期刊文献+

论风险工程观

On View of Risk Engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统工程观更多地关注"造物"的目标,却忽略了"造物"的过程,对工程主体也持不闻不问的态度,这种结果是由"投资——收益"思维模式和工具理性的思想观念导致的。在风险社会理论的启示下,风险工程观思想的提出,表明现代工程风险研究要超越单纯以经济利益为标准的传统模式,加强对工程过程中"人"的价值的关注,并对技术在工程中的应用持谨慎态度。 The traditional view of engineering pays more attention on the goal of 'creation', and the process of the'creation'has always been ignored. It also holds the indifferent attitude for the subject of engineering, and this result is caused by the 'investment-income'mode of thinking and ideas of instrumental rationality. In line with the revelation of risk society theory, this paper proposes the thought of risk engineering, indicating the study that modern engineering should transcend the conventional model, which more considers the factor of economics, to strengthen the value of 'human'in engineering process of concern, and hold cautious attitude for technology applications in project process.
作者 蒙宏伟
出处 《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期7-11,共5页 Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 造物 工程风险 工具理性 creation engineering risks instrumental rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1斯科特·拉什,王武龙.风险社会与风险文化[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(4):52-63. 被引量:319
  • 2Sabine Roeser and Lotte Asveld, "The Ethics of Technological Risk : Introduction and Overview", In Lotte Asveld and Sabine Roeser, ed. , Ethics of Technological Risk, London, Earthscan, 2009, p. 18.
  • 3Douglas MacLean," Ethics, Reasons and Risk Analysis", In Lotte Asveld and Sabine Roeser, ed. , Ethics of Technological Risk, London, Earthscan, 2009, pp. 115 - 127.
  • 4Harry Otway, "Experts, Risk Communication, and Democracy", Risk Analysis, Vol. 7,1987, pp. 125 - 129.
  • 5R. D. Hollander and N. H. Steneck, "Science-and Engineering-Related Ethics and Values Studies : Characteristics of an Emerging Field of Research", Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 15, Issue 1,1990, pp. 84 - 104.
  • 6Kristin Shrader-Frechette," The Real Risk of Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis", In Paul T. Durbin, ed. , Technology and Responsibility, Boston, MA : D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987, pp. 343 - 357.
  • 7Paul T. Durbin ,Activist Philosophy of Technology Essays: 1999 -2009 (Vol. 1 ), http://www, udel. edu/Philosophy/sites/ pd/files/activistl, doc.
  • 8[美]查尔斯·E.哈里斯等.《工程伦理:概念和案例》,丛杭青等译,北京理工大学出版社,2006,第126-127页;第134-136页.
  • 9Diane Vaughan, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA, Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press, 1997.
  • 10Rosa Lynn Pinkus et al. , Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost,Schedule, and Risk-Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle, Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press, 1997.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部