期刊文献+

一种改进的全球对流层天顶延迟模型 被引量:23

An Improved Global Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 顾及文献[16]所建立的全球对流层天顶延迟模型GZTD的时间分辨率为24h,为进一步提高GZTD模型的时间分辨率,利用GGOS atmosphere的2002—2009年全球天顶对流层延迟格网时间序列按照其6h的时间分辨率分别建模,再采用三次样条插值计算任意时刻的天顶对流层延迟估值,由此构建了一种时间分辨率更高(6h)的改进的GZTD模型(GZTD-6h)。经过两种模型内符合检验对比分析表明,GZTD-6h模型内符合精度(bias:0.17cm,RMS:3.9cm)优于GZTD(bias:0.17cm,RMS:4.4cm)。使用全球IGS站进行外符合检验,统计结果表明GZTD-6h模型(bias:-0.22cm,RMS:4.05cm)相比GZTD(bias:-0.45cm,RMS:4.51cm)改善明显。 The time resolution of GZTD model developed by Yao[16] is 24 hours .To further improve the time resolution of GZTD model ,we used the time series of global 4D‐grid ZTD from 2002 to 2009 ,provided by GGOS atmosphere ,to construct model according to the 6 hours resolution ,and then calculated the ZTD at any time using the cubic spline interpolation method .Thus we developed an improved higher time resolution (6 h) GZTD model (GZTD‐6h) .Analyzing the inner coincidence of two models comparatively ,we found that GZTD‐6h model (bi as:0 1.7 cm ,RMS:3 9. cm) performs better than GZTD model (bi as:0 1.7 cm ,RMS:4 4. cm) .Using ZTD time series from global International GNSS Service (IGS) sites to analyze outer coincidence ,the statistical results shows that GZTD‐6h model (bi as:-0 2.2 cm ,RMS:4 0.5 cm) improves significantly ,compared with GZTD model (bi as:-0 4.5 cm ,RMS:4 5.1 cm) .
出处 《测绘学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期242-249,共8页 Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(41174012 41274022) 国家863计划(2013AA122502) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-12-0428) 高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2014214020202) 国家测绘地理信息局测绘基础研究基金(13-02-09)~~
关键词 天顶对流层延迟 GZTD模型 时间分辨率 GZTDG6h模型 zenith tropospheric delay GZTD model time resolution GZTD-6hmodel
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1严豪健.对流层大气折射延迟改正(Ⅰ):经典理论[J].天文学进展,1995,13(4):380-391. 被引量:13
  • 2陈小明,刘基余.GPS动态定位的对流层改正模型[J].导航,1996,32(2):44-46. 被引量:2
  • 3殷海涛,黄丁发,熊永良,王贵文.GPS信号对流层延迟改正新模型研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(5):454-457. 被引量:43
  • 4黄捷.无线电测速定位的对流层电波传播误差[J].电波与天线,1973,(3):10-28.
  • 5Collins J P, Langley R B. A tropospheric delay model for the user of the Wide Area Augmentation System. In: Final Contract Report for Nav Canada, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 187, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N B, Canada. 1997.
  • 6Collins J P, Langley R B. The Residual Tropospheric Propagation Delay: How Bad Can It Get? In: ION GPS 1998, September 15-18, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 1998. 729-738.
  • 7RTCA/DO-229C. Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. SC-169, RTCA, Inc., Washington DC, 2001.
  • 8Dodson A H, Chen W, Baker H C, et al. Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model. In: ION GPS 1999, September 14-17, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 1999. 1401-1407.
  • 9Penna, N, Dodson A, Chen W. Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model. J Navig, 2001, 54: 37-55.
  • 10Uemo M, Hoshinoo K, Matsunaga K, et al. Assessment of atmospheric delay correction models for the Japanese MSAS. In: ION GPS2001, September 11-14, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2001. 2341-2350.

共引文献177

同被引文献116

引证文献23

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部