期刊文献+

安南属明时期官员考述

On the Officials of Annam During the Ming Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 永乐初,明成祖派兵平定安南后,郡县其地,并改名为交趾,设立交趾三司及府州县统治机构,采用流官主导,土官辅助的方式共同治理。在交趾属明二十年间,明朝对交趾地方官员也实施考满与考察相结合的考核形式,但与内地又有差别。由于交趾官员的整体水平偏低,加上考核的作用有限,导致吏治腐败,激起民变,这些都是明朝失去交趾的重要原因。 At the beginning of Yongle Period, Mingchengzu sent troops to Annam and quickly won the occupation of it. Then the Ming Dynasty turned Annam into a country named JiaoZhi, and set up different levels of administration frame. During the twenty years when JiaoZhi belonged to the Ming Dynasty, many governors, who were from inner place, were sent to JiaoZhi, together with local governors to manage it. The Ming Dynasty also used Kaoman and Kaocha to assess the officials, but the way was a little different from that of the inner place. Due to the low level of the whole ruling class and the limited effect of the assess system, the bureaucracy of JiaoZhi was corrupt, and inevitably caused natives’ revolts. All of these were the reasons why the Ming Dynasty lost JiaoZhi.
作者 李标福
出处 《红河学院学报》 2015年第2期12-16,共5页 Journal of Honghe University
关键词 交趾 流官 土官 管理 影响 JiaoZhi Liu Guang Tu Guang Management Influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1清·张廷玉.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974..
  • 2佚名.安南志原[M].法国远东学院,1931.
  • 3黄福.黄忠宣公文集[M]//.四库全书存目丛书:集部第27册.济南:齐鲁书礼.1997:229.
  • 4明太宗实录[M].台北:中央研究院历史语言研究所校印本,1962.
  • 5明砂以简[M].殊域周咨录余思黎点校北京:中华书局3000.
  • 6明宣宗实录[M].台北:中央研究院历史语言研究所,1962.975.
  • 7[越]吴士连,等.大越史记全书[M].尔荆和校.日本东京大学东洋文化研究所附属东洋文献,1977.
  • 8[越]潘清简.钦定越史通鉴纲目正编:卷12[M],越南1884年刻本.
  • 9申畴行,等.明会典:卷12[M].北京:中华拈局,1989:70.
  • 10明·李文风.越峤书:卷1[M]//.四库全书存日丛书:史部第162册.济南:齐鲁书社,1997:696.

共引文献287

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部