期刊文献+

物种敏感度分布的非参数核密度估计模型 被引量:10

Non-Parametric Kernel Density Estimation of Developing Species Sensitivity Distributions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前物种敏感度分布参数方法建模所存在的缺点,首次提出基于非参数核密度估计方法的物种敏感度分布模型,并提出相应的最优窗宽和检验方法。选用无机汞作为案例研究对象,利用非参数核密度估计方法和3种传统参数模型分别推导了保护我国水生生物的无机汞的急性水质基准值。结果表明,非参数核密度估计方法在推导无机汞水质基准中的稳健性和精确度都大大优于传统参数模型,能够更好地构建物种敏感度分布曲线。该方法的提出丰富了水质基准的理论方法学,为更好地保护水生生物提供了有力的支撑。 To address the inadequacies associated with parametric density estimations for species sensitivity distributions, we developed a new probabilistic model based on non-parametric kernel density estimation and proposed related optimal bandwidths and testing methods as well. With inorganic mercury as the target compound, the non-parametric kernel density estimation method and three conventional parametric density estimation methods were used to derive acute water quality criteria for protection of aquatic species in China. The results demonstrated that the new probabilistic model was superior over the conventional parametric density estimations in deriving water quality criteria for inorganic mercury, as well as in constructing species sensitivi- ty distribution. The proposed method has enriched the methodological foundation for water quality criteria and provided solid support for protection of aquatic organisms.
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期215-224,共10页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
基金 环保公益项目(201309060 201409037) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(41130743)
关键词 无机汞 淡水水生生物 水质基准 非参数核密度估计 物种敏感度分布 inorganic mercury freshwater organisms water quality criteria non-parametric kernel density estimation species sensitivity distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Kooijman S A L M. A safety factor for LCs0 values al- lowing for differences in sensitivity among species [J]. Water Research, 1987, 21(3): 269 -276.
  • 2Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Minis- ters (CCME). A protocol for the Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Auqtic Life [R]. Ottawa: CCME, 2007.
  • 3Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conser- vation Council and Agriculture and Resource Manage- ment Council of Australian and New Zealand (ANZECC, ARMCANZ). Peper No.4 Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality [R]. Canberra: ANZECC, ARMCANZ, 2000.
  • 4US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guide- lines for Ecological Risk Assessment [R]. Washington DC: US EPA, 1998.
  • 5Posthurna L, Surer II G, Traas T P. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton FL: Lewis Publishers, 2002:1 - 198.
  • 6Van Vlaardingen P L A, Traas P T, Wintersen A M, et al. Etx2.0. A program to calculate hazardous concentra- tions and fraction affected, based on normally-distribu- ted toxicity data. RIVM report (and software ) 601501028/2004 [R]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2004.
  • 7Pennington D W. Extrapolating ecotoxicological meas- ures from small data sets [J]. Ecotoxicology and Envi- ronmental Safety, 2003, 56(2): 238 -250.
  • 8Shao Q. Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC toxicity data: An alternative approach [J]. En- vironmetrics, 2000, 11 (5): 583 - 595.
  • 9Van Straalen N M. Threshold models for species sensi- tivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacolo- gy, 2002, 11(3-4): 167 - 172.
  • 10Newman M C, Ownby D R, Mezin L C, et al. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk as- sessment: Assumptions of distn'bution type and suffi- cient numbers of species [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000, 19(2): 508 - 515.

二级参考文献390

共引文献388

同被引文献180

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部