期刊文献+

小面积探头测量人体压痛阈影响因素及正常参考值调查 被引量:4

A SURVEY OF FACTORS IN RELATION TO PRESSURE PAIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE SMALL 0.1-cm^2 PROBE AND ITS NORMAL REFERENCE RANGES IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析0.1 cm2小面积探头用于压痛阈测量的影响因素,并计算其正常参考值。方法:以武汉某校男女各50名健康在校大学生为受试者,采用0.1 cm2探头的压力测痛仪,选定右侧前臂两个测痛点,测量两处皮脂厚度、压痛痛觉和耐痛阈值,然后分析影响压痛阈的因素并计算其正常参考值。结果:女性受试者两测痛点处压痛阈值比男性低(P<0.001);各测痛点压痛阈值与测痛点处皮脂厚度(P<0.05)呈正相关;纳入受试者测痛点1处压痛阈值低于测痛点2(P<0.001);通过计算得到不同性别受试者两测痛点处压痛阈值95%正常参考值。结论:0.1 cm2探头用于压痛阈测量受到性别、测痛点深部组织结构及皮脂厚度的影响;本研究所得的正常参考值可为今后0.1 cm2探头用于临床压痛测量提供一定参考。 Objective: To investigate and analyse the possible factors on pressure pain measurement via pressure algometer with the small 0.1 cm2 size probe and to establish the normal reference values of pressure pain threshold(PPT)and pressure pain tolerance(PTO). Methods:50 male and 50 female healthy volunteers were recruited in this study. PPT and PTO were measured at lateral brachioradialis of lateral elbow joint(point 1) and midpoint of medial and lateral borders of wrist(point 2) with a pressure algometer with the 0.1 cm2 size probe. Cortical thickness of the two points were also measured. Factors affecting pressure pain were measured and the normal reference ranges of PPT and PTO calculated. Results: Females experienced lower PPT and PTO than males at the two points(P〈0.001). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the PPT and PTO were positively correlated with genders(P〈0.001) and cortical thickness of the test point(P〈0.05), respectively. PPT and PTO at point 1 was lower than that at point 2(P〈0.001). In addition, we obtained normal reference values(kg/cm2)of PPT and PTO at the two points of 100 healthy volunteers. Conclusion: Both the PPT and PTO measurement with the 0.1 cm2 size probe might be affected by gender and the cortical thickness of the point. Point 2 might be more appropriate for pressure pain measurement in the clinical studies. The normal reference ranges of the PPT and PTO at the specific points for volunteers could be served as a reference for pressure pain measurement.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第3期189-193,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81271235)
关键词 压痛 探头表面积 痛觉阈 耐痛阈 正常参考值 Pressure pain Probe size Pain threshold Pain tolerance Reference ranges
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1彭慕云,杨晓苏.疼痛性别差异机制的研究进展[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2013,19(11):690-692. 被引量:31
  • 2Duan G, Xiang G, Zhang X, et al. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in SCN9A may decrease postoperative pain sensitivity in the general population. Anesthesiology, 2013, 118:436 - 442.
  • 3Verberne WR, Snijders TJ, Liem KS, et al. Applications of quantitative sensory testing. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 2013, 157:A5434.
  • 4陈祢,郭铁成,许惊飞,韦春霞.手持式压力测痛仪的信度及效度检验[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2009,31(10):690-693. 被引量:16
  • 5Gustorff B, Sycha T, Lieba-Samal D, et al. The pattern and time course of somatosensory changes in the human UVB sunburn model reveal the presence of peripheral and central sensitization. Pain, 2013, 154:586 - 597.
  • 6Duan G, Xiang G, Zhang X, et al. An Improvement of Mechanical Pain Sensitivity Measurement Method: The Smaller Sized Probes may Detect Heterogeneous Sensory Threshold in Healthy Male Subjects. Pain Med, 2014, 15:272 - 280.
  • 7Zhang Y, Zhang S, Gao Y, et al. Factors Associated with the Pressure Pain Threshold in Healthy Chinese Men. Pain Med, 2013, 14:1291 - 1300.
  • 8段光友,张咸伟.健康在校大学生压痛阈正常参考值调查[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(7):448-451. 被引量:7
  • 9Chen CC, Johnson MI. An investigation into the hypoa- lgesic effects of high-and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally- induced blunt pressure pain in healthy human particip- ants. J pain, 2010, 11:53 - 61.
  • 10Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA, et al. A systematic literature review of 10years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception-Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? Pain, 2012, 153:602 - 618.

二级参考文献47

  • 1张奋耿,梁向坚,张继平,安启升,张有剑.弹簧式压力测痛仪在肱骨外上髁炎诊断中的应用[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2006,12(6):557-559. 被引量:2
  • 2Fisher AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain, 1987, 30: 115-126.
  • 3Jensen K, Andersen HO, Olesen J,et al. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region: evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain ,1986, 25 : 313-323.
  • 4Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB. Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain, 1986, 24: 313-321.
  • 5Nussbaum EL, Downes L. Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days. Phys Ther, 1998, 78 : 160-169.
  • 6Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehab Med, 1998, 30: 3- 8.
  • 7Persson AL, Brogardh C, Sjolund BH. Tender or not tender: test-retest repeatability of pressure pain thresholds in the trapezius and deltoid muscles of healthy women. Rehabil Med, 2004, 36: 17-27.
  • 8Chestertona LS, Barlasb P, Fosterb NE, et al. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain,2003, 101:259- 266.
  • 9Chesterton LS, Sim J, Wright CC, et al. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain, 2007, 23:760-766.
  • 10Laursen BS,Bajaj P,Olesen AS,et al.Health relatedquadity of life and quantitative pain measurement in females with chronic non-malignant pain.Eur J Pain,2005,.9:267-275.

共引文献51

同被引文献63

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部