and the number of positive pelvic lymph nodes were closely related to the prognosis(P〈0.05).Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the number of positive pelvic lymph nodes(P=0.003)and the depth of stroma invasion(P=0.026)were the independent clinicopathologic factors for prognosis in patients with stageⅠA-ⅡB squamous carcinoma of the cervix.Conclusions Patients with the depth of stroma invasion〉1/2and/or the number of positive pelvic lymph nodes〉2had poor survival outcome inⅠA-ⅡB squamous carcinoma of the cervix.
出处 《中国妇产科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期133-135,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫颈鳞癌 预后 高危因素 盆腔淋巴结转移 宫颈间质浸润 squamous carcinoma of the cervix prognosis risk factors pelvic lymph node metastasis cervical stroma invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statis-tics. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011. 61: 69 - 90.
  • 2郝捷,赵平,陈万青.2011中国肿瘤登记年报.北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012.
  • 3Xu L,Sun FQ, Wang ZH. Radical trachelectomy versus rad-ical hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer: asystematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011,90:1200- 1209.
  • 4Sevin BU, Lu Y, Bloch DA,et al. Surgically defined prognosticparameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma. A multivari-ate survival tree analysis. Cancer,1996,78: 1438- 1446.
  • 5Zreik TG, Chambers JT, Chambers SK. Parametrial involve-ment, regardless of nodal status: a poor prognostic factor forcervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol,1996, 87: 741 - 746.
  • 6Nakanishi 丁,Ishikawa H,Suzuki YI,et al. A comparison ofprognoses of pathologic stage lb adenocarcinoma and squa-mous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol,2000,79: 289-293.
  • 7Kamura T, Tsukamoto N,Tsuruchi N,et al. Multivariateanalysis of the histopathological prognostic factors of cervicalcancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Cancer,1992,69: 181-186.
  • 8谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:133.
  • 9Berek JS. Novak's gynecology. 13th ed. Philadelphia : Lip-pincott Williams Wilkins,2002: 1199 - 1244.

共引文献43

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部