期刊文献+

急诊疑似急性肺动脉栓塞诊断中Wells评分应用价值探讨 被引量:1

CLINICAL APPLICATION VALUE INVESTIGATION OF WELLS SCORES ON DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED ACUTE APE IN EMERGENCY
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急诊疑似急性肺动脉栓塞(APE)诊断中Wells评分应用价值。方法回顾性分析该院近期收治急诊疑似APE患者76例临床资料,依据Wells评分分为低度、中度及高度可疑组,比较Wells评分单用及与D-二聚体检测联用于不同组APE发病率和诊断假阳性率。结果三组患者APE发病率和诊断假阳性率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);低度可疑组患者二种方法联用于APE诊断假阳性率显著低于Wells评分单用(P<0.05)。结论 Wells评分用于急诊疑似APE诊断具有操作简便,预测准确度高等优势,而联合D-二聚体检测有助于降低诊断假阳性率。 Objective To investigate clinical application value investigation of Wells scores on diagnosis of suspected acute APE in emergency. Methods Clinical data of 76 patients with suspected acute APE in emergency were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 3 group including low degree suspected group, me dium degree suspected group and high degree suspected group according to Wells scores; and the incidence rate of APE and false positive rate of diagnosis in different groups by Wells score used alone and combined with Ddimer detection were compared. Results There were significant differences in incidence rate of APE and false positive rate of diagnosis among 3 groups(P〈0.05). The false positive rate of diagnosis in low degree suspected group by two method combined diagnosis was significantly lower than Wells score used alone(P〈0.05). Conclusion Wells scores on diagnosis of suspected acute APE in emergency have advantages including simple operation and high prediction accuracy; Wells scores combined with D- dimer detection on diagnosis of suspected acute APE is helpful to lower false positive rate of diagnosis.
出处 《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》 2015年第3期381-383,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
基金 沧州市科学技术研究与发展指导计划项目(编号:1213056ZD)
关键词 急性肺动脉栓塞 WELLS评分 D-二聚体 APE Wells score D - dimer
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献57

  • 1肖洪广,黄泽红,林诚,林勇平.肺栓塞患者血浆D-二聚体与纤维蛋白原联合测定的意义[J].热带医学杂志,2005,5(5):609-611. 被引量:7
  • 2贾卫滨,张春秀,顼志敏.中国肺动脉栓塞误诊近四年文献分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):277-280. 被引量:105
  • 3翟振国,王辰.肺栓塞-深静脉血栓形成的研究现状与展望[J].中国实用内科杂志:临床前沿版,2006,26(7):1050-1052. 被引量:29
  • 4国家"十五"攻关"肺栓塞规范化诊治方法的研究"课题组,杨媛华,翟振国,武燕兵,王辰.急性肺血栓栓塞症患者516例临床表现分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(31):2161-2165. 被引量:78
  • 5赵光煊,王辉宇,赵强.急性肺栓塞28例误诊分析[J].新医学,2006,37(10):672-673. 被引量:4
  • 6Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism [ J ]. Am J Med, 2002, 113 : 269 - 275.
  • 7Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer[ J ]. Ann Intern Med,2001,135 :98 - 107.
  • 8Miniati M, Bottai M, Monti S. Comparison of 3 clinical models for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism [ J ]. Medicine (Baltimore) ,2005,84 : 107 - 114.
  • 9Moores LK, Collenb JF, Woodsa KM, et al. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution [ J ]. Thromb Res,2004,113 : 1 - 6.
  • 10Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, et al. Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells role for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism [ J ]. J Thromb Haemost ,2008,6:40 - 44.

共引文献2851

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部