期刊文献+

生物技术国际立法路径变迁及对策研究

International Biotechnology Legislative Path Changes and Coping Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析生物技术国际立法路径变迁趋势,描述了生物技术国际立法之间的关系,并对比了以《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(TRIPS)为代表的财产性条约体系与以《生物多样性公约》(CBD)为代表的共有性条约体系,TRIPS强调对技术所有者的保护,CBD强调对资源所有者的保护;认为生物技术国际立法逐渐显出统一合作趋势,日益重视利益平衡原则,对国内法的制约和影响也有所增强;中国需要积极参与生物技术国际条约的制定和执行,提高国内生物技术企业研发能力,增强在条约制定和修订中的发言权。 Through analyzing the changing trend of international biotechnology legislation, this paper describes the relationship among biotechnology legislations. A contrast has also been made between the Property - oriented Treaties system, represented by TRIPS, with the Commons -oriented Treaties system, represented by CBD, respectively. TRIPS emphasizes the protection of the technology owners, while CBD attaches greater importance to protecting the natural resources. International legislation of the biotechnology is gradually turning towards a unified trend, also paying attention to the principle of interests balance. Moreover, its influence on domestic law increases accordingly. For this change China needs to actively participate in the enaetion and performance of international treaties of biotechnology, and through improving the domestic biotechnology research and development capabilities, to become better qualified in the treaty - making.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期83-91,共9页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD170)
关键词 生物技术产业 国际法 立法路径变迁 biotechnology industry international law, legislative path changes
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1LINARELLI J.Treaty governance,intellectual property and biodiversity[J].Environmental Law Review,2004,6(1):21-38.
  • 2LOFFLER A,SCOTT STERN.The future of the biomedical industry in the era of globalization[M].Northwestern University,Kellogg School of Business,2006:5.
  • 3STEPHEN W CHEN,MARINA.Patent protection in medicine and biotechnology:an overview[J].Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law,2011(4):109-158.
  • 4MUSUNGU S,OH C.The use of flexibilities in TRIPS by developing countries:can they promote access to medicines?[R].World Health Organization,2005:2.
  • 5Bandag Inc v Al Bolster′s Tire Stores 750 F2d 903,924[R].Fed Cir,1984.
  • 6赵瑾.生物多样性保护与知识产权制度之协调——以生物多样性公约为视角[J].学术交流,2009(6):58-60. 被引量:1
  • 7STRAUSS D M.Feast or famine:the impact of the wto decision favoring the u.s.biotech-nologyindustry in the eu ban of genetically modified foods[J].American Business Law Journal,2008,45:775-811.
  • 8NWABUEZE R N.What can genomics and health biotechnology do for developing countries[J].Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology,2005,369(15):401-404.
  • 9VIERROS M.The convention on biological diversity:moving from policy to implementation[J].Sustainable Development Law & Policy,2006(7):17-23.
  • 10Mechlem K.Agricultural biotechnologies,transgenic crops and the poor:opportunities and challenges[J].Human Rights Law Review,2010,10(4):749-764.

二级参考文献53

  • 1沈宗灵.对霍菲尔德法律概念学说的比较研究[J].中国社会科学,1990(1):67-77. 被引量:76
  • 2何宏宇,文建平.欧美国家推动生物技术产业发展一瞥[J].中国药业,2005,14(2):16-17. 被引量:13
  • 3王宏飞.美国生物技术产业发展现状[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2005,20(1):42-44. 被引量:7
  • 4李振唐,雷海章.农业生物技术产业化及其实现途径[J].广西社会科学,2005(4):54-56. 被引量:4
  • 5Glowka L. A Guide to the Conventioin on Biological Diversity [M]. Gland and Cambrige: IUCN Environmnetal Law Centre, 1994:1-2
  • 6CBD. Convention on Biological Diversity( Chinese Text) [OL]. [2008-6- 18]. http://www. cbd. int/doc/legal/cbd-un-zh. pdf
  • 7FAO. International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources [OL]. [ 2008- 8- 6 ]. http ://www. fao. org/ag/cgrfa/IU. htm
  • 8FAO. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture [ OL] . [ 2008-8-28 ]. http://www. fao. org/ag/ cgrfa/itpgr.htm#text
  • 9CGIAR. Biodiversity and Plant Genetic Resources [ EB/OL]. [ 2008-8-281. http ://www. cgiar.org/centers/index. html
  • 10新华网.防止生物遗传资源流失专利法修改剑指基因窃取[EB/OL].[2008-8-31].http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2008-08/31/content_9743861.htm.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部