期刊文献+

腹腔镜技术对结直肠癌淋巴结微转移的影响 被引量:5

Effect of Laparoscopic Technique on Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜技术对结直肠癌淋巴结微转移的影响。方法将40例结直肠癌患者分为腔镜组与开腹组,采用免疫组织化学染色法检测阴性淋巴结中CEA、CK20的表达情况,比较分析2组表达差异性。结果腹腔镜组常规病理阴性淋巴结115枚,其中CEA阳性17枚(14.8%),CK20阳性10枚(11.5%);开腹组109枚,其中CEA阳性14枚(12.8%),CK20阳性13枚(11.9%),2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论结直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开腹手术比较并不增加癌细胞区域淋巴结的微转移。 ABSTRACT:Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic technique on lymph node micro-metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.Methods A total of 40 patients with colorectal canc-er were randomly assigned into laparotomy group and laparoscopic surgery group.The expression of CEA and CK20 in negative lymph nodes was detected using immunohistochemical staining,and was compared between the both groups.Results There were 115 negative lymph nodes in laparo-scopic surgery group.Among them,positive CEA expression was found in 17 (14.8%)and posi-tive CK20 expression in 10 (11.5%).There were 109 negative lymph nodes in laparotomy group. Among them,positive CEA expression was found in 14 (12.8%)and positive CK20 expression in 13 (11.9%).No significant differences in the expression of CEA and CK20 were found between the two groups (P >0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery does not increase the lymph node micrometastasis compared with laparotomy.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2015年第3期36-37,69,共3页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 结直肠癌 微转移 免疫组化 laparoscope colorectal cancer micrometastases immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Aikaterini Tsouma,Chrysanthi Aggeli,Panagiotis Lembessis,George N Zografos,Dimitris P Korkolis,Dimitrios Pectasides,Maria Skondra,Nikolaos Pissimissis,Anastasia Tzonou,Michael Koutsilieris.Multiplex RT-PCR-based detections of CEA, CK20 and EGFR in colorectal cancer patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(47):5965-5974. 被引量:19
  • 2季加孚,武爱文.进展期胃癌新辅助化疗的研究进展[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(4):394-395. 被引量:58
  • 3Wang CS,Chao TC,Jan YY,et al.Benefits of palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer.Chang Gung Med J,2002,25 (12):792-802.
  • 4Washington K.7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual:stomach.Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(12):3077-3079.
  • 5Takahashi Y,Takeuchi T,Sakamoto J,et al.The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients:a prospective clinical study.Gastric Cancer,2003,6(3):142-145.
  • 6Cidón EU,Bustamante R.Gastric cancer:tumor markers as predictive factors for preoperative staging.J Gastrointest Cancer,2010,42(3):127- 130.
  • 7Hwang GI, Yoo CH, Sohn BH, et al.Predictive value of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma.Cancer Res Treat,2004,36(3):178-181.
  • 8Mattar R,Alves DAC,Difavero GM,et al.Preoperative serum levels of CA72 -4, CEA, CA19-9, and alpha- fetoprotein in patients with gastric cancer.Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo,2002,57 (3):89-92.
  • 9Ychou M,Duffour J,Kramar A,et al.Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.Dis Markers,2000,16(3 -4):105-110.
  • 10Tocchi A,Costa G,Lepre L,et al.The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen,CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,1998,124(8):450-455.

共引文献134

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部