期刊文献+

探索还是开发?关键一刻的抉择——奇瑞创新战略分析 被引量:4

Exploration or Exploitation?Choice at a Key Moment:The Analysis of Chery's Innovation Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于前景理论与威胁僵化理论,认为管理者对环境的不同威胁感知会影响企业的创新实践,并将这一环境威胁感知区分为控制减少和资源损失两类。同时,本文引入组织冗余变量(已吸收冗余和未吸收冗余),运用文本分析和编码设计方法,以奇瑞为案例研究对象,探究其创新实践的发展历程中,不同类型的环境威胁感知和组织冗余对探索性创新、开发性创新的差异化影响。研究结果表明:管理者对组织内外部环境变化的威胁感知会影响组织创新战略的选择,在资源损失威胁感知下,倾向于采取探索性创新;在控制减少威胁感知下,倾向于采取开发性创新。同时,已吸收冗余会强化控制减少威胁感知与开发性创新之间的关系,未吸收冗余会强化资源损失威胁感知与探索性创新之间的关系。 Based on the threat rigidity theory and the prospect theory, this study proposes that managers' different environmental threat perceptions will influence enterprise's innovation prac- tice, and then categorizes them into threat of control reduction and threat of resources loss. Meanwhile, this paper introduces the variable of organizational slack, and divides it into absorbed slack and unabsorbed slack. Using content analysis and coding design, it investigates the process of the innovation practice of Chery and studies how different environmental threat perceptions and organization slack impact on exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation. The study shows that managers' threat perception of internal and external environment change will affect the choice of organizational innovation strategy, and managers tend to take exploratory innovation under threat of resources loss, and exploitative innovation under threat of control reduction. Meanwhile, absorbed slack can strengthen the relationship between the threat perception of con- trol reduction and exploratory innovation, while unabsorbed slack can strengthen the relationship between the threat perception of resources loss and exploitative innovation.
出处 《管理案例研究与评论》 CSSCI 2015年第1期57-70,共14页 Journal of Management Case Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272064) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(71121061) 安徽省第五批(2010年度)优秀青年科技基金滚动支持项目(1308085JGD07)
关键词 探索性创新 开发性创新 环境威胁感知 组织冗余 exploratory innovation exploitative innovation environmental threat perception organizational slack
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1李剑力.探索性创新、开发性创新及其平衡研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2009,31(3):23-29. 被引量:32
  • 2Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innova- tion, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators [J]. Management Science,2006, 52(11) : 1661-1674.
  • 3Sucheta N, Pamela S B. Environmental context, man- agerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrat- ed view[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(13) : 1395-1427.
  • 4Prithviraj C, William H G, George P H. Organiza- tional actions in response to threats and opportuni- ties[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44 (5) :937-955.
  • 5Oeasio W. The enactment of economic diversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1995,17 : 287-331.
  • 6Staw B, Sandelands L, Dutton J. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981,26:501-524.
  • 7George E, Sitkin B, Barden J. Cognitive underpin- nings of institutional persistence and change A framing perspective[J], Academy of Management Review, 2006,31 (2), 347-365.
  • 8罗彪,葛佳佳,王琼.探索型、挖掘型战略选择对组织绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2014,11(1):37-45. 被引量:26
  • 9Charlotte R R,Guo C. Middlemanager's strategic role in the corporate entrepreneurial process:At- tention-based effeets[J].Journal of Management, 2011,37(6):1586-1610.
  • 10Voss G B,Sirdeshmukh D,Voss Z G. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008,51 ( 1 ) : 147-164.

二级参考文献95

  • 1Teece, D J, Pisano, G, and Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18 (7): 509-533.
  • 2Benner, M J, and Tushman, M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management.. The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 238-256.
  • 3He, Z L, and Wong, P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(7/8): 481-494.
  • 4Leana, C, and Barry, B. Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4): 753-759.
  • 5March, J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(2): 71-87.
  • 6March, J G. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(2): 278-287.
  • 7Katila, R, and Ahuja, G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1183-1194.
  • 8Gupta, A K, Smith,K G, and Shalley,C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 693-706.
  • 9Levinthal,D A, and March, J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(Spe. Iss. ) : 95-112.
  • 10Levitt, B, and March, J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1988, 14(2): 319-340.

共引文献151

同被引文献105

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部