期刊文献+

640层CT冠状动脉造影AIDR3D重建算法的图像质量及辐射剂量评价 被引量:3

Evaluation on image quality and radiation dose of 640-slice CT coronary arteriography with AIDR3D reconstruction algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价640层CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)三维自适应迭代剂量降低(AIDR3D)重建算法的图像质量及辐射剂量。方法连续性84例患者接受640层CT自动曝光扫描冠状动脉造影检查,在图像后处理工作站分别采用AIDR3D、滤波反投影(FBP)算法对扫描的原始图像数据进行重建。2位不知道临床信息及重建算法并且富有经验的影像科医生独立测量、计算2种重建算法CTCA的图像噪声、信噪比和对比噪声比,4等级法定性评价CTCA的图像质量。根据CT机扫描输出的剂量长度乘积计算辐射剂量。统计分析比较2种重建算法CTCA的定量及定性图像质量。结果 AIDR3D重建算法CTCA的图像噪声为(27.20±4.40)HU,较FBP(60.00±12.40)HU减少了46.10%,信噪比21.10±5.10较FBP 11.40±2.80提高了84.70%,对比噪声比24.70±5.10较FBP 13.50±3.20提高了82.20%,二者比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AIDR3D重建算法冠状动脉近部、中部、远部的图像质量定性评价分数分别为(3.90±0.30)、(3.70±0.50)、(3.60±0.60)分,均高于FBP[分别为(2.60±0.60)、(2.30±0.60)、(2.10±0.70)分],二者比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AIDR3D、FBP重建算法可以用于诊断的冠状动脉总段数分别为1 216段(96.50%)、504段(40.00%),二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平均有效辐射剂量为(2.10±1.00)mSv。结论 640层CTCA AIDR3D重建算法不仅较常规的FBP重建算法的图像噪声显著减少,定量及定性图像质量均明显提高,而且有效辐射剂量低。 Objective To investigate the image quality and radiation dose of 640-slice CT coronary arteriography(CTCA)with adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional(AIDR3D)reconstrucction algoritym.Methods 640-slice CTCA with automatic exposure was performed on 84 consecutive patients.The original image data were reconstructed with AIDR3 Dand the filtered back-projection(FBP)algorithms at the image postprocessing workstation.Two experienced radiologists without knowing clinical information and reconstruction algorithms independently measured and calculated the image noise,signal-to-noise ratio and contrastto-noise ratio with AIDR3 Dand FBP reconstruction algorithms.The qualitative image quality was assessed by using the 4-point scale.The radiation dose was calculated based on dose-length product exported on CT scanner.The quantitative and qualitative image quality with two kinds of reconstruction algorithm was analyzed statistically.Results The CTCA image noise was(27.20±4.40)HU with AIDR3Dand(60.00±12.40)HU with FBP,which with AIDR3 Dwas decreased by 46.10%than that with FBP;the signal-to-noise ratio was 21.10±5.10 with AIDR3 D and 11.40±2.80 with FBP,which with AIDR3 D was increased by84.70%than that with FBP;the contrast-to-noise ratio was 24.70±5.10 with AIDR3Dand 13.50±3.20 with FBP,which with AIDR3 Dwas raised by 82.20%than that with FBP,the differences in 3indexes between the two kinds of reconstruction algorithm were statistically significant(P〈0.05).The CTCA qualitative image quality scores of proximal,middle and distal parts with AIDR3Dwere(3.90±0.30),(3.70±0.50)and(3.60±0.60)respectively,which all were higher than(2.60±0.60),(2.30±0.60)and(2.10±0.70)with FBP respectively,the differences in 3items between 2kinds of algorithm had statistical significance(P〈0.05).The total segments which could be used to diagnose the CTCA images with AIDR3 Dand FBP algorithms were 1 216segments(96.50%)and 504segments(40.00%),respectively,the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05).The mean effective radiation dose was(2.10±1.00)mSv.Conclusion 640-slice CTCA with AIDR3 Dreconstruction algorithm not only significantly reduces the image noise than the conventional FBP algorithm,improves the quantitative and qualitative image quality,but also decreases the effective radiation dose.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第10期1358-1361,共4页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 冠状动脉造影 三维自适应迭代剂量降低 图像处理 计算机辅助 辐射剂量 tomography X-ray computed coronary artery angiography adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional image processing computer-assisted radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1彭盛坤,曾勇明,罗天友,郁仁强,王杰,刘潇,彭刚,谭欢.冠状动脉CTA迭代重建算法图像质量和辐射剂量的实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2013,35(13):1371-1375. 被引量:10
  • 2Hausteiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radia- tion dose associated with cardiac CT angiography[J]. JA- MA,2009,301 (5) :500-507.
  • 3Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Adaptive sta- tistical iterative reconstruction:assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010,195 (3) : 649-654.
  • 4Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, et al. Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography:initial experience:-J]. Int J Cardiovasc Ima- ging,2011,27(7) :1081-1087.
  • 5Kim M, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. Adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm in CT: effect on image quality com- pared with filtered back projection in body phantoms of different sizes[J]. Korean J Radiol,2014,15(2) : 195-204.
  • 6Yoo RE, Park EA, Lee W, et al. Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection [J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2013,29(3):669-676.
  • 7Joemai RM, Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, et al. Adaptive itera- tive dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT:evaluation of image quality[J]. AJR Am .1 Roentgen- ol,2013,201(6) ;1291-1297.
  • 8Chen MY,Steigner ML, Leung SW, et al. Simulated 500/00 radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography u- sing adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D) [J]. Int J Cardiovase Imaging, 2013,29 (5) : 1167-1175.
  • 9Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruc- tion technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT : fea- sibility study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009,193 (3) : 764 771.
  • 10Rybicki FJ, Otero H J, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomo- graphy[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imauinu,2008,24(5) :535-546.

二级参考文献35

  • 1杨勇,张圆月,刘志宏,刘萍.医用诊断X射线剂量探测技术概述[J].中国测试技术,2005,31(4):94-96. 被引量:25
  • 2彭永伦,郭洪涛,张莹,成德华.CT机扫描条件对CT值和辐射剂量指数的影响[J].中国计量,2007(5):62-63. 被引量:10
  • 3Kalra MK,Maher MM,Toth TL,et al.Strategies for CT radia-tion dose optimization.Radiology,2004,230(3):619-628.
  • 4Heyer CM,Mohr PS,Lemburg SP,et al.Image quality and ra-diation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100-or 120-kVp protocol:Prospective randomized study.Radiology,2007,245(2):577-583.
  • 5Kalra MK,Wittram C,Maher MM,et al.Can noise reductionfilters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images?Pilot study.Radiology,2003,228(1):257-264.
  • 6Marin D,Nelson RC,Schindera ST,et al.Low-tube-voltage,high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT:Improved imagequality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical itera-tive reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.Radiolo-gy,2010,254(1):145-153.
  • 7Pan X,Sidky EY,Vannier M.Why do commercial CT scannersstill employ traditional,filtered back-projection for image recon-struction?Inverse Probl,2009,25(12):1230009.
  • 8Knesaurek K,Machac J,Vallabhajosula S,et al.A new iterativereconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolu-tion positron emission tomography.Eur J Nucl Med,1996,23(6):656-661.
  • 9Wells RG,King MA,Simkin PH,et al.Comparing filteredbackprojection and ordered-subsets expectation maximization forsmall-lesion detection and localization in 67Ga SPECT.J NuclMed,2000,41(8):1391-1399.
  • 10Riddell C,Carson RE,Carrasquillo JA,et al.Noise reduction inoncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction:A quanti-tative assessment.J Nucl Med,2001,42(9):1316-1323.

共引文献129

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部