期刊文献+

石化园区规划大气环境风险模拟方法与案例 被引量:4

Modeling regional atmospheric risks of petrochemical park planning
原文传递
导出
摘要 为定量评估石化园区规划中的区域尺度大气环境风险水平,该文从源头预防高风险产业集聚导致的布局矛盾,综合运用风险识别技术、CALPUFF大气扩散模型、空间分析方法,构建了石化园区规划层面大气环境风险模拟方法。以某石化园区规划为例,对涉及丙烯腈、氯气、光气、硫化氢、氨气的6个重大危险源的大气风险开展了不同季节下的事故扩散模拟。结果表明:1 141.5km2(占评价区域98.7%)范围内大气环境风险水平不同程度提高,其中事故后可能对人体造成不可恢复影响的范围达到326.5km2(28.2%);秋季气象条件最不利于事故扩散,区域风险水平高于其他季节;二苯基甲烷二异氰酸酯(MDI)项目对区域大气风险水平变化的贡献超过90%。 An integrated method combining risk analysis, CALPUFF dispersion model, and spatial analyses, were used to assess the regional atmospheric risk caused by major risk sources in petrochemical park plans. A typical petrochemical park in the planning stage was selected as the case study. The risks of six major sources, involving chlorine, phosgene, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and acrylonitrile, were simulated in different seasons. The results show that the atmospheric risk is increased in 98.7% of the region 1141.5 km2. In 28.2% of the area, i.e. 326.5 km2, human health may be adversely affected after some accidents. The meteorological conditions in the fall are not conducive to pollution dispersion. The highest risks come from the diphenyl methane diisocyanate produeing(MDI) project that contributes more than 90% of the increment in the regional atmospheric risk.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期80-86,共7页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 中国环境保护部环保公益性行业科研专项经费资助项目(201209043)
关键词 规划环境风险评价 区域风险 CALPUFF大气扩散模型 石化园区 事故风险 planning environmental risk assessment regional risk CALPUFF dispersion model petrochemical park accidental risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献124

共引文献241

同被引文献39

  • 1HJ/T169-2004.建设项目环境风险评价技术导则[S].[S].,..
  • 2刘桂友,徐琳瑜.一种区域环境风险评价方法——信息扩散法[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(9):1549-1556. 被引量:34
  • 3赵克勤.集对分析及初步应用[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2000.
  • 4Zhou Y F, Liu M. Risk Assessment of Major Hazards and its Application in Urban Planning: A Case Study [J]. Risk Analysis, 2012,32(3): 566-577.
  • 5Giubilato E, Zabeo A, Critto A, et al. A risk-based methodology for ranking environmental chemical stressors at the regional scale [J]. Environment International, 2014,65:41-53.
  • 6Pizzol L, Critto A, Agostini P, et al. Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites Part 2: Ranking of potentially contaminated sites [J]. Environment International, 2011,37(8):1307-1320.
  • 7Roy P K, Bhatt A, Rajagopal C. Quantitative risk assessment for accidental release of titanium tetrachloride in a titanium sponge production plant [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 102(2/3): 167-186.
  • 8Bubbieo R, Mazzarotta B. Accidental release of toxic chemicals: Influence of the main input parameters on consequence calculation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003,151(2/3): 394-406.
  • 9Buckle R L, Hunter C H, Werth D W, et al. A ease study of chlorine transport and fate following a large accidental release [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012,62:184-198.
  • 10Xu L, Liu t2 The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(11):3290-3296.

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部