期刊文献+

中国反垄断民事诉讼制度的回顾与展望 被引量:4

Retrospection and Prospect on Antimonopoly Civil Action System in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反垄断民事诉讼制度的首要问题是,如何在民事诉讼与行政执法之间寻求衡平。法院采取积极进取的态度,秉持谦抑务实的理念,确立了反垄断民事诉讼的基本规则,并以保障法律统一适用为重点,以个案裁判为主要载体逐步充实反垄断民事诉讼制度。法院更倾向于扩展适格当事人的范围,更重视制止垄断行为,补偿受害人的实际损失。反垄断成文法与判例法将在反垄断法实施过程中得以融合。 The key issue on antimonopoly civil action system is the equity between civil action and administrative enforcement in antimonopoly law. The fundamental norms of antimonopoly civil action system have been established by the positive and tolerant courts in China, and the improvement of such norms will be promoted under the strategy which is focused on the unification through case by case analysis. Currently, Courts prefer to extend the scope of justified plaintiffs and defendants, and emphasize to deter the illegal action and to offer compensation to injured parties. The coherence between positive law and case law will be realized through the enforcement of antimonopoly law.
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2015年第2期78-92,共15页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词 反垄断民事诉讼 适格当事人 赔偿损失 合同无效 Antimonopoly Civil Action Justified Parties Compensation Voidness of Anticompetitive Agreements
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

  • 1吴宏伟.我国反垄断法与产业政策、竞争政策目标[J].法学杂志,2005,26(2):16-20. 被引量:25
  • 2[美]赫伯特·霍温坎普.反垄断事业原理与执行[M].吴绪亮等译.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2011.39.
  • 3吴宏伟,闫卫军.论反垄断执法机构的行政决定在反垄断“跟进诉讼”程序中的效力[J].新疆社科论坛,2010(5):56-60. 被引量:7
  • 4[美]罗伯托·曼戈贝拉·昂格尔.法律分析应当为何[M].李诚予译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.95-117.
  • 5[美]阿德里安·沃缪勒.不确定状态下的裁判:法律解释的制度理论[M].梁迎修,孟庆友,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
  • 6[美]迈尔文·艾隆·艾森伯格.普通法的本质[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2004.1.
  • 7[日]南博方.行政法(第六版)[M].杨建顺,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
  • 8李俊峰.中国反垄断行政执法的资源、意愿与威慑力[A].王晓晔.反垄断法实施中的重大问题[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.348-356.
  • 9[美]赫伯特·霍温坎普.联邦反托拉斯政策:竞争法律及其实践(第3版)[M].许光耀江山王晨译.北京:法律出版社,2009.681,737.
  • 10Wolfgang Wurmnest. A New Era for Private Antitrust Litigation in Germany? A Critical Appraisal of the Modernized Law against Restraints of Competition. 6 German L. J. 1173 (2005) ,1179 -1180.

二级参考文献105

  • 1梁慧星.电视节目预告表的法律保护与利益衡量[J].法学研究,1995,17(2):81-89. 被引量:81
  • 2童之伟.宪法司法适用研究中的几个问题[J].法学,2001(11):3-8. 被引量:101
  • 3王利明.关于无效合同确认的若干问题[J].法制与社会发展,2002,8(5):60-68. 被引量:106
  • 4《反垄断法》第50条.
  • 5全国人大法工委.《中华人民共和国反垄断法:条文说明、立法理由与相关规定》,北京大学出版社2007年版,第316-317页.
  • 6Herbert Hovenkamp, Federal Antitrust Policy, Thomas/ West, 2005, p. 657.
  • 7John Johnson, "Economic Approaches to Antitrust Damage Estimation", January 2005, p. 1, http: //ww-w. nera. corn/ image/AntitrustM20DamageM20Estimation _1. 2005. pdf.
  • 8Emily Clark, Mat Hughes and David Wirth, "Analysis of Economic Models for The Calculation Of Damages", 31 August 2004, pp. 11--12, http: //ec. europa, eu/competition/ antitrust/actionsdamages/economic _ clean _ en. pdf.
  • 9Theon van Dijk and Frank Verboven, "Quantification of damages", Draft Version, pp. 4-- 7, http: //www. econ. kuleuven, be/public/NDBAD83/Frank/Papers/VanN 20Diik % 20&20Verboven, % 202006. pdf.
  • 10Theon van Dijk and Frank Verboven, "Quantification of damages", Draft Version, p. 30.

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部