期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙入路Hybrid技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床分析 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎旁肌间隙入路行融合与非融合结合技术(hybrid技术)治疗多节段腰椎退行性变的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年4月~2013年3月42例腰椎退行性变的患者,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)进行评定,影像学测量手术节段及邻近节段活动度(ROM)、保护节段及邻近节段退变(ASDeg)发生率。结果 42例病人均获随访,随访时间12~36月,平均19.8月。术后及末次随访时VAS平分和ODI评定与术前比较明显改善(P〈0.001),术后1月与末次随访无明显差异(P〉0.05)。术后腰椎总活动度和非融合节段活动度较术前明显减低(P〈0.05),邻近节段略增加但无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论经椎旁肌间隙入路行hybrid技术是治疗腰椎退行性病变的一种创伤小、安全、有效的组合动态固定方法,可防止手术邻近节段的退变。
作者 张健 王文军
出处 《中南医学科学杂志》 CAS 2015年第2期160-164,共5页 Medical Science Journal of Central South China
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic dy- namic stabilization system after two years [ J ]. Spine, 2008,33 ( 26 ) : 2909-2914.
  • 2Disch AC, Sehmoelz W, Matziolis G, et al. Higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration after floating fusions:long- term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Teeh,2008,21 (2) :79-85.
  • 3Anandjiwala J, Sco JY, Ha KY, et al. Adjacent segemt de-generation after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion : a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year fol- low-up [ J]. Eur Spine J,2011,20( 11 ) : 1951-1960.
  • 4施荣茂,王浩明,陈道森,李瀚卿,邸宁,代飞,罗飞,许建中,周强.腰椎融合辅以邻近节段动态固定与腰椎融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病早期疗效的对比观察[J].第三军医大学学报,2013,35(12):1288-1293. 被引量:19
  • 5Fan S, Hu Z. Muhifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion : minimally in- vasive procedure versus conventional open approach [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2010,2:316-324.
  • 6Shuwu F, Xing Z. Minimally invasive transforaminal lum- bar interbody fusion for the treatment of degeneration lum- bar disease [ J ]. Spine ,2010,35 ( 17 ) : 1615-1620.
  • 7顾仕荣,张明,陈斌辉,桑裴铭.经肌间隙入路或后正中入路行腰椎融合术的效果及其对椎旁肌损伤的影响[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(4):320-324. 被引量:30
  • 8Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN, Hochschuler S, et al. Loads sharing characteristics of two novel soft stabilization de- vices in the lumbar motion segments: a biomechanical study in cadaver spine [ J ]. SASAC, Scottdale, 2003 ( 9 ) : 1-3.
  • 9Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1988,13 (3) :175-177.
  • 10李忠海,王诗媛,付强,马辉,唐昊,张秋林.腰椎退行性疾病ISOBAR动态固定早期临床观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(11):973-976. 被引量:12

二级参考文献71

  • 1谢荣,李展振,刘志安,李艳兵,戈才华,邱优国.腰椎融合术对相邻椎间盘退变影响的临床分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):289-290. 被引量:10
  • 2毛路,刘栋,郝剑,沈忆新.腰椎动力固定装置治疗下腰痛的研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(3):262-264. 被引量:8
  • 3Korovessis P, Ilepantis T, Zacharatos S, el al. 1)oes Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion [ J ] ? Eur Spine J, 2009, 18 ( 6 ) : 830 - 840.
  • 4Chert Z, Zhao J, Xu H, et al. Technical factors related to theincidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation after transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(11) :1476 -1480.
  • 5Chow JH, Chan CC. Validation of the Chinese version of the i Oswestty Disability Index [ J ]. Work, 2005, 25 (4) : 307 - 314.
  • 6Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) : 1127 -1131.
  • 7Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M, et al. Minimum lO-year followup study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis[J]. J Spinal Disord, 2001, 14(2) :91 -99.
  • 8Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2008, 33(5):503-507.
  • 9Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosaeral spine [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1998, 23 ( 14 ) : 1550 - 1558.
  • 10Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, et al. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lmnbar spine [ J ]. Med Eng Phys, 2001, 23(7) :483 -491.

共引文献65

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部