灰色存在论——与马里翁一道反思笛卡尔与海德格尔的存在论

The gray ontology——Reflect on Descartes' s and Heidegger's Ontology with Marion

本文依循马里翁的评论性分析,首先从海德格尔的解构存在论历史的目标出发,分析并指出海德格尔对笛卡尔的指责适用于两个耽搁,即本我的耽搁和世界的耽搁,然后对造成这两种耽搁的原因进行了分析,对笛卡尔的本我和海德格尔的此在之间的对立和确认关系进行了四个层面的阐述。文章最后指出,海德格尔对笛卡尔灰色存在论的解构其实力图恢复具有希腊内涵的"我",本我和此在只是"我"的两种不同言说策略。

Following Marion＇ s critical analysis, This article first starts from the aims of Heidegger＇ s destruction of the history of ontology, analyzes and points out Heidegger＇ s criticism suits two omissions： the omission of ego and the omission of world. By analyzing the reason of two omissions, the article explains the opposition between the Descartes＇ s ego and Heidegger＇ s dasein from four aspects. The article finally points out Heidegger＇ s destruction of Descartes＇ s gray ontology actually recovers the Greek meaning of the ＂I＂, while ego and dasein are just two different saying strategy of the ＂I＂ .