摘要
实质审查过程中专利法第二十二条第三款一直是审查员关注的重点,本文以专利法第二十二条第三款的规定与立法宗旨为理论基础,通过化工催化剂领域两个复审案例,来探讨化工催化剂技术方案中的用途限定对于其创造性的影响。
Substantive review process of Article 22(3) of the Patent Law has been the focus of attention examiners, with the legislative purpose of this paper to the provisions of Article 22(3) of the Patent Law as the theoretical basis for review by both the chemical industry catalyst case, to explore the chemical catalyst technology program uses limited impact on their creativity.
出处
《广东化工》
CAS
2015年第7期101-102,共2页
Guangdong Chemical Industry