摘要
设计缺陷作为产品缺陷的一种重要形态,危害范围广,证明难度大。在设计缺陷证明中法定标准该如何适用,不合理危险标准又该如何操作,依照现行立法均存在诸多困惑。分析美国法上相关问题的处理方法,对于解决我国面临的产品设计缺陷举证责任问题有一定的借鉴作用。为实现实质公平、个案正义,应将成本效益分析作为设计缺陷的判定标准,并将产品的安全性作为其首要考量因素;明确国家标准、行业标准的法律地位;实行有效的证据交换;改变相关证据的法律定位;合理适用推定。
Defect in design, as an important form of defect in product, is more dangerous and harder to be proved. How to apply legal criterion to the proving of defect in design？ And how to deal with the unreasonable and dangerous criterion？ According to current legislation, it is really difficult to find an easy and effective way to show the defect. The paper thinks that the practice in America＇s law is helpful for us to solve the problem of burden of proof of product＇s defect in design. In order to pursue the fairness and justice, it believes that it ＇ s necessary to take the cost-benefit analysis as judgment criterion for defect in design and safety as the top priority, clarify the legal status of national and industrial standards, carry out the effective evidence exchange, change the legal orientation of relevant evidence and apply rational reasoning.
出处
《天津商业大学学报》
2015年第2期55-61,共7页
Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
关键词
设计缺陷
判定标准
举证责任
defect in design
judgment criterion
burden of proof
