期刊文献+

循环加载对不同桩核修复后牙体抗折强度的影响 被引量:7

In vitro analysis of the effect of cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post and core systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:用循环加载的方式模拟核桩冠修复一段时间后的状况,比较不同桩核修复后牙体的抗折强度,了解其远期修复效果。方法 15颗下颌离体前磨牙随机分为3组,分别为铸造金属桩核组(A组)、玻璃纤维加强复合树脂桩核组(B组)、树脂充填组(C组),每组5个试件。所有试件在完成桩核修复后均做金属冠修复,经过300 000次循环加载和1 000次5~55 ℃冷热循环后,再在力学测试机上测试试件的抗折强度,记录试件断裂时的力值和试件破坏形式。结果 B组和C组抗折强度显著高于A组(P<0.05)。A组主要为不可修复性折裂,其他两组主要为可修复性折裂。结论±临床修复残根残冠时,可以优先考虑纤维桩加树脂核修复或者树脂充填修复。 Objective This study aims to compare the fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post and core systems by cyclic loading test and to predict long-term effects. Methods A total of 15 recently extracted mandibular premolars without crowns were endodontically treated. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups with five teeth in each group. Group A, teeth restored with cast metal post and core. Group B, teeth with fiber post and resin core. Group C, teeth with resin filling. All of the teeth were restored with full-cast metal crowns. The specimens were exposed to 300 000 cyclic loadings in a cyclic loading machine and 1 000 thermal cycles between 5 and 55 ℃. All of the samples were loaded in AG-IS mechanical testing machine with a compressive load until fracture occurred. The fracture load and the fracture mode of each tooth were recorded. Results The fracture resistance in group B and C were higher than that of the cast metal post and core restoration (P〈0.05). Repairable fractures were observed in group B and C, whereas unrestorable and catastrophic fi'actures were found in group A. Conclusion Fiber post and resin filling is a good choice to restore endodontically treated teeth.
作者 李萍 朱智敏
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期206-208,共3页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 循环加载 桩核修复 抗折强度 cyclic loading post and core technique fracture resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Wiskott HW, Nicholls n, Belser UC. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1995,8(2):105-116.
  • 2Hu YR, Pang LC, Hsu CC, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-andcore systems[J]. Quintessence Int, 2003,34(5):349-353.
  • 3Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, et al. Fracture resistance of pulp less teeth restored with post-cores and crowns[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(5):477-485.
  • 4Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading],l], J Prosthet Dent, 2006, 95(2): 130-136.
  • 5Stricker EJ, Gohring TN. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2006, 34(5):326-335.
  • 6Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, et al. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2005, 32(6):433-440.
  • 7Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y, et al. In vitro evaluation ofthe fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007,97(2):93-98.
  • 8Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Proschel P. Evaluation ofload testing of postendodontic restorations in vitro: linear compressive loading, gradual cycling loading and chewing simulation[J]. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 2005, 74(2):829-834.
  • 9Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2003,16(1):39-44.
  • 10Baratieri LN, De Andrada MA, Arcari GM, et al. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2000, 84(2): 180-184.

同被引文献44

  • 1陈湘涛,李晓娜,关振群,刘晓光,顾元宪.桩核材料对牙本质应力分布的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2004,39(4):302-305. 被引量:69
  • 2李焕云,熊曦州,李晓红.改向铸造桩核烤瓷冠修复个别前牙错的美学探讨[J].中国美容医学,2005,14(3):338-339. 被引量:4
  • 3肖洁,何惠明,孔亮,周冰,张爱君.下颌前磨牙不同角度桩核冠的三维有限元应力分析[J].口腔医学,2006,26(3):223-225. 被引量:5
  • 4段明丽,陈树国,沈文静,张钊,陈森.不同桩核系统修复对根管治疗牙的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2007,21(3):304-306. 被引量:19
  • 5皮昕.口腔解剖生理学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,30
  • 6Mangani F, Marini S, Barabanti N, The success of indirect restorati posterior teeth: a systematic review literature[J]. Minerva Stomatol 2015 et, al. ons in of the 64 (5) :231-40.
  • 7Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than retained restorations? A systematic meta-analysis [J]. J gndod, 2015, 4t (3 fiber post- review and ):309-316.
  • 8刘诗铭,刘玉华,吕轩,等.五种形态牙本质肩领对上颌前磨牙桩核冠修复后应力分布影响的三维有限元研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2015,47(S1):162-166.
  • 9Lefever D, Gregor L, Bortolotto T, et al. Supragingival relocation of subgingivally located margins for adhesive inlays/onlays with different materials [J]. J Adhes Dent,2012, 14(6):561-567.
  • 10Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations : preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months [J ]. J Endod, 2009,35 ( 11 ) : 1477-1482.

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部