期刊文献+

不同抑制剂脱除方法对玉米秸秆水解液发酵的影响 被引量:1

Comparison of Detoxification Methods of Corn Stover Hydrolysate for Butanol Production
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过向玉米秸秆水解液中添加活性炭、Ca(OH)2、活性炭+Ca(OH)2、亚硫酸钠和连二亚硫酸钠五种物质,研究了不同抑制剂脱除方法对水解液各组分及其对发酵的影响。结果表明,抑制剂脱除率由高到低依次为:活性炭+Ca(OH)2>活性炭>Ca(OH)2>亚硫酸钠和连二亚硫酸钠,这与对还原糖造成的损失一致。对Clostridium beijerincii 8052发酵水解液的影响,由好到差依次为:Ca(OH)2>活性炭>活性炭+Ca(OH)2>亚硫酸钠和连二亚硫酸钠。活性炭+Ca(OH)2的组合虽能最大程度去除糠醛、羟甲基糠醛和可溶性木素三种抑制剂,但从发酵结果来看,脱除抑制剂后的水解液中还存在其它未知组分对厌氧发酵产生一定影响。 By adding the following five substances to corn stover hydrolyzate: charcoal, Ca(OH)2, charcoal and Ca(OH)2, sodium sulfite, and sodium hydrosulfite, studied the effects of different methods of inhibitor removal on the components in hydrolyzate and in the process of fermentation. The results showed that the removal rate of inhibitors was in descending order: charcoal + Ca(OH)E, charcoal, Ca(OH)2 , sodium sulfite and sodium hydrosulfite, which was consistent with the loss of reducing sugar. While removal factors of the detoxified hydrolyzate fermented with Clostridium beijerincii 8052 were rated from high to low: Ca(OH)E, charcoal, charcoal + Ca(OH)2, sodium sulfite and sodium dithionite. Although method of charcoal + Ca(OH)2 achieved the greatest removal of furfural, HMF and soluble lignin, as the fermentation research findings showed was found that some unknown components in the hydrolyzate still have a bad impact on the anaerobic fermentation.
出处 《纤维素科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 2015年第1期14-20,共7页 Journal of Cellulose Science and Technology
基金 青岛大学优秀研究生学位论文培育资助项目(YSPY2009014)
关键词 抑制剂 脱除 产醇梭菌 发酵 inhibitors removal Clostridium fermentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Guo X,Cavka A,Jonsson L J,et al.Comparison of methods for detoxification of spruce hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production[J].Microbial Cell Factories,2013,12:93.
  • 2Sainio T,Turku I,Heinonen J.Adsorptive removal of fermentation inhibitors from concentrated acid hydrolyzates of lignocellulosic biomass[J].Bioresource Technology,2011,102(10):6048-6057.
  • 3Mussatto S I,Roberto I C.Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes:a review[J].Bioresource Technology,2004,93(1):1-10.
  • 4Ezeji T,Qureshi N,Blaschek H P.Impact of degradation products on Clostridium beijerinckii growth and butanol fermentation[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2007,97(6):6-14.
  • 5Cho D H,Lee Y J,Um Y,et al.Detoxification of model phenolic compounds in lignocellulosic hydrolysates with peroxidase for butanol production from Clostridium beijerinckii[J].Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering,2009,83(6):1035-1043.
  • 6Larsson S,Cassland P,Jonsson L J.Development of a saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with enhanced resistance to phenolic fermentation inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates by heterologous expression of laccase[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2001,67(3):1163-1170.
  • 7Zhang K D,Chen X H,Schwarz W H,et al.Synergism of glycoside hydrolase secretomes from two thermophilic bacteria cocultivated on lignocellulose[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2014,80(8):2592-2601.
  • 8Eduardo K,Paulo M,Alexandra C.Analysis of soluble lignin in sugarcane by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry with a Do-It-yourself oligomer database[J].Anal Chem,2012,84(16):7015-7020.
  • 9Kaar W E,Brink D L.Simplified analysis of acid soluble lignin[J].Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology,1991,11(4):465-477.
  • 10Guo T,Tang Y,Zhang Q Y,et al.Clostridium beijerinckii mutant with high inhibitor tolerance obtained by low-energy ion implantation[J].J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol,2012,39(3):401-407.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部