期刊文献+

T_1期肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术切缘安全范围的探讨 被引量:10

Exploration of optimal surgical margin in nephron-sparing surgery for T_1 renal tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨T1期肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术切缘的安全范围。方法回顾性分析我院泌尿外科行保留肾单位手术的172例对侧肾脏正常的T1期肾肿瘤患者资料。分析切缘大小、围手术期并发症、术中冷冻切片病理、术后石蜡切片病理及肿瘤复发之间的关系。另取同期T1期根治性肾切除标本35例,于体外沿假包膜行肾肿瘤剜除术,取残肾距离切缘2、5和10mm处肾实质送石蜡切片病理检查。结果 172例中,切缘〈2mm组13例,2-5mm组87例,〉5mm组72例。〈2mm组9例行切缘冷冻切片病理检查,1例阳性;2-5mm组38例行切缘冷冻切片病理检查,1例阳性。切缘阳性的2例肿瘤行根治性肾切除术,术后将2例残余肾行石蜡切片病理检查,均未见肿瘤残余。另外,术中行冷冻切片阴性或未行冷冻切片检查,〈2mm组和2-5mm组术后石蜡切片病理检查各有1例切缘阳性,其中,〈2mm组的病例3年后原位复发,行根治性肾切除术;2-5mm组阳性病例密切随访5年,未发现肿瘤复发。172例保留肾单位手术中10例围手术期有并发症发生,其中,2-5mm组3例(3.4%),〉5mm组7例(9.7%)。平均随访33个月,术后石蜡切片病理切缘阴性的病例中,〈2mm组1例出现影像学可疑复发,穿刺活检阴性,其他两组均无复发。根治性肾切除术后的35例肿瘤剜除后残肾标本中,2例距离切缘2mm处存在肿瘤浸润。结论 T1期肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术切缘控制在2-5mm较为安全合适。若肿瘤包膜完整,没有必要行术中冷冻切片病理检查。 Objective To discusse optimal surgical margin in nephron-sparing surgery for T1 renal tumor. Methods Retrospective analysis of 172 T1 renal tumors with nephron-sparing surgery. Margin size, perioperative complications, recurrence, pathology and frozen paraffin pathological findings were recorded and comparatively analyzed. We also selected radical nephrectomy specimens of 32 patients (T1), performed surgical enucleation and carefully investigated the surgical margin of 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm and the renal pathology. Results There are 13 cases in ~2 mm group, 87 cases in 2-5 mm group, 72 cases in 〉5 mm group. There is one positive margin of 9 cases sent to frozen pathology in 〉2 mm group, while one positive margin of 38 cases in 2-5 ram. After radical nephrectomy, residual renal pathology in paraffin showed no residual tumor. There are 2 cases of tumor invasion margin exists of postoperative pathological paraffin, 1 patient recurrence 3 years later in 〈:2 mm group, 1 patient had no recurrence in 2-5 mm group. There are 3 cases in 2-5 mm group (3.4~/6o), while 7 cases in ~5 mm group (9.7~~) of the 10 cases of complications. There is 1 patient in 〉2 mm group with suspicious radiographic recurrence while biopsy was negative and the other two groups had no recurrence in the negative margin cases. There are 2 tumor invasion in the surgical margin of 2 mm in 35 renal cancer specimens. Conclusions These results indicate that surgical margin of 2-5 mm for nephron-sparing surgery may be quite safe. There is no need for intraoperative frozen pathology if the tumor capsule is intact.
出处 《现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志》 2015年第1期13-16,共4页 Journal of Contemporary Urologic and Reproductive Oncology
关键词 肾肿瘤 保留肾单位手术 切缘 病理 Kidney neoplasms Nephron sparing surgery Surgical margin Pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Huang WC,Elkin EB,Levey AS,et al. Partial nephrectomyversus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renaltumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascularoutcomes? [J], J Urol,2009,181(1) :55-62.
  • 2赵朋,白铁男,孙光.小肾癌保留肾单位手术与肾癌根治性切除术的临床疗效比较[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志,2013,5(1):4-7. 被引量:7
  • 3Ljungberg B,Cowan NC,Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guide-lines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update[J]. Eur Urol,2010,58(3):398-406.
  • 4Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Macleannan GT,et al. Does thesize of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cellcarcinoma really matter? [J]. J Urol,2002,167(1) :61-64.
  • 5李泉林,关宏伟,秦杰,姜涛,宋希双.早期肾癌保肾手术切缘大小对患者远期疗效的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2012,33(7):489-491. 被引量:12
  • 6Van Poppel H, Joniau S. How important are surgical mar-gins in nephron-sparing surgery? [J]. Eur Urol Suppl,2007,6(8):533-539.
  • 7Akcetin Z,Zugor V,Elsasser D,et al. Does the distance tonormal renal parenchyma (DTNRP) in nephron-sparing sur-gery for renal cell carcinoma have an effect on survival? [J].Anticancer Res,2005,25(3A) : 1629-1632.
  • 8Chen XS,Zhang ZT,Du J,et al. Optimal surgical margin innephron-sparing surgery for Tib renal cell carcinoma[J]. U-rology,2012,79(4):836-839.
  • 9姜元军,宫大鑫,杨春明,毕建斌,孔垂泽,孙志熙.不同切缘厚度的保留肾单位手术对小肾癌的疗效对比分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2012,20(6):1215-1217. 被引量:10
  • 10McHaleT,Malkowicz SB? Tomaszewski JE,et al. Potentialpitfalls in the frozen section evaluation of parenchymal mar-gins in nephron-sparing surgery[J], Am J Clin Pathol,2002,118(6):903-910.

二级参考文献15

  • 1王文成,马腾骧.312例肾癌诊治现状:肾癌的早期诊断[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1989,10(4):209-212. 被引量:15
  • 2Cestari A, Naspro R, Guazzoni G. How should small renal masses be treated today[J] ? Eur Urol, 2008, 53(6) : 1115 - 1116.
  • 3Kirkali Z, Canda AE. Open partial nephrectomy in the manage- ment of small renal masses[ J]. Adv Urol,2008 ,309 :760.
  • 4Volpe A, Cadeddu JA, Cestari A, et al. Contemporary Manage- ment of Small Renal Masses[J]. Eur Urol,2011,05 :44.
  • 5Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL. The natural history of ob- served enhancing renal masses: meta - analysis and review of the world literature[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(2) : 425 -431.
  • 6Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Dunn RL, et al. Surgical manage- ment of low -stage renal cell carcinoma: Technology does not su- persede biology[ J]. Urology, 2006, 67(6) : 1175 -1180.
  • 7Lee VT, Yip SK, Tan PH, et al. Renal cell carcinoma of 4 cm or less : an appraisal of its clinical presentation and contemporary sur- gical management[J]. Asian J Surg, 2006, 29(1 ): 40-43.
  • 8Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et at. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy : analysis of the current literature [ J ]. Eur Urol,2008, 53(4): 732-743.
  • 9Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA, et al. Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron - sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma[ J ]. Urology, 2002, 60 (6) : 993 - 997.
  • 10Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of pT1 a renal cell carcinoma: our 20 - year experi- ence[J]. Eur Urol,2006, 50(6) : 1263 -1271.

共引文献25

同被引文献80

  • 1马鑫,刘新,郑涛,史涛坪,瓦斯里江.瓦哈甫,俞鸿凯,宋鹏,张旭.肾动脉低温灌注联合腹腔镜肾部分切除术处理复杂肾肿瘤的初步经验[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(2):80-83. 被引量:17
  • 2张大宏,孙文超.保留肾单位的腹腔镜肾肿瘤切除手术方法及技巧[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(5):332-334. 被引量:29
  • 3Pietzak EJ, Guzzo TJ. Advancements in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: expanding the feasibility of nephron-sparlng [J]. AdvUrol,2012:148952. doi 10. 1155/2012/148952.
  • 4Kim SP, Murad MH, Thompson RH, et aL Comparative Ef- fectiveness for Survival and Renal Function of Partial and Radical Nephreetomy for Localized Renal Tumors: A Sys- tematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Urol,2012. doi: 10. 1016/j.juro.2012.10.026.
  • 5Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical ne- phreetomy for pTla renal masses may be associated with de- creased overall survival compared with partial nephreetomy [J]. J Urol,2008,179(2):468-473.
  • 6Li HK, Chung HJ, Huang EY, et al. Impact of warm ische- mia time on the change of split renal function after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in Taiwan Residents patients[J]. J Chin Med Assoc,2015,78(1) : 62-66.
  • 7D'Urso L, Simone G, Rosso R, et al. Benefits and short- comings of superselective transarterial embolization of renal tumors before zero ischemia laparoscopie partial nephrectomy [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2014,40(12) :1731-1737.
  • 8Becket F, Van Poppcl H, Hakenberg OW, et aL Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Uroi,2009,56(4) :625 -634.
  • 9Lane BR, Gill IS, Fergany AF, et al. Limited warm ischemiaduring elective partial nephrectomy has only a marginal im- pact on renal functional outcomes[J]. J Urol,2011,185 (5): 1598-1603.
  • 10Godoy G, Ramanathan V, Kanofsky JA, et al. Effect of warm is- chemia time during laparoscopie partial nephrectomy on early postoperative glomerular filtration rate[J]. J Urol, 2009,181 (6) : 2438-2443.

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部