不对称双眼皮整形修复术临床治疗效果分析

Analysis of clinical effect of asymmetric double-fold eyelid plastic repair

目的探讨分析不对称双眼皮整形修复术的临床治疗效果。方法选取本院2010年9月至2014年9月收治的102例不对称双眼皮整形患者,将其随机分为对照组(50例)和观察组(52例)。对照组患者采用传统切开法重睑成形术,观察组患者采用小切口去脂与连续埋线并用的重睑成形术,术后评估两组患者美容效果满意率、相关手术指标、不良反应发生情况和术后重睑外形维持的时间。结果观察组患者美容效果满意率为96.2%(50/52),明显高于对照组[54.0%(27/50)],差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。观察组患者手术出血量为(32.3±3.2)ml,明显低于对照组[(44.3±4.4)ml];观察组患者手术时间为(31.3±2.4)分钟,明显低于对照组[(42.3±3.1)分钟];观察组患者切口愈合时间为(7.3±2.1)天,明显短于对照组[(9.3±2.4)天],两组患者上述指标比较差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。两组患者均无严重的不良反应出现,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。观察组患者远期重睑外形持久效果明显优于对照组,差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论采用小切口去脂与连续埋线并用的重睑成形术完成不对称双眼皮手术,其美容效果明显优于传统切开法重睑成形术,操作简单,安全性高,术后美容效果较好,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of asymmetry double-fold eyelid plastic repair. Method Selected 102 patients with plastic repair of asymmetric double-fold eyelid treated in our hospital from September 2010 to September 2014, cases randomly divided into control group with 50 cases treated by doubling eyelid operation and observation group with 52 cases treated by mini-incision fusion to fat and embedded wire. The satisfactions, hemorrhage of surgery, surgery time, healing time, adverse reaction and the long-term maintaining effect of the two group were compared. Result The total satisfaction of observation group was 96.2%（50/52）, which was higher than control group [54.0%（27/50）] （P 0.05）;the long-term maintaining effect was better in observation group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Mini-incision fusion to fat and embedded wire on asymmetric double-fold eyelid plastic repair has a higher success rate of operation, and its repair effect is satisfactory, with the clinical effect of no adverse events.