期刊文献+

用西格玛性能验证图评价中国血糖检测项目 被引量:27

Application of sigma performance verification for blood glucose test in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨用西格玛性能验证图评价全国血糖检测项目。方法将参加实验室的室内质控在控变异系数作为不精密度的估计值,用实验室正确度验证计划中检测结果的平均值与参考方法得到的靶值之间的百分差值作为实验室检测的偏倚估计值,用国家标准GB/T 20470-2006和卫生行业标准WS/T 403-2012中血糖项目的允许总误差(10%、7%)作为质量规范,计算所有参加实验室的西格玛(σ)值,并绘制西格玛性能验证图。结果当使用国家标准作为允许总误差时,σ值的中位数(四分位数间距)为4.92(3.93);西格玛性能验证图中位于左下区域也就是σ≥6(世界一流水平)的实验室数量较多,为52家(38.2%),检测性能可接受(σ≥3)的实验室数量为109家(80.1%)。当用卫生行业标准作为允许总误差时,σ值的中位数(四分位数间距)为3.04(2.89),西格玛性能验证图中位于右上区域也就是σ<2(不可接受)的实验室数量较多,为44家(32.4%),检测性能可接受(σ≥3)的实验室数量为70家(51.5%)。结论西格玛性能验证图可直观地展示多个实验室的检测性能水平。 Objective To evaluate blood glucose test in China by using sigma performance verification. Methods The coefficient of variability in internal quality control of participant laboratories was regarded as the estimated value of imprecision. The percentage difference between mean in accuracy verification scheme and target value of refernce method was used as the estimated bias. The total allowable errors of blood glucose test in national standard GB / T 20470-2006( 10%) and health professional standard WS / T 403-2012( 7%) were adopted as the quality specification when the sigma( σ) values of all participants were calculated. Sigma performance verification diagrams were plotted using professional software. Results When the national standard was used as the total allowable error,the median( interquartile range) of σ value was 4. 92( 3. 93). In 52 laboratories( 38. 25%) the medium located in the left bottom area of sigma performance verification diagram indicating σ value greater than or equal to 6( world class level),and the amount of laboratories with acceptable performance( σ≥3) was 109( 80. 1%). When the health professional standard was used as the total allowable error,the median( interquartile range) of σ value was 3. 04( 2. 89). In 44 laboratories( 32. 4%) the medium located in the right top area of sigma performance verification diagram indicating σ 〈2( unacceptable),while the amount of laboratories with acceptable performance( σ≥3) was 70( 51. 5%). Conclusion Sigma performance verification may intuitively show the level of test performance in multiple laboratories.
机构地区 北京医院
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第3期223-225,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基金 北京市自然科学基金(7143182)
关键词 西格玛 西格玛性能验证图 血糖 变异系数 偏倚 sigma sigma performance verification blood glucose coefficient of variability bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1王治国.1艋床检验质量控制技术[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:554-567.
  • 2Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory per- formance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000, 124(4) : 516-519.
  • 3GB/T20470~006.临床实验室室问质量评价要求[s].中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,2006.
  • 4WS/T403-2012.临床生物化学检验指标分析质量指标[s].中华人民共和国卫生部,2012.
  • 5Kinns H, Pitkin S, Housley D, et al. Internal quality control: best practice[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2013, 66(12) : 1027-1032.
  • 6Schoenmakers CH, Naus AJ, Vermeer HJ, et al. Practical applica- tion of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry [ J ]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 49( 11 ) :1837-1843.
  • 7康凤凤,王薇,何法霖,王治国.已通过ISO 15189认可的临床实验室常规生化指标的性能评价[J].临床检验杂志,2013,31(1):57-59. 被引量:15
  • 8康凤凤,张传宝,王薇,王治国.正确度验证计划在六西格玛性能评价中的应用[J].临床检验杂志,2014,32(2):130-132. 被引量:18

二级参考文献15

  • 1Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory perform- ance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [ J 1. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000, 124(4) : 516-519.
  • 2WS/T403-2012.临床生物化学检验指标分析质量指标[s].中华人民共和国卫生部,2012.
  • 3GB/T20470-2006.临床实验室室间质量评价要求[s].中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,2006.
  • 4Schoenmakers CH, Naus A J, Vermeer H J, et al. Practical applica- tion of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry [ J ]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 49 ( 11 ) : 1837-1843.
  • 5Boonen K J, Curvers J, Timmerman AA, et al. Trueness in the meas- urement of haemoglobin: consensus or reference method? [ J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 50(3) : 511-514.
  • 6Fraser CG,,Hyltoft PP.Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications[].Clinical Chemistry.1999
  • 7Ricos C,Alvarez V,Cava F,et al.Current databases on biologic variation:pros,cons and progress[].Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.1999
  • 8Minchinela J,Ricós C,Perich C.Biological variation database,and quality specifications for imprecision bias and total error (desirable and minimum).The2012update. http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase-2012-update.htm . 2012
  • 9Fraser CG.General strategies to set quality specifications for reliabili-ty performance characteristics[].Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.1999
  • 10.Medical laboratories-Particular requirements for quality and competence[].ISO.2007

共引文献31

同被引文献131

引证文献27

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部