期刊文献+

社会救助制度形成的动力比较

A Comparative Study of the Driving Force in the Social Assistance Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对英国、美国和德国社会救助体系形成过程中的动力因素进行比较发现,来自底层群体的压力、社会运动与阶级斗争、福利理念与意识形态等对三个国家的救助体系带来的影响是不同的,不同国家救助体系发展的动力不同。研究发现,英国来自社会底层群体的压力、混合的福利理念是该国社会救助体系发展的动力;美国的动力因素则是来自社会底层群体的压力和社会运动与阶级斗争;德国社会救助体系作为社会保险体系的补充,其建设更加依赖福利理念与意识形态因素。 Through analyzing the driving force of social assistance systems in England,America and Germany,it is found that the pressures from underclass,social movement and welfare ideology have different effects on those three countries. To England,the pressures from underclass and mixed welfare ideology play a key role in the development of its social assistance system. To America,underclass pressures and social movements are the driving forces. To Germany,the social assistance system is the supplement of their social insurance system so it relies more on welfare ideology.
作者 刘璐婵
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期13-16,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 社会救助 制度动力 社会福利 比较研究 social assistance institutional driving force social welfare comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1金斯伯格.福利分化:比较社会政策批判导论[M].姚俊,张丽,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2010.
  • 2埃斯平.安德森.转型中的福利国家:全球经济中的国家调整[M].杨刚,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:4.
  • 3托本·艾弗森.福利制度扩张的动力:贸易开放度、去工业化和党派政治[c]//保罗·皮尔逊.福利制度的新政治学.汪淳波,苗正民,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004:116.
  • 4迪尼托.社会福利:政治与公共政策[M].5版.何敬,葛其伟,译.杨伟民,校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:39-40.
  • 5安可·哈塞尔,吴楚(译),黄天海(译).大改组:德国开放的政治学[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,42(3):86-96. 被引量:1
  • 6丁建定,杨凤娟.英国社会保障制度的发展[M].北京.中国劳动社会保障出版社.2003.
  • 7埃斯平-安德森.福利资本主义的三个世界[M].苗正民,滕玉英,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:52.
  • 8沃尔夫冈·查普夫.现代化与社会转型[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1998,1..

二级参考文献28

  • 1G. Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
  • 2P. Manow & E. Seils,"Adjusting Badly: The German Welfare State, Structural Change, and the Open Economy," in F. W. Scharpf & V. A. Schmidt(eds. ) ,Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges in Twelve Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 264 - 308.
  • 3P. Pierson, The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 4S. Wood,"Business, Government and Patterns for Labor Market Policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany," in P. Hall & D. Soskice (eds.) ,Varieties of Capitalism,Oxford.. Oxford University Press,2001, pp. 247 - 274.
  • 5A. Hassel,"What Does Business Want? Labour Market Reform in CME and Its Problems," in M. Rhodes, B. Hancke& M. Thatcher (eds.), Institutional Change in Contemporary European Capitalism, Conflict, Contradiction and Complementaries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 253 - 277.
  • 6P. A. Hall,"The Political Economy of Europe in an Era of Interdependence," in H. Kitschelt,P. Lange & G. Marks et al. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 135 - 163.
  • 7W. Streeck & K. Thelen(eds. ), Beyond Continuity : Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford.. Oxford University Press,2005.
  • 8P. A. Hall & K. Thelen,"Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism,"Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 7, No. 1(2009),pp. 7 -34.
  • 9D. Clegg,"Continental Drift: On Unemployment Policy Change in Bismarckian Welfare States," Social Policy and Administration ,Vol. 41 ,No. 6(2007) ,pp. 597 - 617.
  • 10A. Hassel & C. Schiller," Bringing the State Back in- The Role of Fiscal Federalism in Welfare Restructuring ,"http://ssrn. com/abstract = 1507758,2011 - 12 - 30.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部