摘要
刑事诉讼法修改后,刑事和解制度的实施现状与预期有较大落差,其直接原因是立法失误及推动和解动力源的变化,深层原因则是对某些刑事和解理论的误读。重新解释刑事和解的本质及经济赔偿的本意,对刑事和解价值目标进行合理分流,确立公安司法机关之外的有权威的和解主持者,正确认识经济赔偿的差异性并确立赔偿的指导基准,建立补充性的国家代偿机制等将有助于刑事和解走出实践困局。
There is a large gap between the current situation and the expectation of the legal community before the amending of Criminal Procedure Law, directly because of legislative misjudgment and the change of the motivation of reconciliation. But the deeper cause is some theoretical misunderstandings of criminal reconciliation. This paper proposes some practical measures to lead criminal reconciliation out of the dilemmaReinterpreting the nature of criminal reconciliation and monetary damage, reasonably splitting the values of criminal reconciliation, ensuring there are authoritative speakers besides the public security and judicial organs, correctly understanding the difference of monetary damages, establishing the guiding standards of monetary compensation, and establishing complementary national compensation system, and so on.
出处
《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期151-160,共10页
Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
2013年司法部一般项目"指导性案例制度研究--基于J省实践的实证研究"(13SFB2021)
关键词
刑事和解
刑事诉讼法修改
被害人保护
criminal reconciliation
the Admending of Criminal Procedure Law
victim protection