期刊文献+

重塑“不变之道”:甲午战后严复四篇时评研究

Remolding“the Unchanged Dao”:A Study of Yan Fu's Four Commentaries in 1895
下载PDF
导出
摘要 甲午战后严复发表的四篇时评,既批评清流士大夫,又讥讽西学名流,认为两者皆未识西洋大体。在严复看来,西洋民主政治鼓励竞争,允许个人自由发展,所以国富民强。中国只有放弃传统的圣人之治,践行"为我自由,兼爱克己"的不变之道,才能实现个人与国家的双赢。具体的做法是,依赖明君废除八股取士,借助西方格致之学鼓民力、开民智、新明德,使人人自治、自由和自利。严复的思想逻辑自有其深刻之处,但是在实践中却面临着诸多难以化解的困境。 In the four commentaries published after the Sino-Japanese War of 1894—1895,Yan Fu criticized both the scholar-bureaucrats and the celebrities who were proficient in Western learning for their failure to grasp the principles on which the Western nations relied.Yan Fu pointed out that'the unchanged Dao'was'seeking for individual interests and liberties,practicing the principle of self-restraint and all-embracing love'.According to this view,the individual's free development was the foundation of the nation.The Western nations were prosperous mainly because they encouraged the people to compete and develop freely.China became weak and backward mainly because the government prevented people from competing and developing freely.Meanwhile'Yan Fu insisted that China could not adopt the Western democracy immediately because the Chinese people did not have enough ability to realize self-government.They should depend on an enlightened ruler who would reform the imperial examination system and then civilize the people with Western learning which would help them enjoy self-government,liberty and legitimate interests.As a result the nation would become strong and prosperous.Yan's thought is profound,but at the same time is faced with many difficulties in practice.
作者 胡其柱
出处 《政治思想史》 2015年第1期38-55,198,共18页 Journal of the History of Political Thought
基金 教育部社科规划项目"近代中国‘自由’概念研究"(项目编号:12YJA770018)的阶段性成果
关键词 严复 甲午战争 “不变之道” 自由 Yan Fu the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 — 1895 ' the unchanged Dao ' liberty
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1严复.《与陈宝琛书·三》,王拭,主编.《严复集》,第3册,第501页.
  • 2严复.《与陈宝琛书·一》,王拭,主编.《严复集》,第3册,中华书局,1986年,第498页.
  • 3王文仁.《严复与(天演论>的接受,翻译与转化》,(台湾)《成大中文学报》,总第21期(2008年7月),第145-165页.
  • 4李强.《严复与中国近代思想的转型-兼评史华慈<寻求富强:严复与西方)》,载刘桂生,林启彦,王宪明,编.《严复思想新论》,第361-404页.
  • 5王永兴.述陈寅恪先生《论韩愈》之作的重大意义[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,32(3):89-94. 被引量:3
  • 6戴震:《孟子字义疏证》,载《戴震集》,上海古籍出版社1980年,第319页.
  • 7吴展良.《严复早期的求道之旅:兼论传统学术性格与思维方式的继承与转化》,(台湾)《台大历史学报》,总第23期(1999年),第239-276页.
  • 8严复.《与陈宝琛书·二》,王拭,主编.《严复集》,第3册,第499-501页.
  • 9《自主之理》,[英]爱汉者,等编,黄时鉴,整理.《东西洋考每月统记传》,中华书局,1997年,第339-340页.
  • 10胡其柱.《道咸年问来华传教士与“自由”概念之传人》,(香港)《二十一世纪》,总第126期(2011年8月),第64-74页.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部