期刊文献+

肝癌前体细胞snail表达与肝癌术后预后相关性研究 被引量:1

Prognostic Value of Hepatpcelluar Carcinoma progenitor cells expressing Snail in patients after Hepatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究通过检测CD44分子和Snail蛋白在HCC中的表达,探究CD44和Snail蛋白与HCC患者临床病理因素以及术后预后的关系。方法利用免疫组化方法检测252名肝癌术后患者癌及癌旁组织CD44和Snail蛋白的表达。结果 CD44阳性表达125例,见于细胞膜和细胞浆,Snail蛋白阳性表达121例见于细胞浆和细胞核。二者阳性表达均显著高于癌旁组织。CD44和Snail蛋白共阳性表达89例,其1-,3-,5年生存率为49.4%,31.5%,24.7%,1-,3-,5年复发率为59.9%,76.6%,81.6%。COX多因素分析中,CD44和Snail共阳性表达是生存复发的独立危险因素。结论 CD44和Snail共阳性表达与肝癌的复发和侵袭性密切相关,可作为预测肝癌患者术后预后的指标。 Objective To investigate the prognositic significance of espressions of CD44 and Snail in patients with hepatocelluar carcinoma ( HCC). Methods Data were retrospectively collected from 252 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between January 2008 and June 2008 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH). The expressions of CD44 and Snail were analyzed by using S-P immunohistoehemical technique. According to the expressions of CD44 and Snail, both positive expressions of CD44 and Snail were defined as positive group. The prognostic risk factors for tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS) of the two group were compared. Results The positive expression of CD44 was located in membranes and cytoplasma, while that of that of Snail was located in cytoplasma and nucleus. The incidence of CD44 and Snail expression were 49.6% and 48.0% respectively, which were statistically higher than the expressions in para-carcinoma tissues. There were 89 patients whose expressions of CIM4 and Snail were both positive. The comparision of clinicalpathological characteristics between the positive and negative groups showed that the positive group had a higer alanine aminotransferase (ALT) , proportion of muliple tumors, pTMN staging, and positive rate for MVI. The postoperative 1-,3-,5-year recurrence rates 49. 4% , 31.5% , 24. 7% for positive group and 74. 8% , 56. 5% , 44. 3% for negetive group. And 1-,3-,5-year survival rates were 59. 9% vs. 40. 8% , 76. 6% vs. 63.6% , 81.6% vs. 68.2% for the two group respectively. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors indicated that positive expression of CD44 and Snail was an independent prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival of overall patients (HR, 1.507, 95% CI, 1.074-2. 114; 1.744, 1.247-2.440). Conclusion Positive expression of CD44 and Snail was closly related to recurrence and invasiveness of HCC, and it may serve as a predictive factor for patients after hepatectomy .
出处 《肝胆外科杂志》 2015年第1期68-72,共5页 Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(No 81372483)
关键词 CD44抗原 SNAIL蛋白 肝细胞癌 预后评估 CD4-4 antigens Snail protein Hepatoeellular carcinoma Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1He G, Dhar D, Nakagawa H, et al. Identification of liver cancer pro- genitors whose malignant progression depends on autocrine IL-6 signa- ling. Cell. 2013 ; 155:384 - 96.
  • 2Zhang P, Hu P, Shen H, et al. Prognostic role of Twist or Snail in various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of clinical investigation. 2014;44:1072 -94.
  • 3Reinke LM, Xu Y, Cheng C. Snail represses the splicing regulator epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 to promote epithelial-mesenchy- real transition. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012 ;287:36435-42.
  • 4Brown RL, Reinke LM, Damerow MS, et al. CD44 splice isoform switching in human and mouse epithelium is essential for epithelial- mesenchymal transition and breast cancer progression. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011 ; 121 : 1064 -74.
  • 5Forsyth CB, Tang Y, Shaikh M, et al. Alcohol Stimulates Activation of Snail, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling, and Biomark- ers of Epithelial - mesenchymal Transition in Colon and Breast Cancer Cells. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2010 ;34 : 19 -31.
  • 6Shin NR, Jeong EH, Choi CI, et al. Overexpression of Snail is asso- ciated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2012 ; 12:521.
  • 7Hwang WL, Yang MH, Tsai ML, et al. SNAIL regulates interleukin- 8 expression, stem cell-like activity, and tumorigenicity of human colorectal carcinoma cells. Gastroenterology. 2011 ; 141:279 - 91, 91.
  • 8Smith BN, Odero-Marah VA. The role of Snail in prostate cancer. Cell adhesion & migration. 2012 ;6:433 -41.
  • 9Miyoshi A, Kitajima Y, Kido S, et al. Snail accelerates cancer inva- sion by upregulating MMP expression and is associated with poor prog- nosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. British joumal of cancer, 2005, 92:252 - 8.
  • 10Warzecha CC, Sato TK, Nabet B, et al. ESRP1 and ESRP2 are ep- ithelial cell-type-specific regulators of FGFR2 splicing. Molecular cell, 2009,33:591 -601.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部