期刊文献+

298例骨髓增生异常综合征患者染色体核型与临床预后分析 被引量:18

Analysis of the karyotype abnormalities and its prognostic in 298 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的细胞遗传学特点及其与MDS诊断分型、疾病进展和预后的关系。方法回顾性分析2008年6月至2013年10月浙江大学医学院附属第一医院收治的298例MDS患者的临床特征及预后情况,随访观察并进行相关性研究。结果难治性血细胞减少伴单系发育异常(RcuD)18例,难治性贫血伴环状铁粒幼红细胞(RARs)8例,难治性血细胞减少伴多系发育异常(RCMD)104例,难治性贫血伴原始细胞过多(RAEB)-176例,RAEB-285例,MDS不能分类5例,单纯del(5q)2例。染色体异常检出率39.6%,单纯数目异常45例,单纯结构异常31例,42例两种异常同时存在,均为不平衡易位及复杂异常。RAEB组(RAEB-1+RAEB-2)染色体异常检出率及复杂染色体异常检出率均高于非RAEB组(RARS+RCMD+RCUD)(47.2%对29.2%,P=0,002)。根据IPSS.R积分系统分组,除极低危组外,随着危险分层的递增,染色体异常检出率逐渐增加(P〈0.05),且随着IPSS.R积分越高,转化为白血病的概率越高(P〈0.01)。+8染色体异常占所有核型异常的19.5%,在RAEB组+8染色体异常组2年总生存率低于正常染色体组(43%对68%,P=0.005)。结论染色体核型分析是MDS患者判断预后的一个独立因素,对于MDS的诊断、治疗方案的制定及预后判断均有较大意义,+8染色体异常作为中等预后的染色体异常,在RAEB组预后差于正常染色体核型。 Objective To investigate the relationship between cytogenetic markers with World Health Organization (WHO) classification, disease progress and prognosis in cases with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Methods 298 patients with de novo MDS from the first affiliated hospital of medical school, Zhejiang University were enrolled in the retrospective analysis of WHO classification, karyotype, and prognosis. Follow-up study was also conducted. Results The WHO classifications at first diagnosis were as follows: refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD), 18 cases; refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS), 8 cases; refractory cytopenia with multiline dysplasia (RCMD), 104 cases; refractory anemia with excess blasts- 1, 76 cases; refractory anemia with excess blasts-2, 85 cases; MDS unclassified (MDS-U), 5 cases involved; and single del (5q), 2 cases. 39.6% of MDS patients carried karyotypic abnormalities. Among them, the frequency of numerical abnormalities, structural abnormalities and the existence of composite abnormalities were 45, 31, and 42, respectively. The composite abnormalities were unbalanced translocations and complex chromosomal abnormalities. The incidence of both karyotypic abnormalities and complex chromosomal abnormalities inRAEB group was higher than that in non-RAEB group (P〈0. 05). An analysis based on IPSS-R Scoring System showed that advanced risk stratification (except the low-risk group) gradually enhanced the incidence of karyotypic abnormalities (P〈0.05). In addition, the probability of evolution to leukemia increased with the higher IPSS-R score (P〈0.05). In RAEB group, the cases with + 8 chromosome, accounting for 19.5% of karyotypic abnormalities, had worse prognosis than those with normal chromosomes. Conclusions Karyotype was identified with an independent risk factor in MDS patients. Therefore, the information on cytogenetic analysis was critical for diagnosis, prognosis and individual treatment. MDS patients presenting+8 chromosome, an intermediate risk factor, were associated with a poorer outcome compared to cases with normal chromosomes in RAEB group.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期297-301,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(30870914、81270582、81470290、81470305) 卫生公益性行业科研专项(201202017) 浙江省科技厅重大项目(2013C03043-2) 浙江省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(LR12H08001) 浙江省卫生厅支撑学科重点项目(201234445) 浙江省中医药科技计划(2012ZA071)
关键词 骨髓增生异常综合征 核型分析 国际预后积分系统 +8染色体 Myelodysplastic syndrome Karyotyping IPSS-R Scoring System + 8 Chromosome abnormalities
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Schanz J, Tüchler H, Solé F, et al. New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(8):820-829.
  • 2Bernasconi P, Klersy C, Boni M, et al. World Health Organization classification in combination with cytogenetic markers improves the prognostic stratification of patients with de novo primary myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Br J Haematol, 2007, 137(3):193-205.
  • 3Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A, et al. Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(23): 3503-3510.
  • 4Brunning RD, Orazi A, Germing U, et al. Myelodysplastic syndromes//Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris N, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues[M]. Lyon: IARC, 2008:87-107.
  • 5李磷,刘旭平,聂玲,于明华,张悦,秦铁军,肖志坚.原发性骨髓增生异常综合征染色体核型异常特征及其预后意义的研究[J].中华血液学杂志,2009,30(4):217-222. 被引量:25
  • 6Schanz J, Steidl C, Fonatsch C, et al. Coalesced multicentric analysis of 2,351 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes indicates an underestimation of poor-risk cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes in the international prognostic scoring system[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(15):1963-1970.
  • 7Mallo M, Lu?o E, Sanzo C, et al. Clinical impact of the clone size in MDS cases with monosomy 7 or 7q deletion, trisomy 8, 20q deletion and loss of Y chromosome[J]. Leuk Res, 2011, 35(6):834-836.
  • 8Solé F, Espinet B, Sanz GF, et al. Incidence, characterization and prognostic significance of chromosomal abnormalities in 640 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes. Grupo Cooperativo Espa?ol de Citogenética Hematológica[J]. Br J Haematol, 2000, 108(2): 346-356.
  • 9王增胜,李燕,张晓燕,安利,朱琳,刘虹,王晓敏,秦铁军,肖志坚,白玉盛.骨髓增生异常综合征131例患者细胞遗传学特征及其形态学分析[J].中华内科杂志,2012,51(6):476-477. 被引量:12
  • 10马亮,钟明华,韩呈武,王俊艳,曹永彤,马一盖.骨髓增生异常综合征患者细胞遗传学特征分析[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2012,20(6):1405-1409. 被引量:3

二级参考文献39

  • 1邱镜滢,赖悦云,柴晔,张艳,师岩,何琦,党辉,陆道培.306例骨髓增生异常综合征染色体核型的研究[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2004,12(4):455-459. 被引量:32
  • 2王小钦,林果为.282例原发性骨髓增生异常综合征诊断和分型的前瞻性临床研究[J].中华血液学杂志,2006,27(8):546-549. 被引量:34
  • 3Bernasconi P, Klersy C, Boni M, et al. World Health Organiza- tion classification in combination with eytogenetic markers improves the prognostic stratification of patients with de novo primary myelo- dysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol, 2007,137 : 193-205.
  • 4Valent P, Horny HP , Bennett JM,et al. Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastie syndromes: Consensus statements and report from a working conference. Leuk Res, 2007, 31:727-736.
  • 5Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood, 2002, 100:2292-2302.
  • 6Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau M, ct al. International Scoring System for Evaluating Prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood, 1997, 89:2079-2088.
  • 7Parlier V, van Melle G, Beris P, et al. Hematologic, clinical and cytogenetic analysis in 109 patients with prirnary myelodysplastic syndrome. Prognostic significance of morphology and chromosome findings. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 1994, 78: 219-231.
  • 8Tiu R, Gondek L, O' Keefe C, et al. Clonality of the stem cell compartment during evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes and other bone marrow failure syndromes. Leukemia, 2007, 21 : 1648- 1657.
  • 9Virtaneva K, Writht FA, Tanner SM, et al. Expression profiling reveal fundamental biological differences in acute myeloid leukemia with isolated trosomy 8 and normal cytogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001, 98: 1124-1129.
  • 10Pfeilstocker M, Reisner R, Nosslinger T, et al. Cross-validation of prognostic scores in myelodysplastic syndromes on 386 patients from a single institution confirms importance of cytogenetics. Br J Haematol, 1999, 106: 455-463.

共引文献35

同被引文献142

  • 1杜云志,冯菁华,常春康.二代测序技术在骨髓增生异常综合征临床诊断和治疗决策中的应用进展[J].诊断学理论与实践,2019,0(6):685-691. 被引量:5
  • 2周旭艳,金河,牧启田,盛立霞,赖斌斌,朱慧玲,欧阳桂芳.87例骨髓增生异常综合征患者的14种基因突变分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2019,36(10):953-956. 被引量:3
  • 3马俊丽,曲文闻,胡晓梅.砷制剂在骨髓增生异常综合征治疗中的应用[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(16):4819-4821. 被引量:13
  • 4刘辉,常乃柏,裴蕾,邢宝利,许小东,魏建平,李江涛,顾惜春.骨髓增生异常综合征45例患者的染色体核型研究[J].临床血液学杂志,2007,20(5):265-267. 被引量:3
  • 5Huang DY, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, et al. BRCC3 mutations in mye- loid neoplasms [ J ]. Haematologica,2015,100 ( 8 ) : 1051 - 1057.
  • 6Liyuan M, Siguo H, Colin D, et aL WPSS is a strong prognostic indica- tor for clinical outcome of allogeneic transplant for myelodysplastic syn- drome in Southeast Asian patients[ J]. Ann Hematol,2015,94 (5) :761 - 769.
  • 7Zhou T, Chert P, Gu J, et al. Potential relationship between inadequat~ response to DNA damage and development of myelodysplastic syndrome [ J ]. Int J Mol Sci,2015,16 ( 1 ) :966 - 989.
  • 8Vilenchik MM, Knudson AG Jr. Inverse radiation dose - rate effects on somatic and germ -line mutations and DNA damage rates[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci ,2000,97 (10) :5381 - 5386.
  • 9Novotna B, Bagryantseva Y, Siskova M, et al. Oxidative DNA damage in bone marrow cells of patients with low - risk myelodysplastic syn- drome[J].Leuk Res,2009,33(2) :340 -343.
  • 10Steensma DP, Baer MR, Slack JL, et al. Multicenter study of decit- abine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial[ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 (23) : 3842 - 3848.

引证文献18

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部