期刊文献+

临床病理学实践中前列腺癌Gleason评分变化趋势 被引量:4

The changing trend of prostate carcinoma Gleason score in clinicopathological practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究临床病理学实践中前列腺癌Gleason评分(GS)变化趋势。方法:系统研究不同时期911例前列腺癌GS、主要分级以及次要分级均值和比例。比较穿刺活检(NB)、经尿道前列腺切除(TURP)以及根治性前列腺切除(RP)标本的差异。结果:1995-2005年前列腺癌GS(6.86±1.12)分,2006-2013年GS(7.06±1.09)分,GS均值显著提高(t=-2.428,P<0.05)。在TURP中GS分别是(6.46±1.38)分和(7.14±1.32)分,GS均值显著提高(t=-2.132,P<0.05)。GS≤5分分别占4.7%(11/234)和0.4%(3/677),GS≤5分比例显著下降(χ2=20.465,P<0.01)。结论:前列腺癌GS均值具有提高趋势。应该使用ISUP系统进行前列腺癌GS。 Objective: To study the trend of change of prostate carcinoma Gleason score (GS) in clinicopathologi- cal practice. Methods:We systematically studied 911 prostate carcinoma in different period, and evaluated the mean level and proportion of GS, primary grading and secondary grading, and compared the difference between needle biop- sy,transurethral resection of prostate and radical prostatectomy. Results:The mean level of GS was (6.86 ± 1.12 ) point in prostate carcinoma in 1995 to 2005 year,and was (7.06 ±1.09) point in 2006 -2013 year. The mean GS significantly increased ( t = - 2.428,P 〈 0.05 ). This indicator in TURP were ( 6.46 ± 1.3 8 ) point and (7.14 ± 1.32 ) point, respectively. The mean GS significantly increased ( t = - 2.132, P 〈 0.05 ). The proportion of GS ≤ 5 was 4.7 % ( 11/234 ) and 0.4% ( 3/677 ), respectively. The rate of GS ≤ 5 significantly decreased ( χ^2 = 20.465, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion:There is an increasing trend in mean Gleason score of prostate carcinoma. ISUP system should be used for prostate carcinoma GS.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2015年第8期1051-1053,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 临床病理学 前列腺癌 GLEASON评分 变化 cliniopathology prostate carcinoma Gleason score changes
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Epstein JI,Allsbrook WJ,Amin MB,et al.The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2005,29(9):1228-1242.
  • 2Pierorazio PM,Walsh PC,Partin AW,et al.Prognostic Gleason grade grouping:data based on the modified Gleason scoring system[J].BJU Int,2013,111(5):753-760.
  • 3Gilliland FD,Gleason DF,Hunt WC,et al.Trends in Gleason score for prostate cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 1993[J].J Urol,2001,165(3):846-850.
  • 4Chism DB,Hanlon AL,Troncoso P,et al.The Gleason score shift:score four and seven years ago[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56(5):1241-1247.
  • 5Zareba P,Zhang J,Yilmaz A,et al.The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice[J].Histopathology,2009,55(4):384-391.
  • 6Zivkovi S,Velickovi L,Kostov M,et al.Relation of serum prostate-specific antigen and the Gleason grade in patients with prostatic carcinoma[J].Vojnosanit Pregl 2003;60:449-454.
  • 7Corcoran NM,Hong MK,Casey RG,et al.Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence[J].BJU Int,2011,108:202-210.
  • 8Lee DH,Chung DY,Lee KS,et al.Clinical experiences of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) according to initial treatment:A study of a korean high volume center[J].Yonsei Med J,2014,55:78-83.
  • 9Richstone L,Bianco FJ,Shah HH,et al.Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years:effect of age on upgrading,upstaging,and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram[J].BJU Int,2008,101:541-546.
  • 10Helpap B,Egevad L.The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens[J].Virchows Arch,2006,449(6):622-627.

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部