期刊文献+

帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防含多天顺铂方案化疗引起恶心、呕吐的临床观察 被引量:7

A Cross-over Study of Palonosetron and Dexamethasone fro the Prevention fo Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Multipleday Cisplatin Chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察和比较5-HT3受体拮抗剂帕洛诺司琼与托烷司琼联合地塞米松预防含多天顺铂方案化疗引起恶心、呕吐的疗效及安全性。方法将连续使用2周期含多天顺铂方案化疗的住院恶性肿瘤患者,按随机、交叉自身对照的方法分为AB、BA组。AB组病例第1周期的第1、3天化疗前静脉滴注帕洛诺司琼0.25 mg,并于每天化疗前静脉滴注地塞米松10 mg。BA组病例第1周期的第1~3天化疗前均分别静脉滴注托烷司琼5 mg和地塞米松10 mg。第2周期的止吐方案为两组病例第1周期的止吐方案交叉使用。观察化疗开始后7 d内患者恶心、呕吐的控制情况及不良反应发生率。结果共入组49例病例,47例可评价疗效:AB组23例,BA组24例;两组患者在年龄、性别、有无化疗史及病种等方面无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。帕洛诺司琼组在延迟期和全期的化疗相关性恶心呕吐(CINV)的完全控制率显著高于托烷司琼组,分别为57.4%(27/47)和34.0%(16/47),P=0.023;55.3%(26/47)和29.8%(14/47),P=0.012。但在急性CINV方面,两组患者的完全控制率无显著性差异,分别为63.8%(30/47)和53.2%(22/47),P〉0.05。两种止吐药物的不良反应多表现为便秘、头痛、疲劳、呃逆等,发生率较低,程度较轻,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论帕洛诺司琼对含多天顺铂方案化疗引起的迟发性CINV的完全控制率优于托烷司琼。多剂量帕洛诺司琼联合全程使用地塞米松的不良反应轻微。 Objective In order to assess the safety and antiemetic efficacy of multiple-day dosing of palonosetron plus dexamethasone, we conducted this study that compared palonosetron to tropisetron combined with dexamethasone in malignant patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods Patients receiving two consecutive identical courses of a 3-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to group AB and group BA. Palonosetron was administered on day 1 and 3, combined with dexametha-sone every day during the entire period of chemotherapy for the initial course of group AB. And tropisetron plus dexamethasone was administered daily for group BA during the entire period of chemotherapy. Patients were crossover to the opposite treatment with the second course. Results In all, 49 patients were screened for the study and 47 were evaluable. 21 patients were randomly assigned to group AB and 24 to group BA. During the delayed phase(d 4-7), nausea and vomiting were absent in 57.4% of patients of the palonosetron group and 34.0% of the control group(P =0.023). During the overall period of observation(d 1-7), the number was 55.3% and 29.8%, P =0.012. During the acute phase(d 1-3), the absent of nausea and vomiting was numerically superior with palonosetron(63.8% and 53.2%), but there was no statistical difference between the groups, P =0.097. There was no statistical difference of toxicity with palonosetron compared with tropisetron, P〉0.05. Conclusion There was a significant improvement in totally control of delayed CINV with multiple-day dosing of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatinbased chemotherapy, and it was safe and well tolerated.
作者 黄金新
出处 《中国医药指南》 2015年第9期31-33,共3页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 帕洛诺司琼 托烷司琼 顺铂 化疗 不良反应 Palonosetron Tropisetron Cisplatin Chemotherapy Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1于波.顺铂分次给药在肺癌化疗中的临床观察[J].现代医药卫生,2005,21(18):2469-2470. 被引量:2
  • 2叶瑞萍,陈振东,梁维龙,吴秀伟,张明军.不同顺铂给药方案联合长春瑞滨治疗非小细胞肺癌[J].安徽医科大学学报,2009,44(2):269-272. 被引量:5
  • 3纪雪华.注射用顺铂分次给药与单次给药对化疗疗效的影响及安全性评价[J].按摩与康复医学,2011,2(6):35-36. 被引量:4
  • 4徐永红,赵杰,王海清,李海泉,施萍,张衍民.肺癌患者化疗中不同的用药方式的临床评价[J].中国实用医药,2012,7(24):98-99. 被引量:5
  • 5Hainsworth JD,Omura GA,Khojasteh A,et al.Ondansetron(gr38032f):A novel antiemetic effective in patients receiving a multiple-day regimen of cisplatin chemotherapy[J].Am J Clin Oncol,1991,14(4):336-340.
  • 6Einhorn LH,Rapoport B,Koeller J,et al.Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant:Review and consensus statement[J].Support Care Cancer,2005,13(2):112-116.
  • 7Lawrence HL,Einhorn JM.Palonosetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy for germ cell cancer[J].Support Care Cancer,2007,15(11):1293-1300.
  • 8Musso M,Scalone R,Bonanno V,et al.Palonosetron(aloxi)and dexame-thasone for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy[J].Support Care Cancer,2009,17(2):205-209.
  • 9Feinberg B,Gilmore J,Haislip S,et al.Impact of initiating antiemetic prophylaxis with palonosetron versus ondansetron on risk of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with lung cancer receiving multi-day chemotherapy[J].Support Care Cancer,2012,20(3):615-623.
  • 10Schwartzberg L.Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting:State of the art in 2006[J].J Support Oncol,2006,4(2 Suppl 1):3-8.

二级参考文献23

  • 1黄朝刚,刘海龙,雷恒,蔡翔.吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察[J].中国医疗前沿,2008,3(13):74-75. 被引量:6
  • 2倪秉洁.GP方案治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察[J].癌症进展,2005,3(3):276-278. 被引量:11
  • 3杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,Donald Maxwell Parkin.中国肺癌死亡趋势分析及发病、死亡的估计与预测[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):274-278. 被引量:168
  • 4孙燕,周爱萍,王燕,马建辉.临床肿瘤学进展——回眸2006年[J].癌症进展,2007,5(1):3-8. 被引量:7
  • 5Therasse P,Arbuck S G,Eisenhauer E A, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solids tumors[ J]. Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3 ) :205 - 16.
  • 6Trotti A, Colevas A D, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0 : development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [ J ]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003,13 ( 3 ) : 176 - 81.
  • 7Buffoni L, Dongiovanni D, Barone C, et al. Fractionated dose of cisplatin (CDDP) and vinorelbine (VNB) chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non -small cell lung cancer: phase II trial [ J]. Lung Cancer,2006,54(3 ) :353 - 7.
  • 8Shun S C, Beck S L, Pett M A, et al. Assessing responsiveness of cancer-related fatigue instruments:distribution-based and individual anchor-based methods [ J ]. Oncologist, 2007,12 ( 4 ) : 495 - 504.
  • 9Guder W G, Hofmann W. Clinical role of urinary low molecular weight proteins : their diagnostic and prognostic implications [ J ]. Seand J Clin Lab Invest,2008,241 (Suppl) :95 -8.
  • 10Bunn PA.Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who,what,when,why[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20(Suppl118):23-33.

共引文献11

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部