期刊文献+

成年监护制度的现代转向 被引量:141

The Modern Transition of Adult Guardianship System
原文传递
导出
摘要 从世界范围看,成年监护制度目前清晰地呈现出以下发展趋势:从医疗监护模式转向人权监护模式,从全面监护转向部分监护,制度利用者扩大化,保护与支援措施多元化,意定监护为主法定监护为辅。我国成年监护制度立法尚滞后于现代世界主流成年监护制度发展趋势,作为《联合国残疾人权利宣言》的签署国,我国应结合老龄化社会的发展实际,顺应当前国际趋势,确立人权监护模式的成年监护制度,以尊重自我决定、最小限制和能力推定为原则,并扩张制度的利用者范围,以意定监护契约为监护主要设定方式。在法定监护中确立有限监护的中心地位,并在此基础上新设监护、保佐与辅助三种措施。同时完善《老年法》第26条,建立起以吸收《精神卫生法》和相关行政规范为重要组成部分的监护监督体系。 After 60 years worldwide reform, adult guardianship system presents the trends clearly as follows : the model of guardianship has changed from medical care to human rights ; the range of guardianship has transformed from overall guardianship to partial guardianship; the number of users has enlarged; measures of protection and support have diversified; and legislations have turned to take voluntary guardianship as principle with the supplement of legal guardianship. However, the adult guardianship system in China still falls behind the mainstream around the world. So, as a signatory to the Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons, the legislation in China should base on our aging reality, comply with current international trends, and then establish an adult guardianship system adapting human rights guardianship model ; employing the principle of respect for self-decision, minimum limit, and capacity presumption; expanding scale of adult guardianship as main pattern position of limited supervision guardianship users; and taking voluntary of guardianship. Meanwhile, in legal guardianship, and set we should establish the center up a measure system consists of guardianship, protection and assist. Correspondingly, improving the judicial interpretation of the Elder Law, article 26 ; and building up a supervision system of guardianship which takes Mental Health Act and relevant administrative rules as important parts.
作者 李霞
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期199-219,共21页 China Legal Science
基金 作者主持的司法部国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目"精神卫生立法研究"(项目批准号:10SFB1006))的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1Wolf Wolfensberger and Stephen Tullman,A Brief Outline of the Principle of Normalization,27(3)Rehabilitation Psychology(1982),p.135.
  • 2申政武.《东北亚成年监护国际研讨会发言稿》,杭州师范大学2012年4月28日《东北亚成年监护制度国际会议论文集》(未公开发表).
  • 3The Ireland Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Law and the Elderly(LRC CP23-2003).
  • 4The Ireland Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Vulnerable Adults and Law:Capacity(LRC CP23-2003).
  • 5Christy Holmes,Surrogate Decision-making in the 90’s:Learning to Respect Our Elders,28 University of Toledo Law Review 605(1997).
  • 6《联合国残疾人权利国际公约》.
  • 7Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act,SA2008,c A-4.2,§2(1).
  • 8高一书.《成年监护之意思能力判定》,载《台湾警大法学论集》2007年第13期.
  • 9刘得宽.《成年监护制度之比较研究--以日、台、德为中心》,载《月旦法学杂志》2003年第101期.
  • 10Lawrence O.Gostin&Anna Garsia,Governing for Health as the World Grows Older:Healthy Lifespans in Aging Societies,The Elder Law Journal,Vol.22,p.115.

二级参考文献74

共引文献195

同被引文献703

引证文献141

二级引证文献450

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部