期刊文献+

人情味的共同体——20世纪60年代末美国公立大学的组织文化观念 被引量:5

A Collegial Community:Organization Culture of American Public University in 1960's
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用质性研究方法,在大量访谈、编码分析与座谈的基础上,研究案例大学20世纪60年代末的组织文化观念。这一时期,美国公立大学的教学活动受到重视,学术人员可以自主在教学、研究及服务职责间转换工作重点。三种角色在学术人员心目中的重要性与优先地位也不存在明显差异。学术人员普遍认为公立大学的主要使命就是通过高质量的教学活动提高本州公民受教育水平,增强该州经济活力。在此基础上,案例大学的中高层领导运用智慧,致力于建设平等、融洽、开放的横向学术共同体,促进教师的感情融入度,提高他们参与院校治理的热情,为案例大学的可持续发展奠定了坚实的基础。 This research is based on qualitative methodology.After intense interviews,coding and group discussion,the dichotomy of organization cultures of American public universities between late 1960's and early 2000's emerges.This article presents the faculty's understanding of organization culture in 1960's.Coding scheme reveals that in 1960's faculty members serving in American public universities attached greater importance to teaching.Faculty members with different professional priorities were more equally represented in professorship promotion.It was generally agreed among faculty that the mission of public institutions was towards education state citizens.Premised on this popular institutional belief,the leadership in the case university cultivated a collegial culture that attached the faculty members emotionally to each other and thus to the institution.This emotional involvement motivated them in participating in institutional governance.
作者 任玥
出处 《高教发展与评估》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期73-86,111,共14页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 组织文化观念 美国公立大学 学术共同体 organization culture American public university collegial community
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Kerr, C. The Great Transformation in Higher Education, 1960-1980[M]. New York:State University of New York Press, 1991.
  • 2Kerr, C. Higher Education Cannot Escape History : Issues for the Twenty-first Century [M]. New York.. State University of New York Press, 1994.
  • 3Barzun, J. American University: How It Runs, Where It Is Going[M]. New York: Harper & Row,1968.
  • 4Baldridge, J. V. Power and Conflict in the University.. Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations[M]. Stanford, California: Stanford University, 1971.
  • 5Alpert, D.. Performance and Paralysis: The Organizational Context of the American Re- search University[J]. Journal of Higher Education,1985,56 (3):241-281.

同被引文献22

  • 1王保星,张斌贤.“大学教师终身教职”的存废之争——美国大学教师学术自由权利保障的制度分析[J].教育研究,2004,25(9):77-84. 被引量:18
  • 2阎凤桥.学术劳动力市场的特性与研究型大学的教师聘用制度[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(3):64-69. 被引量:36
  • 3唐纳德·肯尼迪.学术责任[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.24、23.
  • 4ALPERT D. Performance and Paralysis: The Organi- zational Context of the American Research University [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 1985,56 (3) : 250- 255.
  • 5AAUP. 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure [A]. J oughin, Louis ed. Academic Freedom and Tenure: A Handbook of the American Association of University Professors [ C ]. Madison : The University of Wisconsin Press, 1 969.33-46.
  • 6Alstete, Jefferey W. Post Tenure Faculty Developmenl: Building A System of Faculty Improvement and Appreciation [M]. Washington, D.C. : George Washington University Press, 2000. 3.
  • 7Finkin, Mattew W. The Case for Tenure [M]. hhaca, NY: ILR Press, 1996; Carlin, James F. Restoring Sanity to an Academic World Gone Mad[J]. Chronicle of Higher Education, 1999. Nov. 5.
  • 8Bok, Derek. Higher Education in America [M].Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2013. 336--337,337.
  • 9Chait, Richard P. ed. The Questions of Tenure [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
  • 10Breneman, David W. Alternatives to Tenure for the Next Generation of Academics [R]. New Pathways: Faculty Career and Employment for the 21st Century Working Paper Series, Inquiry#14 (AAHE Report), Washington, D.C., 1997.

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部