期刊文献+

从生态美学的“参与审美”看梭罗自然观对爱默生自然观的超越——以《瓦尔登湖》与《论自然》为文本依据 被引量:2

Thoreau's Nature Idea Transcending over Emerson's from the Angle of“Participation Aesthetics”of Ecological Aesthetics:Taking“Walden”and“Nature”as the Text Bases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 梭罗与爱默生均以"自然书写"为世人所熟知,但在长期共同的超验主义理论话语规制下,两者"自然"观的差异混泯不清,因而在生态美学研究日盛的当下,关于两者"自然书写"的生态价值的品量也显得模糊不清。其实,以生态美学的"参与审美"为切入视角,可以看到梭罗的"自然书写"超越于爱默生之处,梭罗的自然观与爱默生自然观念的巨大差异也彰显无遗。更为重要的是,这种超越与差异,对当下人类面临的生态问题的解决有着深刻启示。 Thoreau and Emerson are well-known for"nature writing".But within the long-term common transcendental theoretical discourse constraints,the differences between them on the "natural"concept are not clear.Thus at present when the study on ecological aesthetics is becoming increasingly popular,ecological value of both "nature writing"is also blurry.Actually,from the perspective"participation aesthetics"in ecological aesthetics,Thoreau's "nature writing"transcends over Emerson's with the great differences shown between their ideas of nature.More importantly,this kind of transcendence and difference has a profound inspiration in solving the ecological problems confronted by mankind today.
作者 何山石
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第2期171-176,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 生态美学 参与审美 梭罗 爱默生 自然观念 ecological aesthetics participation aesthetics Thoreau Emerson idea of nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1梭罗.瓦尔登湖[M].戴欢译.北京:当代世界出版社,2003:118,114,85,48,9,88,23,122,208,160.
  • 2阿诺德·柏林特.环境美学[M].张敏,等,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2006:74.
  • 3爱默生.爱默生集[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1993.

共引文献19

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部