期刊文献+

罪恶感诉求与产品类型对善因营销的影响 被引量:1

The Effects of Guilt Appeals and Product Types on Cause-Related Marketing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以企业积极开展善因营销活动、承担社会责任的营销行为为研究对象,通过设计不同实验组对罪恶感诉求及产品类型对善因营销效果影响机理进行实证检验。研究发现强调罪恶感诉求的营销效果更为显著,而且罪恶感诉求与产品类型具有显著交互作用;在善因营销活动中推广不同类型的产品,需匹配适宜的罪恶感诉求方式;当产品类型为实用型时,强调罪恶感诉求方式能收获更好的营销效果;当产品类型为享乐型时,不强调罪恶感诉求的营销方式更佳。 Focusing on cause- related marketing activities and marketing behavior of social responsibility,the paper empirically tests the effect mechanism of guilt appeals and product types on cause- related marketing by conducting different experimental groups. The result indicates that a guilt appeal ad will be more effective,and there is an interaction between guilt appeals and product type; promoting different types of product should take guilt appeals into account in CRM activities. A guilt appeal ad will be the most effective when applied to a practical product; while a non- guilt appeal ad will be the most effective for a hedonic product.
作者 白琳 陈绘雯
机构地区 安徽大学商学院
出处 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期128-133,共6页 Commercial Research
基金 教育部社科研究基金青年项目"中国消费者自我赠礼动机及行为研究" 项目编号:11YJC630002 安徽大学青年科学研究基金项目"我国消费者民族中心主义市场细分研究" 项目编号:SKQN1001 安徽大学研究生学术创新研究项目"罪恶感诉求对善因营销广告效果影响研究" 项目编号:yfc100278
关键词 罪恶感诉求 消费罪恶感 善因营销 产品属性 购买意愿 guilt appeals consumer guilty cause-related marketing product attribute purchase intention
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Burnett M S and Lunsford D A. Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision - making process [ J ]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1994, 11 (3) : 33 - 43.
  • 2Xu J, Schwarz N. Do we really need a reason to in- dulge? [ J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46 (1) : 25 -36.
  • 3Chang C T. Guilt appeal in Cause -related marketing: The subversive role of product type and donation magni- tude [ J ]. International Journal of Advertising, 2011 , 30 (4) :587 -616.
  • 4Coulter, R.H. & Pinto, M.B. Guilt appeals in adver- tising: what are their effects? [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995,80 (6) : 697 - 705.
  • 5Cotte, J. , Coulter, R. & Moore, M. Enhancing or disrupting guilt: the role of credibility and perceived manipulative intent [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 2005,58 (3) :361 - 368.
  • 6Dhar, R. & Wertenbroch, K. Consumer choice be- tween hedonic and utilitarian goods[ J]. Journal of Mar- keting Research,2000, 37( 1 ) :60 -71.
  • 7Okada, E.M. Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods [ J ]. Journal of Market- ing Research,2005, 42( 1): 43-53.
  • 8Strahilevitz, M. & Myers, J.G. Donations to charity as purchase incentives:how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell[ J]. Journal of Consumer Re- search, 1998, 24 ( 3 ) :434 - 446.
  • 9Renaud L, Ababacar M. When atmospherics lead to in- ferences of manipulative intent: its effects on trust and attitude[ J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66 (7) :823 -830.
  • 10Landreth- Grau S L, Folse J A. Cause -related mar- keting(CRM) -the influence of donation proximity and message - framing cues on the less - involved consumer [J]. Journal of Advertising,2007, 36(4):19 -33.

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部