期刊文献+

性别差异对肛肠手术罗哌卡因骶管阻滞半数有效浓度的影响 被引量:2

Difference of EC_(50) values of ropivacaine in male and female patients for caudal anesthesia in anorectal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究性别差异对罗哌卡因骶管麻醉应用于肛肠手术半数有效浓度(EC50)的影响。方法:本研究是双盲设计,前瞻性研究,选择ASA I级,择期在骶管麻醉下行肛肠手术患者70例,按性别分为男性组和女性组,每组35例。两组第一例患者罗哌卡因浓度均为0.2%(20mL),相邻浓度之差为0.025%,以对切皮无痛作为有效指标。罗哌卡因给药浓度的增加或减少根据前一个患者的反应决定。应用Dixon法和概率回归分析(Probit)法计算骶管麻醉罗哌卡因EC50。结果:Dixon计算得男性组和女性组罗哌卡因骶管麻醉应用于肛肠手术的EC50分别为0.296%(95%CI:0.286%-0.307%)和0.389%(95%CI:0.372%-0.407%);Probit法计算得EC50值分别0.295%(95%CI:0.173%-0.325%)和0.382%(95%CI:0.352%-0.405%);EC99值分别为0.364%(95%CI:0.330%-1.313%)和0.422%(95%CI:0.400%-0.646%),女性组EC50显著高于男性组(P<0.01)。结论:罗哌卡因骶管麻醉应用于肛肠手术时,女性患者的EC50较男性增加31%,提示应根据性别调整罗哌卡因的浓度实施骶管麻醉。 AIM:To investigate the effect of sex on the median effective concentration(EC50)of ropivacaine for caudal anesthesia. METHODS:In this double-blind,prospective study,we enrolled 70 ASA physical status I patients(35male and 35female)who were scheduled for anorectal surgery under caudal anesthesia,and classified them into two study groups(Group M and Group F)on the basis of their gender difference.Each participant received a single injection of 20 mL ropivacaine through a caudal catheter.Using Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation,the first participant received 0.2% and subsequent concentrations were determined by the analgesic response of the previous patients to the initial skin incision. The concentration change was 0.025%. The up-and-down sequences were analyzed using the Dixon and Probit methods to quantify the caudal analgesic block effective concentrations in 50% of patients. RESULTS:From Dixon method, The EC50 values of ropivacaine for caudal analgesia were 0.296%(95% CI,0.286%-0.307%)in male patients and 0.389%(95% CI,0.372%-0.407%)in female patients.From Probit analysis,the EC50 values ropivacaine in Group M and Group F were 0.295%(95% CI,0.173%-0.325%), 0.382%(95% CI, 0.352%-0.405%)respectively and EC99 was 0.364%(95% CI,0.330%-1.313%),0.422%(95%CI,0.400%-0.646%)respectively.EC50 values of ropivacaine was significantly higher in Group F as compare with Group M(P〈0.01).CONCLUSION:We concluded that the ropivacaine EC50 values for caudal anesthesia in female patients is 31% higher as compare to the male patients.The present findings provide suitable suggestion to anesthesiologists about ropivacaine concentration adjustment for caudal anesthesia based on gender difference.
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2015年第2期188-193,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 浙江省科技厅钱江人才计划(2012R10033) 浙江省卫生厅课题(2014KYB277)
关键词 骶管麻醉 性别 罗哌卡因 序贯法 caudal anesthesia sex differences ropivacaine sequential allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Shin S, Kim JY, Kim WO, et al. Ultrasound visi- bility of spinal structures and local anesthetic spread in children undergoing caudal block [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014,40(11) :2630-2636.
  • 2Najman IE, Frederieo TN, Segurado AV, et al. Caudal epidural anesthesia: an anesthetic technique exclusive for pediatric use? Is it possible to use it in adults? What is the role of the ultrasound in this context [J]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2011,61 (1) : 95- 109.
  • 3杨小平.100例骶管麻醉应用于肛肠科手术的临床分析[J].当代医学,2013,19(32):60-61. 被引量:6
  • 4Hussain AM, Khan FA, Ahmed A, et al. Effect of gender on pain perception and analgesic consumption in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An observational study [J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2013,29 (3) : 337-341.
  • 5Ward DS, Norton RJ, Guivarch PH, et al. Phar- maeodynamics and pharmacokineties of propofol in a medium-chain triglyceride emulsion [J]. Anesthesi- ology, 2002, 97(6):1401-1408.
  • 6Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method [J]. Neurosei Biobehav Rev, 1991,15(1): 47-50.
  • 7Li Y, Zhu S, Bao F, et al. The effects of age on the median effective concentration of ropivacaine for motor blockade after epidural anesthesia with ropiv- acaine [J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102 (6): 1847- 1850.
  • 8Dalens B. Pediatric Local and Regional Anesthesia [M]. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996:55-65.
  • 9Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salt of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia [J]. Acta Anaestbesiol Stand, 1965,16(suppl) :55-69.
  • 10Lacassie H J, Columb MO, Lacassie HP, et ah The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupiva- caine and ropivacaine in labor[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (1) : 204-208.

二级参考文献26

  • 1黄微,孙晓雄,许幸.脊柱手术患者靶控输注与间断静注维库溴铵药效学的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(7):553-554. 被引量:19
  • 2Singh M, Chauhan C, Rath GP, et al. Effect of narcotic pretreatment on pain after rocuronium in- jection: a randomized, double-blind controlled com- parison with lidocaine[J].J Anesth, 2007, 21(4): 510-512.
  • 3Borgeat A, Kwiatowski D. Spontaneous movements associated with rocuronium: is pain on injection the cause[J].? BrJ Anaesth, 1997, -79(3) 382-383.
  • 4Memis D, Turan A, Karamanliogy B, et aI. The prevention of pain from injection of rocuronium by ondansetron, lidocaine, tramadol and fentanyl[J].Anesth Analg, 2002, 94(6) 1517-1520.
  • 5Back SH, Woo CM, Lee HJ, et al. Rocuronium-in- duced withdrawal movements associated with dif- ferent Rocuronium injection method [J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2008,18(6) :515-519.
  • 6Tuncali B, Karci A, Tuncali BE, et al. Dilution of rocuronium to 0. 5mg/ml with 0. 9% NaCL eliminates the pain during intravenous injection in awake patiens[J]. Anesth Analg,2004,99(3) :740-743.
  • 7Kim JY, Kwak HJ, Park KS, et al. Prevention of rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement in children: a comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil [J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2008,18 ( 3 ) : 245 - 250.
  • 8Ahmad N, Choy CY, Aris EA, et al. Preventing the withdrawal response associated with rocuronium injection: a comparison of fentanyl with lidocaine [J]. Anesth Analg, 2005,100(4) :987-990.
  • 9Yoon JY, Kim HK, Kwon JY, et al. ECs0 of remifentanil to prevent withdrawal movement asso- ciated with injection oi rocuronium[J]. J Anesth, 2010, 24(2) :182-186.
  • 10Kim KS, Kim YS, Jeon WJ, et al. Prevention of withdrawal associated with the injection of rocuroni- um in adults and children[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2006, 18(5) :334-338.

共引文献12

同被引文献31

  • 1DOBEREINER EF, COX RG, EWEN A, et O1. Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2010, 57(12): 1102-1110.
  • 2KIM EM, KIM MS, HAN SJ, et ol. Magnesium as an adjuvant for caudal analgesia in children[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2014, 24 (12): 1231-1238.
  • 3JOHR M. Regional anaesthesia in neonates, infants and children: an educational review[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2015, 32(5) : 289- 297.
  • 4CHO JE, KIM JY, PARK SJ, et ol. The effect of 1 trg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with high- volume/low- concentration caudal ropivacaine in children undergoing ambulatory orchiopexy [J]. Biol Pharm Bull, 2015, 38(7): 1020-1025.
  • 5BHARTI N, PRAVEEN R, BALA I. A dose-response study of caudal dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in pediatric day care patients undergoing lower abdominal and perineal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2014, 24 (11 ) : 1158-1163.
  • 6DIXON WJ. Staircase biossay :the up-and-down method[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1991, 15 (1): 47-50.
  • 7ANAND VG, KANNAN M, THAVAMANI A, et ol. Effects of dexmedetomidine added to caudal ropivacaine in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2011, 55(4): 340-346.
  • 8DAS B, LAKSHMEGOWDA M, SHARMA M, et al. Supraelavi- cular brachial plexus block using ropivacaine alone or combined with dexmedetomidine for upper limb surgery: A prospective, rando-mized, double-blinded, comparative study[J]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2015, 16(15) : 120-126.
  • 9BOSENBERG A, THOMAS J, LOPEZ T, et ol. The efficacy of caudal ropivacaine 1, 2 and 3 mg-mL- for postoperative analgesia in children[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2002, 12(1 ) : 53-58.
  • 10TRAN DQ, DUGANI S, DYACHENKO A, et al. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound- guided infraclavi- cular block[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2011, 36(2) : 190-194.

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部