期刊文献+

词块的语义信息加工与认知心理研究 被引量:2

The Semantic Information Processing and Cognitive and Psychological Research of Formulaic Language Acquisition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用文献综述法,概述了最新研究中的词块语义信息加工特点,并从认知心理和语义加工层面,以影响词块语义信息加工的主要因素为突破口,归纳出频率效应、语音短时记忆容量、词汇知识量和工作记忆广度四个最主要因素。由于后两个因素在相关研究中缺乏足够数据,继而文章采用实证研究法,通过生成性词汇知识测试和运算广度任务测试分别对测试者进行高分组和低分组分配,考察两组高分组和低分组对词块语义加工的影响。经过产出性语篇词块测试,t检验和方差关联度分析,结果表明:词汇知识量和工作记忆容量对词块语义加工过程都有影响,但词汇知识量的影响力较弱;且两因素间表现为非线性关系;关联度对词块的习得效果解释力也较小。 Based on the process of literature review,this article outlines the latest research on the semantic information processing characteristics of formulaic language,and find out the main factors that affect semantic processing as a breakthrough. We conclude the most important four factors: frequency effects,phonological short- term memory capacity,the amount of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span. Since the last two factors lacking of adequate research data,this article uses empirical research method. Throng productive vocabulary knowledge testing and operational span tasks,the high and low groups are grouped. Based on the productive discourse chunks test,t test and variance correlation analysis,the results show that: both of the two factors have an impact on the semantic processing process,but the influence of the vocabulary knowledge is weak; there is a non- linear relationship between factors and the explanatory power of the correlation effects on the acquisition of chunks is small.
作者 郭高攀
出处 《东华理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第1期47-52,共6页 Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 江西省高校人文社会科学项目(YY1202)
关键词 词块 语义信息加工 词汇知识量 工作记忆容量 formulaic language semantic processing vocabulary knowledge working memory span
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Wray, A. What Do We (Think We) Know About Formu-laic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play[J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2012 (32):231-254.
  • 2Sinclair, J. M. . Collocation: A progress report. In R.Steele & T. Threadgold ( Eds. ),Language topics : Essaysin honour of Michael Halliday [ C ]. Amsterdam, theNetherlands : John Benjamins, 1987.
  • 3Underwood, G.,Schmitt, N.,& Galpin, A. The eyeshave it : An eye-movement study into the processing of for-mulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt ( Ed. ),Formulait- se-quences [C] . Amsterdam, the Netherlands : John Benja-mins, 2004.
  • 4Conklin, K.,& Schmitt, N. The Processing of formulaiclanguage [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,2012 (32):45-61.
  • 5Siyanova-Chanturia, A. , Conklin, K.,and Schmitt., N.Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idi-om processing by native and nonnative speakers [ J]. Sec-ond Language Research, 2011(27) : 1-22.
  • 6Wray, A. Formulaic language and the lexicon [ M]. Cam-bridge ,UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 7Wray,A. Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries[M ] . Oxford,UK : Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • 8Ellis, N. C. Formulaic Language and Second LanguageAcquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear [ J]. Annu-al Review of Applied Linguistics, 2012 (32) : MAA.
  • 9O’Brien, I.,Segalowitz, N.,Collentine, J.,& Freed,B. Phonological memory predicts second language oral flu-ency gains in adults [ J ]. Studies in Second Language Ac-quisition ,2007(29) :557-581.
  • 10Hummel, K. M. Aptitude, phonological memory, andsecond language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2009(30) :225-249.

二级参考文献43

共引文献826

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部